BILL ANALYSIS Ó
SB 371
Page 1
SENATE THIRD READING
SB
371 (Hancock)
As Amended April 6, 2015
Majority vote
SENATE VOTE: 30-3
------------------------------------------------------------------
|Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
|----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
|Revenue & |6-1 |Ting, Dababneh, |Patterson |
|Taxation | |Gipson, | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | |Roger Hernández, | |
| | |Mullin, Quirk | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Clarifies that a school district may exempt from
special taxes any of the specified categories of individuals and
is not required, but may, provide this exemption to all of these
persons. Specifically, this bill:
SB 371
Page 2
1)Clarifies that a school district is authorized to exempt from
the qualified special taxes any or all of the following
persons:
a) Persons over the age of 65;
b) Persons receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for
a disability; or,
c) Persons receiving Social Security Disability Insurance
(SSDI) benefits whose annual income is less than 250% of
2012 federal poverty guidelines.
2)States that the proposed clarification is declaratory of
existing law.
FISCAL EFFECT: None
COMMENTS:
1)Author's Statement. The author has provided the following
statement in support of this bill:
"Existing law allows school districts and community college
districts to impose special taxes (parcel taxes) that apply to
taxpayers or real property within the school district. K-12
school districts may exempt persons 65 years of age (or
older), persons receiving supplemental security income (SSI)
regardless of age, and/or persons receiving Social Security
Disability Insurance (SSDI).
SB 371
Page 3
"In 2011, SB 874 (Hancock) [Chapter 791, Statutes of 2012]
gave school districts the option of exempting property owners
receiving SSDI from paying parcel taxes, but in 2015 the Santa
Clara County Counsel's office raised an issue with this new
exemption. The Santa Clara County Counsel's office
interpreted Government Code Section 50079(b)(1) which states,
'all of the following taxpayers,' to mean that an individual
must meet all three categories to qualify for a parcel tax
exemption. An interpretation that goes against the intention
of SB 874.
"SB 371 clarifies that school districts can provide the
exemption to 'any or all' of the exempted categories of
taxpayers."
2)"Qualified Special Taxes": Background. In 1978, Proposition
13 limited both the tax rates and assessments, thus
significantly reducing property tax revenues. Proposition 13
also eliminated the ability of school districts to levy an
incremental ad valorem tax on real property. However, school
districts still have limited authority to generate local
revenues from qualified special taxes as long as the special
tax applies uniformly to all taxpayers (other than persons
over the age of 65 or persons receiving SSI or SSDI) and real
property within the district. While Proposition 13 did not
define the term "special tax", over time the courts have
opined that a tax is a "special tax" whenever expenditure of
its revenues is limited to specific purposes, i.e. the
proceeds of the tax are earmarked or dedicated in some manner
to a specific project or projects. In contrast, a tax is a
"general tax" only when its revenues are placed into the
General Fund and are available for expenditure for any and all
governmental purposes. [Bay Area Cellular Telephone Co. v.
City of Union City (2008) 162 Cal. App.4th 686; Howard Jarvis
Taxpayers Assn. v. City of Roseville (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th
1178.] School districts and special districts are prohibited
SB 371
Page 4
from imposing general taxes (Proposition 218 of 1996) and
thus, by definition, any tax levied by a school district or
community school district is considered to be a special tax
subject to a two-thirds voter approval. Thus far, school
districts have only imposed "qualified special taxes" under
Government Code Section 50079 in the form of a parcel tax.
3)Parcel Taxes. A parcel tax is a flat fee imposed by a city,
county, or special district on each parcel, residential as
well as commercial, rather than on the assessed value of
property located within the local entity's jurisdiction.
Because the same dollar amount of tax is assessed on each
parcel of property, whether the parcel is one acre or 100
acres, parcel taxes are generally regressive, which means
owners of smaller parcels of land pay a larger percentage of
tax as compared to owners of larger parcels of land. Some
districts levy a rate at a fixed amount per square foot of
taxable land, and many include an annual inflation adjustment.
Parcel taxes are flexible ways of raising revenues at the
local level, but are subject to certain requirements.
Existing law does not prescribe a maximum rate of tax nor does
it limit the period within which the qualified special tax may
be imposed. Therefore, the rate of tax varies significantly
among different school districts. Existing law does not limit
how the special tax proceeds may be spent and, therefore, a
local school board can specify in the ballot measure how the
funds will be used. Generally, local parcel taxes provide
secure funding for teacher salaries; books; materials and
supplies; computers; and art, music and sports programs.
4)The Current Exemption: What is the Problem? School districts
and community college districts are currently authorized to
exempt from qualified special taxes persons over the age of
65, persons receiving SSI for a disability, regardless of age,
and persons receiving SSDI, with a specified maximum annual
income. The exemption is permissive rather than mandatory,
which allows the school district to consider the need for, and
SB 371
Page 5
impact of, an exemption from special taxes imposed.
The original exemption enacted in 1988 was limited in its
scope to senior citizens over the age of 65. In 2006, the
Legislature expanded the exemption to include persons
receiving SSI, regardless of age, and clearly allowed school
districts to exempt either persons over the age of 65 or
persons receiving SSI. In 2012, the Legislature added one
more category to the exemption list of persons - namely
persons receiving SSDI, with a specified annual income (SB 874
(Hancock), Chapter 791, Statutes 2012). However, as SB 874
was going through the legislative process, a drafting error
occurred and the word "or" was replaced with the phrase "all
of the following." As a result, some interpret the statute to
require a school district to exempt either none or all three
categories of individuals eligible for the exemption. This
bill would clarify that this interpretation is incorrect and,
thus, a school district may exempt any or all of the
individuals currently eligible for the exemption from the
qualified special tax.
Analysis Prepared by:
Oksana Jaffe / REV. & TAX. / (916) 319-2098 FN:
0001072
SB 371
Page 6