BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 376 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 376 (Lara) As Amended August 18, 2015 Majority vote SENATE VOTE: 24-14 ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Higher |9-3 |Medina, Bloom, Irwin, |Baker, Chávez, | |Education | | |Harper | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Jones-Sawyer, Levine, | | | | |Linder, Santiago, | | | | |Weber, Williams | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Accountability |6-3 |Salas, Burke, |Lackey, Brough, | | | |Frazier, Irwin, |Beth Gaines | | | |Medina, Rodriguez | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |12-5 |Gomez, Bloom, Bonta, |Bigelow, Chang, | | | |Calderon, Nazarian, |Gallagher, Jones, | | | |Eggman, Eduardo |Wagner | SB 376 Page 2 | | |Garcia, Holden, | | | | |Quirk, Rendon, Weber, | | | | |Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY: Requires bidders on University of California (UC) contracts for specified types of personal services to certify that their employees' total compensation does not undercut the compensation of UC employees doing comparable work. Specifically, this bill: 1)Applies the cost standard described above to the following types of contracts: building maintenance, cleaning or custodial services, call centers services, clerical services, dining and food service, gardening, grounds keeping, and plant nursery services, laborer services, mailroom services, parking, shuttle bus, truck driving or transportation services, security services, storekeeper services, patient care technical employee services, patient billing services, medical transcribing services, patient escort services, or nursing assistance services. 2)Requires a bidder to certify that its total employee compensation package, including fringe benefits and valued on a per-employee basis, does not materially undercut UC's total compensation for employees doing comparable work at the relevant campus, medical center, or laboratory. 3)Requires UC to include in its request for proposals, a calculation of the average per-employee value of total compensation for UC employees relevant to a particular contract, and to incorporate all known cost escalators for projecting the rate of growth of average per-employee SB 376 Page 3 compensation. 4)Stipulates that the current requirement that UC service contracts - other than for personal or professional services - involving expenditures of $100,000 or more annually be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, includes the renewal or extension of such contracts. EXISTING LAW: 1)Outlines the requirements and procedures for competitive bidding at the UC; and, outlines requirements and procedures, specifically for the acquisition of materials, goods, and services (Public Contract Code (PCC) Section 10500, et seq.). 2)Declares the intent of the Legislature to facilitate the participation of small businesses, particularly small disadvantaged or minority business enterprises, women business enterprises, and disabled veteran business enterprises in business contracting with the UC (PCC Section 10500.5). 3)Requires the UC to let any contract involving an expenditure of $100,000 or more annually for goods and materials, or for services to be performed (other than personal or professional services) to the lowest responsible bidder (PCC Section 10507.7). 4)Authorizes the UC, when it determines that it can expect long-term savings, as specified, to select the lowest responsible bidder on the basis of the best value to the university (PCC Section 10507.8). SB 376 Page 4 FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the UC estimates that, of its total annual spending on service contracts ($1.2 billion), about $120 million, or 10%, are for the specific types of services that would be subject to the requirements of this bill. Assuming a 30% increase in costs related to providing parity in benefits, total annual costs would be $36 million. The additional costs to provide wage parity, assuming a 10% to 20% cost impact, would be $12 million to $24 million. This impact should diminish over time due to implementation of UC's Fair Wage/Fair Work plan, which will be applied to new contracts and as existing contracts are renewed/extended. These costs will come from a variety of UC fund sources, including the State General Fund, federal funds, auxiliary funds, and enterprise funds, such as from the medical centers. COMMENTS: Background. According to a 2012 UC Berkeley Labor Center report, entitled, "Temporary Workers in California are Twice as Likely as Non-Temps to Live in Poverty: Problems with Temporary and Subcontracted Work in California," in California almost one-quarter of a million people worked in the temporary help services industry in 2010. The report finds that temporary and subcontracted workers on a whole, are more likely to be female, less likely to be white non-Hispanic, and less likely to have a high school diploma or equivalency certificate than the average non-temporary employee. Additionally, the report finds that temporary and subcontracted employees are twice as likely as non-temporary employees to live in poverty, receive food stamps, and be on Medicaid. The report finds that temporary and subcontracted employees earned roughly 18% less than equivalent non-temporary employees of the same age, gender, and ability. The report also finds that temporary and subcontracted employees were also more susceptible to workplace illness and injury, and SB 376 Page 5 were less likely to get benefits. The report notes that lowered wages mean that temporary and subcontracted employees rely more on the state safety net than their direct-hire counterparts and that these employment arrangements undermine worker protections by allowing employers to avoid certain provisions of worker protection; making it difficult to enforce other protections. Lastly, the report finds that these employment relationships create downward pressure on wages. Need for the measure. According to the author, "SB 376 seeks to address the growing challenge to California of the use of contingent workers to replace employees, and the consequential effect it has on wages and worker protections." The author contends that this measure will ensure that the UC evaluates the total employee compensation package of bids for contract work in order to ensure that employment that is contracted out to contingent workers does not, "undercut the value of existing university employees." Fair Wage/Fair Work plan. The UC announced its Fair Wage/Fair Work plan in July, which will establish the minimum wage for contract workers at $13 per hour starting October 2015, increasing to $15 per hour as of October 1, 2017. This plan will also involve a monitoring and compliance program to ensure contractors are complying with UC policies and all federal, state, and local laws. Finally, the program will include annual compensation audits of all contracts and spot audits of selected contracts. The UC contends that this plan "substantially addresses the concerns that prompted the introduction of SB 376, in a way that is financially feasible to the university." To note, according to the UC, some of its collective bargaining agreements contain provisions stating that the UC will not contract out for services solely on the basis that savings will result from lower contractor pay rates and benefits for services customarily performed by bargaining unit employees or that SB 376 Page 6 result in layoff of bargaining unit employees. These agreements specify the instances in which UC may contract out for services including, when there is a need for special expertise or experience, for short-term or temporary staffing needs, for special services and equipment that are not available internally, or for services at a leased facility where the services are provided by the owner. Arguments in support. According to the California Labor Federation, the UC continues to contribute to the problem of regularly relying on a "subcontracted worker model, risking the jobs and putting downward pressure on wages of direct hire employees." The Labor Federation contends that, "SB 376 implements improved standards to pay its subcontracted employees at a level that does not undercut the wages of comparable regular UC employees in order for that bidder to qualify as a 'lowest responsible bidder' or best value awardee." Arguments in opposition. The UC argues that, in addition to increasing costs, the bill will create administrative burdens, in part by requiring an analysis to determine per-employee compensation for every type of contract and factoring in all known cost escalators to project future per-employee costs. Additionally, the UC contends that the bill will hinder its ability to make its contracting more efficient by using systemwide rather than site-specific contracts. Analysis Prepared by: Jeanice Warden / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960 FN: 0001650 SB 376 Page 7