BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 348 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 22, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES Das Williams, Chair SB 348 (Galgiani) - As Amended April 6, 2015 SENATE VOTE: 35-0 SUBJECT: California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: railroad crossings SUMMARY: Extends until 2019 the exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of the closure of a railroad grade crossing by order of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) when the PUC has found the crossing to present a threat to public safety. EXISTING LAW: 1)Requires lead agencies with the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a proposed project which may have a significant effect on the environment to prepare a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report (EIR) for this action, unless the project is exempt from CEQA (CEQA includes various statutory exemptions, as well as categorical exemptions in the CEQA guidelines). 2)Exempts from CEQA, until January 1, 2016, the closure of a SB 348 Page 2 railroad grade crossing by order of the PUC when the PUC has found the crossing to present a threat to public safety. Any crossing for high-speed rail is excluded. A state or local agency claiming the exemption is required to file a notice with the Office of Planning and Research (OPR). 3)Exempts from CEQA any railroad grade separation project which eliminates an existing grade crossing or which reconstructs an existing grade separation. 4)Grants the PUC exclusive authority over railroad crossings, including prescribing the terms of installation, operation, maintenance, use, and protection of each crossing, as well as requiring the closure or separation of grades at any crossing. THIS BILL: 1)Extends the sunset on the exemption for closure of a railroad grade crossing from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2019. 2)Requires a state or local agency claiming the grade separation exemption to file a notice with OPR. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs. COMMENTS: The sponsor of this bill, the PUC, has broad and exclusive power to regulate railroad crossings. According to the PUC, AB 660 (Galgiani), Chapter 315, Statutes of 2008, eliminated a provision from Section 2450 of the Streets and Highways Code which had described a grade separation project to include removal or relocation of highways or tracks to eliminate existing at-grade crossings. Section 21080.13 of CEQA exempts certain grade separation projects, and the PUC combined this exemption with the Streets and Highways definition to justify SB 348 Page 3 claiming a CEQA exemption for the closure of an at-grade crossing. To confirm its ability to claim a CEQA exemption for orders to close at-grade crossing found to be unsafe, the PUC sponsored AB 1665 (Galgiani), Chapter 721, Statutes of 2012, which created the exemption that is the subject of this bill. Since AB 1665 was enacted, the exemption has not been used. However, the exemption may be used for a pending railroad crossing project in Glendale. This bill extends the application of the exemption for three years so that it may be used for the Glendale project, as well as potential future projects. The exemption is limited, non-controversial, and appears appropriate under a circumstance where a railroad crossing must be closed quickly to protect public safety. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support Public Utilities Commission (sponsor) BNSF Railway Company California Short Line Railroad Association California Teamsters Public Affairs Council Union Pacific Railroad Company SB 348 Page 4 Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by:Lawrence Lingbloom / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092