BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 414|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 414
Author: Jackson (D)
Amended: 9/4/15
Vote: 21
PRIOR SENATE VOTES NOT RELEVANT
SENATE NATURAL RES. & WATER COMMITTEE: 6-2, 9/10/15 (pursuant
to Senate Rule 29.10)
AYES: Pavley, Allen, Hueso, Jackson, Monning, Wolk
NOES: Stone, Vidak
NO VOTE RECORDED: Hertzberg
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 9/8/15 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Oil spill response
SOURCE: Environmental Defense Center
Environmental Action Committee of West Marin
DIGEST: This bill makes several changes to state law regarding
oil spill preparedness, prevention and response.
Assembly Amendments delete the previous Senate version of the
bill, related to marriage, and instead add the current language.
ANALYSIS:
SB 414
Page 2
Existing federal law addresses oil spills in the navigable
waters of the United States through the creation of a
comprehensive prevention, response, liability and compensation
program through the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, as amended. This
law assigned numerous duties to the U.S. Coast Guard related to
oil spills and increased federal oversight of maritime
transportation.
Existing federal regulation establishes Regional Response Teams
representing different geographic regions to support emergency
response. Team membership includes representatives of both
federal and state entities with relevant expertise and the team
provides regional planning and coordination of preparedness and
response actions, including to oil spills (see Title 40, Code of
Federal Regulations, section 300.115). Through the required
planning processes information regarding the appropriate use of
chemical dispersants and other agents to control oil spills must
be developed.
Existing state law:
1)Establishes the Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill Prevention
and Response Act (SB 2040, Chapter 1248, Statutes of 1990), as
amended. This Act created the Office of Spill Prevention and
Response (OSPR) in the Department of Fish and Wildlife.
2)Establishes OSPR's mission to provide the best achievable
protection of California's natural resources and the public
health and safety by preventing, preparing for, and responding
to spills of oil and other deleterious materials to all waters
of the state, and to restore and enhance affected resources.
3)Provides for the appointment of the OSPR administrator
(administrator) to lead OSPR.
4)Establishes the Oil Spill Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
SB 414
Page 3
with specified membership to provide public input and
independent judgment of the actions of the administrator.
5)Provides for the possibility of both criminal and civil
remedies in the event of an oil spill. The amount of an
administrative civil penalty for an oil spill is based on the
volume of oil spilled reduced by the amount of oil cleaned up.
This bill makes several changes to state law regarding oil spill
preparedness, prevention and response. Specifically, this bill:
1)Requires the administrator to:
a) Arrange drills and exercises with the U.S. Coast Guard,
as specified.
b) Consult peer-reviewed scientific literature with respect
to studies of chemical dispersants and to ask that the
California Dispersant Plan be updated by May 1, 2016. The
studies are expanded to include bioremediation and
biological agents in addition to dispersants and other
chemical agents.
c) Provide written notification, as specified, to the
Legislature within three days of use of dispersants in an
oil spill.
d) Report to the Legislature, as specified, on the
effectiveness of the use of dispersants on oil spill
response within two months of their use.
e) Support the Regional Response Team in its efforts to
update chemical dispersant use plans, as specifies.
SB 414
Page 4
f) Submit a report to the Legislature by January 1, 2017
assessing best achievable technology of equipment for oil
spill prevention, preparedness and response. This shall
include an assessment of a new method - estimated recovery
system potential - for evaluating oil skimmers.
g) Update regulations governing the adequacy of oil spill
contingency plans for best achievable technologies for oil
spill prevention and response by July 1, 2018, as
specified.
h) Direct the Harbor Safety Committees to assess the
presence and capability of tugs in certain areas to provide
emergency towing of vessels, as specified. San Francisco
Bay and Los Angeles/Long Beach harbor assessment shall be
completed by May 1, 2016 and other harbors by January 1,
2020.
2)Requires the TAC to convene a taskforce with specified
membership to evaluate and make recommendations on the use of
"vessels of opportunity", such as commercial fishing vessels,
to respond to oil spills in marine waters. The evaluation
shall include certain topics and include two public meetings.
The TAC shall make a recommendation to the administrator by
January 1, 2017. If necessary, the administrator shall update
regulations by January 1, 2018 to include vessels of
opportunity.
3)Deletes the provision requiring the administrative civil
penalty take into consideration how much oil was cleaned up.
4)Deletes obsolete provisions.
Background
SB 414
Page 5
The Refugio Beach spill. On May 19, 2015 a pipeline owned by
Houston-based Plains All American Pipeline ruptured spilling
(according to the operator) up to an estimated 140,000 gallons
of heavy crude oil along the Gaviota coast at Refugio Beach in
Santa Barbara County. The release was from a 10.6 mile long,
24-inch diameter pipeline and (according to the operator) as
much as 21,000 gallons of oil ended up in coastal waters. News
reports indicate the pipeline was potentially severely corroded
where it ruptured.
The main oil spill stretched over 9 miles of California
coastline and tar balls associated with the spill were found,
according to news reports, as far south as Los Angeles County.
Shoreline and beaches were affected by the spill and nesting
areas for protected species were also affected. Approximately
250 birds and 170 mammals in addition to a large number of
marine invertebrates were known to be impacted by the spill.
Although some of the birds and mammals have been released
following treatment, most are dead. A 23 mile by 6 mile area
was closed to fishing for over one month and beaches were
closed, including over the Memorial Day weekend, resulting in
economic losses. The fishery and beaches have since re-opened.
The clean-up is in its third phase with Shoreline Cleanup
Assessment Technique teams continuing to survey and monitor the
impacted area. The Natural Resources Damage Assessment has
begun. The spill and the events leading up to the spill remain
under investigation.
The use of chemical dispersants in oil spill response.
According to an OSPR fact sheet, dispersants are usually not
applied to oil spills in near shore areas, for example, where
sea grass beds, oyster beds, mariculture or coral reefs are
present. The fact sheet further states that spill responders
are generally "reluctant" to use dispersants in shallow waters
less than 30 feet deep. Chemical dispersants were not used in
the response to the Refugio Beach spill which occurred in near
shore shallow waters.
The California Dispersant Plan is part of federal oil spill
SB 414
Page 6
contingency planning. In general dispersant use is pre-approved
in federal waters outside National Marine Sanctuaries and more
than 3 miles away from the California/Oregon and
California/Mexico borders. For state waters and in other areas,
there is a process established by which dispersants may, on a
case-by-case basis, be used. The California Dispersant Plan
notes that the U.S. Coast Guard, the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, other federal entities and OSPR "agree that
one of the primary methods of controlling discharged oil shall
be the physical removal of the oil by mechanical means."
Dispersants are not without risks. For example, following the
unprecedented use - both in volume and duration - of chemical
dispersants following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill in the
Gulf of Mexico, new research, published in the peer-reviewed
scientific literature, has shown that the dispersants, alone or
in combination with spilled oil, are more toxic to at least some
species than the spilled oil by itself. That said it is
important to acknowledge that oil spills, in addition to
short-term impacts on impacted wildlife may also have long-term
effects on affected species. Recent work, for example, has
shown that a delayed effect of the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill is
likely to include significant subsequent salmon and herring
population declines in the Prince William Sound. Embryonic
salmon and herring exposed to very low concentrations of crude
oil developed heart defects which likely impacted their chances
for survival.
Oil spill response equipment evaluation. The Ocean Studies Board
of the National Research Council in November 2013 found that a
new method proposed for estimating the efficiency of oil
skimmers - the estimated recovery system potential or ERSP - to
be "basically sound and a substantial improvement over method
currently employed" by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement (BSEE - one of the federal offshore oil regulators).
The Ocean Studies Board provided further recommendations on how
best to implement this method.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
SB 414
Page 7
Com.:YesLocal: No
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee (on a
previous version of the bill), the fiscal impact of this bill is
increased one-time and ongoing costs in the range of several
million dollars (general and/or special fund) for the Department
of Fish and Wildlife to implement the requirements of the bill.
SUPPORT: (Verified9/1/15)
Audobon California
Azul
Black Surfers Collective
California Coastal Protection Network
California League of Conservation Voters
California Environmental Justice Alliance
Center for Biological Diversity
Clean Water Action
Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation
Defenders of Wildlife
Environment California
Environmental Action Committee of West Marin
Environmental Defense Center
Friends of the Earth
City of Goleta
Heal the Bay
Humboldt Baykeeper
National Parks Conservation Association
Natural Resources Defense Council
Ocean Conservancy
Pacific Merchant Shipping Association
Planning and Conservation League
San Francisco Bar Pilots Association
Santa Barbara Channelkeeper
Sierra Club California
Surfrider Foundation
Surfrider Foundation, South Bay Chapter
Surfrider Foundation, Santa Barbara Chapter
SB 414
Page 8
the Trust for Public Land
the Wildlands Conservancy
OPPOSITION: (Verified9/4/15)
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the author, "On May 19
of this year, tragedy struck again when an onshore pipeline
carrying crude oil ruptured and spilled over 100,000 gallons of
oil, over 20,000 gallons of which ended up in the ocean off the
Santa Barbara Coastline. To date this spill has caused
significant negative impacts to the ocean, local beaches,
wildlife, and the local economy. Although the investigation in
the response and the oil spill - dubbed the Refugio Oil Spill -
is ongoing, several deficiencies in our ability to immediately
response to these disasters and act quickly to protect our
environment have been highlighted."
"SB 414 will help make oil spill response faster, more
effective, and more environmentally friendly."
The San Francisco Bar Pilots Association adds that this bill
"would require {OSPR} to improve its voluntary program for local
fishermen and women to utilize their vessels and experience with
local waters to be trained as first responders to oil spills."
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 9/08/15
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom,
Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang,
Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd,
Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia,
Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray,
SB 414
Page 9
Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones,
Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low,
Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin,
Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea,
Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago,
Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber,
Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NO VOTE RECORDED: Chávez
Prepared by:Katharine Moore / N.R. & W. / (916) 651-4116
9/10/15 23:34:42
**** END ****