BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                             Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
                            2015 - 2016  Regular  Session

          SB 369 (Block) - California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data  
          System:  pupils of military families
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Version: February 24, 2015      |Policy Vote: ED. 8 - 0          |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Urgency: No                     |Mandate: Yes                    |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Hearing Date: April 20, 2015    |Consultant: Mark McKenzie       |
          |                                |                                |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.







          Bill  
          Summary:  SB 369 adds an indicator to the California  
          Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) to identify  
          pupils of military families, and requires local educational  
          agencies (LEAs) to report enrollment of pupils of military  
          families, as specified. 


          Fiscal  
          Impact:  
           CALPADS - Minor General Fund costs to the California  
            Department of Education (CDE) to create a new indicator in  
            CALPADS to identify pupils of military families, and  
            communicate the new requirements to LEAs.







          SB 369 (Block)                                         Page 1 of  
          ?
          
          
           LEAs - Unknown, but potentially significant one-time mandated  
            costs on LEAs, reimbursable from the General Fund, for  
            approximately 1,000 schools districts to develop and implement  
            a local process for identifying and tracking pupils of  
            military families, and inputting that information into  
            CALPADS.  Likely minor, but potentially significant ongoing  
            mandated costs on LEAs for additional data entry to update  
            CALPADS. (see staff comments)


          Background:  Existing law provides for the development and implementation  
          of CALPADS to provide for the retention and analysis of  
          longitudinal pupil achievement data.  CALPADS was created to  
          enable CDE and LEAs to meet federal requirements established by  
          the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, which increases  
          accountability for student achievement.  The system was  
          developed and implemented using federal funds, and has been  
          operational since 2009.  CALPADS is accessible by CDE and LEAs  
          and contains student-level longitudinal information on  
          demographics, program participation, grade level, enrollment,  
          course enrollment and completion, discipline, statewide  
          assessments, and other data.


          Proposed Law:  
            SB 369 requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to  
          add a reporting process within CALPADS requiring LEAs to report  
          the enrollment of pupils of military families by July 1, 2016.   
          The bill requires CDE to include pupils of military families as  
          an indicator for purposes of collecting and reporting attendance  
          data, and prohibits data collected on pupils of military  
          families to be used to compile reports required under the NCLB  
          Act, including dropout and graduation rates.  SB 369 defines  
          "pupils of military families" to mean pupils whose parent or  
          legal guardian is an active duty member of the Armed Forces of  
          the United States.


          Related  
          Legislation:  AB 2341 (Quirk-Silva), which was held on this  
          Committee's Suspense File in 2014, is nearly identical to this  
          bill.










          SB 369 (Block)                                         Page 2 of  
          ?
          
          
          Staff  
          Comments:  This bill enacts new state and local data collection  
          requirements.  At the state level, CDE expects to incur minor  
          costs of approximately $10,000 to modify CALPADS to allow for  
          the collection of data identifying pupils of military families.   
          Costs to exclude this data from federal NCLB Act reports would  
          be minor and absorbable. 

          This bill also imposes a state mandate on LEAs which is likely  
          to be deemed by the Commission on State Mandates to be  
          reimbursable.  Schools districts will have to establish  
          procedures, collect information on whether or not pupils have a  
          parent or legal guardian who is an active duty member of the  
          military, and enter the data into CALPADS.  This information  
          will likely need to be collected annually to account for  
          enrollment changes and to determine whether a pupil's status as  
          a military family member changes based on his or her parent's  
          service status.  LEAs will likely be eligible for reimbursement  
          for staff time spent on training, data collection, and data  
          entry.  Reimbursable costs for mandated activities would be  
          subject to a determination by the Commission on State Mandates.   
          Staff estimates that reimbursements could be in the hundreds of  
          thousands of dollars initially, with lower ongoing costs once  
          procedures are in place.  Actual costs are unknown, but for  
          illustrative purposes, if an employee at each of California's  
          approximately 10,000 schools spent 1-2 hours per school year  
          collecting and entering this data, at an average staff time cost  
          of $50 per hour including benefits, annual costs would be in the  
          range of $500,000 to $1 million, reimbursable from the General  
          Fund.


          Staff notes that provisional language has been included in the  
          Budget Act in recent years to prohibit CDE, as a condition of  
          receiving specified federal funds, from adding new data elements  
          to CALPADS, requiring LEAs to use data collected through CALPADS  
          for any purpose, or otherwise expanding or enhancing the system  
          beyond current data elements and functionalities.  This language  
          is intended to limit the expansion of CALPADS beyond existing  
          federal and state requirements, and to minimize costs.  While  
          the 2015 Budget Act will not be approved until later in the  
          legislative session, SB 369 anticipates the inclusion of similar  
          provisional language in the Budget Act, and explicitly exempts  
          CDE from the penalty as a result of implementing the new data  








          SB 369 (Block)                                         Page 3 of  
          ?
          
          
          collection requirement specified in the bill. 




                                      -- END --