BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 412


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          412 (Glazer and De León)


          As Amended  August 15, 2016


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  36-0


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Higher          |13-0 |Medina, Baker, Bloom, |                    |
          |Education       |     |Chávez, Irwin,        |                    |
          |                |     |Jones-Sawyer, Levine, |                    |
          |                |     |Linder, Low, Olsen,   |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Weber,      |                    |
          |                |     |Williams              |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Holden,       |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Obernolte,     |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood,  |                    |








                                                                     SB 412


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |McCarty               |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Establishes the California Promise to support students  
          who enroll in the campuses of the California State University  
          (CSU) as freshmen in obtaining baccalaureate degrees within four  
          academic years, and as transfer students within two academic  
          years, as applicable.  Specifically, this bill:  


          1)Requires the trustees of the CSU to develop and implement the  
            California Promise to, commencing with the 2017-18 fiscal  
            year, ensure a minimum of eight campuses establish a program  
            to enter into a pledge with a qualifying freshman student to  
            support the student in obtaining a baccalaureate degree within  
            four academic years; and, ensure a minimum of 15 campuses  
            establish a program to enter into a pledge with a qualifying  
            transfer student to support the student in obtaining a  
            baccalaureate degree program within two academic years.   
            Commencing with the 2018-19 fiscal year, CSU Trustees are  
            required to increase, by a minimum of five campuses for a  
            total minimum of 20 campuses, the number of transfer student  
            Promise programs. 


          2)Requires a qualifying student to be a California resident for  
            purposes of in-state tuition eligibility and complete at least  
            30 semester units (or quarter equivalent) per academic year;  
            and, requires each program to be reviewed by a graduation  
            initiative advisory committee of that campus or a committee  
            designated with similar functions.  Requires the committee to  
            ensure the goals of the program and implementation steps lead  
            to increasing the campus' four-year graduation rates for  
            students who enrolled as first-time freshman and two-year  
            graduation rates for transfer students, as applicable.   
            Requires the committee to develop additional eligibility  








                                                                     SB 412


                                                                    Page  3





            requirements to prioritize specific populations that have  
            lower four-year graduation rates, including, but not limited  
            to students who receive financial aid, underrepresented  
            students, and first generation college students. 


          3)Establishes Legislative intent that the California Promise  
            programs gradually scale up to accommodate as many students  
            into the program as feasible and in consideration of available  
            funding.


          4)Requires support provided by a CSU campus to a California  
            Promise program student to include, at least, priority  
            registration in coursework, as specified, and academic  
            advisement that includes monitoring the student's academic  
            progress.


          5)Requires the CSU Trustees to report to the appropriate policy  
            and fiscal committees of the Legislature by July 1, 2019, on  
            program enrollment, as specified, and by July 1, 2021, on  
            program outcomes, as specified.  Requires the CSU Trustees to  
            report by March 15, 2017, regarding potential financial  
            incentives that can benefit students that participate in  
            California Promise programs, as specified.


          6)Provides that a student who successfully completes his or her  
            associate degree for transfer at a California Community  
            College shall be guaranteed participation in the Promise  
            program at the CSU transfer campus, if established. 


          7)Sunsets the provisions of this bill on January 1, 2024.


          EXISTING LAW:   









                                                                     SB 412


                                                                    Page  4






          1)Establishes the Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act and  
            requires California Community College (CCC) districts to  
            develop and grant a transfer associate degree that deems the  
            student eligible for transfer into the CSU, when the student  
            meets specified course requirements (Education (EC) Section  
            66746).  The CSU is required to guarantee admission with  
            junior status to any community college student who meets  
            specified requirements, but provides that the student is not  
            guaranteed admission for specific majors or campuses.  (EC  
            Section 66747).


          2)Requires CSU and CCC districts, and requests the University of  
            California (UC) to give priority for registration for  
            enrollment to the following:


             a)   Any member or former member of the Armed Forces, as  
               defined, who is a resident of California and who has  
               received an honorable discharge, a general discharge, or an  
               other than honorable discharge for any academic term  
               attended at one of these institutions within four years of  
               leaving state or federal active duty, if the institution  
               already administers a priority enrollment system.  Current  
               law further requires that the veteran use this benefit  
               within 15 years of leaving state or federal active duty and  
               requires that these students comply with student  
               responsibilities established by the Student Success Act of  
               2012.  (EC Section 66025.8)


             b)   If the institution already administers a priority  
               enrollment system for registration, to any current or  
               former foster youth.  (EC Section 66025.9) 


             c)   CCC districts that administer a priority enrollment  
               system for registration to grant priority registration for  








                                                                     SB 412


                                                                    Page  5





               enrollment to students in the Extended Opportunity Program  
               and Services and to disabled students.  (EC Section  
               66025.91)


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1)CSU indicates that four campuses (Fresno, Fullerton, Cal Poly  
            Pomona, and San Bernardino) have four-year pledge programs  
            similar to what is proposed in this bill for incoming  
            freshman.  Administrative costs to replicate this model at  
            four additional campuses would be in the range of $300,000 to  
            $450,000 annually.  [General Fund]


          2)CSU also indicates that one of four campuses in the system  
            that has over 1,000 Associate Degree for Transfer (ADT)  
            students already has a two-year pledge program serving these  
            students.  Costs for the two-year pledge program at these four  
            campuses will total $300,000 to $400,000 and for 16 additional  
            campuses, with smaller numbers of ADT students, will be  
            between $300,000 and $800,000, for total costs of $600,000 to  
            $1.2 million for the two-year pledge programs. [General Fund]


          3)Costs for the legislative reports will be about $100,000.  
            [General Fund]


          COMMENTS:  Purpose of this bill.  According to the author,  
          "despite the proven track record as a leader in higher  
          education, the CSU's four-year graduation rate continues to lag  
          behind the rest of the nation.  According to the CSU, the most  
          recent nationally-comparable data shows their overall four-year  
          graduation rate was 16.2% for the Fall 2008 cohort of  
          first-time, full-time freshmen, well below the national rate of  
          24.9% among similar public institutions.  The most recent  








                                                                     SB 412


                                                                    Page  6





          American Freshman Survey from the Higher Education Research  
          Institute at UCLA [University of California, Los Angeles], which  
          found that 84% of freshmen entering public colleges expect to  
          graduate in four years, demonstrates the clear gap between  
          expectation and reality.  Finishing in four years saves students  
          and their families tens of thousands of dollars."


          The author believes the California Promise programs established  
          by this bill "will increase the CSU's four-year graduation rate,  
          lower cost and debt obligations of students and their families,  
          and ensure the number of CSU degrees is expanded to meet the  
          needs of California employers."


          CSU promise programs.  Information provided by the CSU shows  
          that four campuses currently have pledge programs (Cal Poly  
          Pomona, Fresno, Fullerton, and San Bernardino).  Generally,  
          these programs, some of which date back to 2007, operate  
          consistently with the requirements of this bill.  The overall  
          results of programs are mixed.  While four-year graduation rates  
          for program participants are much higher than the undergraduate  
          student populations that do not participate in the programs,  
          attrition rates are also high (sometimes 50% or more).  In  
          addition, some campuses have discontinued programs due to low  
          student participation.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960  FN:  
          0004068














                                                                     SB 412


                                                                    Page  7