BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 385 Page 1 Date of Hearing: July 15, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair SB 385 (Hueso) - As Amended June 18, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Environmental Safety and Toxic |Vote:|7 - 0 | |Committee: |Materials | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | |Judiciary | |10 - 0 | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: Yes State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This urgency bill allows the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to grant a public water system additional time to meet the drinking water standard for hexavalent chromium by approving SB 385 Page 2 a compliance plan. Specifically, this bill: 1)Outlines the mandatory components of a compliance plan that may be submitted to the SWRCB by a public water system requesting an extension. 2)Authorizes the SWRCB to review, provide comment and approve the compliance plan, and determine the earliest feasible compliance date prior to January 1, 2020. 3)Requires a public water system to provide customers with specified written notices at least twice a year. Requires the public water system to submit written status reports to the SWRCB, as specified. 4)Specifies that during the compliance plan implementation period, the public water system shall not be deemed in violation of the drinking water standard. FISCAL EFFECT: Minor and absorbable costs. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. The regulation establishing the drinking water standard for hexavalent chromium required public water systems to begin monitoring for hexavalent chromium by January 1, 2015 - six months after the regulation went into effect. According to the bill's sponsor, the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA), this short timeframe does not recognize the complex steps water systems must take to come into compliance, which might involve constructing expensive new treatment SB 385 Page 3 facilities. This bill provides a time-limited process for a water system to achieve compliance without being deemed in violation, as long as strict safeguards are met. 2)Background. The SWRCB is responsible for adopting standards for contaminants in drinking water, and owners of public water systems are required to comply with these standards. The Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL), set by the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) for drinking water quality, is the maximum amount of a substance that is allowed in public drinking water systems under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Hexavalent chromium - an inorganic contaminant that can increase cancer risks - has been found in a number of California's public drinking water sources. US EPA has not yet set an MCL for hexavalent chromium. However, in California, a newly adopted MCL for hexavalent chromium of 0.01 mg/l (10 parts per billion) became effective in July 2014. This regulation requires public water systems to initiate monitoring for hexavalent chromium on or before January 1, 2015. The public water systems argue that additional time is necessary to obtain financing and design and construct treatment systems. This urgency bill establishes a time-limited process for assisting public water systems to achieve compliance with the state's MCL hexavalent chromium regulations. 3)Related Legislation. SB 351 (Orbitz), Chap. 602, Stats. 2001) directed the Department of Health Services to establish a SB 385 Page 4 primary drinking water standard for hexavalent chromium on or before January 1, 2004. Analysis Prepared by:Nikita Koraddi/ Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916) 319-2081