BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 369


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          369 (Block)


          As Amended  July 16, 2015


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  40-0


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Education       |7-0  |O'Donnell, Chávez,    |                    |
          |                |     |Kim, McCarty,         |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Thurmond,   |                    |
          |                |     |Weber                 |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0 |Gomez, Bigelow,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonta,         |                    |
          |                |     |Calderon, Chang,      |                    |
          |                |     |Nazarian, Eggman,     |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Holden,       |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Quirk, Rendon, |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 








                                                                     SB 369


                                                                    Page  2







          SUMMARY:  Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction  
          (SPI), on or before July 1, 2016, to add a reporting process  
          within the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System  
          (CALPADS) requiring local educational agencies to report the  
          enrollment of pupils of military families.  Specifically, this  
          bill: 
          1)Requires the California Department of Education (CDE) to  
            include military families as an indicator for purposes of a  
            currently-required quarterly report on student attendance.
          2)Specifies data collected for purposes of this bill shall not  
            be used to compile reports required by the federal No Child  
            Left Behind Act, including, but not limited to, dropout and  
            graduation rates.


          3)Specifies that implementation of this bill shall not subject  
            the CDE to a loss of funding pursuant to provisional budget  
            language in the 2015 Budget Act that prohibits additional  
            components to be added to CALPADS.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1)General Fund administrative costs of approximately $15,000 to  
            CDE to modify CALPADS to include a new indicator for students  
            of military families. 


          2)Unknown Proposition 98 (1988)/General Fund costs for local  
            educational agencies (LEAs) to update user interface with  
            CALPADS and collect and report this data to CALPADS. For  
            illustration, assuming approximately 10,000 schools dedicated  
            one hour of staff time collecting and entering data, statewide  
            costs would be approximately $500,000.  The requirements in  
            the bill impose a state mandate on LEAs which is likely to be  








                                                                     SB 369


                                                                    Page  3





            deemed by the Commission on State Mandates to be reimbursable.  
             


          





          COMMENTS:


          Purpose.  Currently, there is no method of tracking attendance  
          of students of military families.  Supporters state that  
          including an indicator in CALPADS would build awareness of  
          students that may be affected by the deployment of a parent and  
          facilitate data-driven decision making to improve the  
          distribution of Department of Defense funding and local  
          resources to offer appropriate support.


          Budget conflict.  The CDE indicates that the change required by  
          this bill is relatively simple and could probably be achieved in  
          approximately one year.  However, the 2015-16 Budget Act  
          prohibits the CDE from adding additional data elements to  
          CALPADS.  Specifically, provisional language states, "As a  
          further condition of receiving these [federal] funds, the SDE  
          shall not add additional data elements to CALPADS, require local  
          educational agencies to use the data collected through the  
          CALPADS for any purpose, or otherwise expand or enhance the  
          system beyond the data elements and functionalities that are  
          identified in the most current approved Feasibility Study and  
          Special Project Reports and the CALPADS Data guide v4.1."  This  
          bill contains a provision that exempts its requirements from  
          this Budget Act prohibition.


          Prior legislation.  This bill is substantially similar to AB  








                                                                     SB 369


                                                                    Page  4





          2431 (Quirk-Silva) of 2014, which was held on the Suspense file  
          in the Senate Appropriations Committee.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
          Rick Pratt / ED. / (916) 319-2087  FN: 0001628