BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Session SB 421 (Hancock) Version: May 4, 2015 Hearing Date: May 12, 2015 Fiscal: Yes Urgency: No TMW SUBJECT Refineries: turnarounds DESCRIPTION This bill would delete the requirement that the court award attorneys' fees to the party who prevails in an action to compel or prohibit the disclosure of petroleum refinery turnaround information by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health. This bill would also clarify that a petroleum refinery employer or a person requesting the disclosure of turnaround information may intervene in an action to prohibit or compel the disclosure of the turnaround information. BACKGROUND Existing law, the California Refinery and Chemical Plant Worker Safety Act of 1990, (AB 3672 (Elder, Chapter 1632, Statutes of 1990)), establishes specified process safety management standards for refineries that handle acutely hazardous material in order to prevent or minimize the consequences of catastrophic releases of toxic, flammable, or explosive chemicals and promote worker safety through implementation of training and process safety management in refineries and other facilities. Last year, SB 1300 (Hancock, Chapter 519, Statutes of 2014) supplemented those safety standards by establishing disclosure requirements and inspections of a petroleum refinery employer for planned turnarounds (a planned, periodic shutdown of a refinery process unit or plant) to perform maintenance, overhaul, and repair operations and to inspect, test, and SB 421 (Hancock) Page 2 of ? replace process materials and equipment, as specified. SB 1300 prohibited disclosure of trade secret information contained in the turnaround reports and provided a method for judicial review of nondisclosure of claimed trade secret information. SB 1300 also authorized the court to award attorney's fees and costs to the prevailing party. However, the Governor's signing message instructed the author to introduce a cleanup bill and work with stakeholders to ensure that a petroleum refinery employer could not receive an award of attorney's fees from individuals and organizations seeking those records. This bill seeks to respond to the Governor's signing message of SB 1300 by removing the award of attorney's fees to a prevailing party in an action challenging disclosure of the turnaround information. This bill would also clarify that a petroleum refinery employer or a person requesting the disclosure of turnaround information may intervene in an action to prohibit or compel the disclosure of the turnaround information. CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW Existing law , the California Constitution, declares the people's right to transparency in government. ("The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business, and therefore, the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies shall be open to public scrutiny....") (Cal. Const., art. I, Sec. 3.) Existing law , the California Public Records Act (CPRA), governs the disclosure of information collected and maintained by public agencies. (Gov. Code Sec. 6250 et seq.) Generally, all public records are accessible to the public upon request, unless the record requested is exempt from public disclosure. (Gov. Code Sec. 6254.) There are 30 general categories of documents or information that are exempt from disclosure, essentially due to the character of the information, and unless it is shown that the public's interest in disclosure outweighs the public's interest in non-disclosure of the information, the exempt information may be withheld by the public agency with custody of the information. Existing law provides a list of information contained in a public record that may be exempt from public disclosure. Existing law provides that the listing of a statute in this article does not itself create an exemption, and requesters of SB 421 (Hancock) Page 3 of ? public records and public agencies are cautioned to review the applicable statute to determine the extent to which the statute, in light of the circumstances surrounding the request, exempts public records from disclosure. (Gov. Code Sec. 6275.) Included in the list of exemptions are occupational safety and health investigations, confidentiality of trade secrets. (Gov. Code Secs. 6276.32, 6276.44.) Existing law provides that any person may institute proceedings for injunctive or declarative relief or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce his or her right to inspect or to receive a copy of any public record or class of public records and authorizes an award of court costs and reasonable attorney fees to the plaintiff should the plaintiff prevail in litigation, and those costs and fees are required to be paid by the public agency, as specified. (Gov. Code Secs. 6258, 6259(d).) Existing law , every September 15, requires every petroleum refinery employer to submit to the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) a full schedule of planned turnarounds for all affected units for the following calendar year, and, at the request of Cal/OSHA, at least 60 days prior to the shutdown of a process unit or plant as part of a planned turnaround, requires a petroleum refinery employer to provide access onsite and allow Cal/OSHA to review documentation, as specified, for the process unit or plant scheduled to be shut down for that turnaround. (Lab. Code Sec. 7872.) Existing law defines "turnaround" to mean a planned, periodic shutdown, total or partial, of a refinery process unit or plant to perform maintenance, overhaul, and repair operations and to inspect, test, and replace process materials and equipment, but does not include unplanned shutdowns that occur due to emergencies or other unexpected maintenance matters in a process unit or plant, or routine maintenance, where routine maintenance consists of regular, periodic maintenance on one or more pieces of equipment at a refinery process unit or plant that may require shutdown of such equipment. (Lab. Code Sec. 7872(a).) Existing law requires a petroleum refinery employer to submit turnaround information to Cal/OSHA, regardless of whether the employer believes that information submitted may involve the release of a trade secret, as defined; however, at the time of submission, the employer may identify all or a portion of the SB 421 (Hancock) Page 4 of ? information submitted to Cal/OSHA as a trade secret and, to the extent feasible, segregate records designated as trade secret from the other records. (Lab. Code Sec. 7873(b)(1).) Existing law prohibits Cal/OSHA from releasing to the public any information designated as a trade secret by the petroleum refiner employer, subject to judicial review, as provided. (Lab. Code Sec. 7873(b)(2).) Existing law , upon the receipt of a request for the release of information to the public that includes information that the petroleum refinery employer has notified Cal/OSHA is a trade secret, as specified, requires Cal/OSHA to notify the petroleum refinery employer in writing of the request by certified mail, return receipt requested. (Lab. Code Sec. 7873(c)(1).) Existing law requires Cal/OSHA to release the requested information to the public, unless both of the following occur: within 30 days of receipt of the notice of the request for information, the petroleum refinery employer files an action in an appropriate court for a declaratory judgment that the information is subject to trade secret protection and promptly notifies Cal/OSHA of that action; and within 120 days of receipt of the notice of the request for information, the refinery petroleum employer obtains an order prohibiting disclosure of the information to the public and promptly notifies Cal/OSHA of that action. (Lab. Code Sec. 7873(c)(2).) Existing law prohibits release of any information that has been designated as a trade secret by a petroleum refinery employer, except that such information may be disclosed to other officers or employees of Cal/OSHA when relevant in any proceeding of Cal/OSHA. (Lab. Code Sec. 7873(d)(1).) Existing law provides that if the person requesting the release of the information or the petroleum refinery employer files an action to order or prohibit disclosure of trade secret information, the person instituting the proceeding is required to name the person or the petroleum refinery employer as a real party in interest. (Lab. Code Sec. 7873(d)(2).) Existing law also requires the petroleum refinery employer filing an action to challenge release of trade secret information to provide notice of the action to the person requesting the release of the information at the same time that SB 421 (Hancock) Page 5 of ? the defendant in the action is served. (Lab. Code Sec. 7873(d)(2)(A).) Existing law requires the person filing an action to compel the release of information that includes information that the petroleum refinery employer has notified Cal/OSHA is a trade secret to provide notice of the action to the petroleum refinery employer that submitted the information at the same time that the defendant in the action is served. (Lab. Code Sec. 7873(d)(2)(B).) Existing law requires the court to award costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the party that prevails in litigation, but prohibits the public agency from bearing the court costs for any party named in the litigation. (Lab. Code Sec. 7873(d)(3).) This bill would remove the requirement for a court to award costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the prevailing party. This bill would remove the requirement for either the person who has requested the release of information or the petroleum refinery employer who files an action to name the employer or person requesting the information as a real party in interest and, instead, provides that the employer or person requesting the information may intervene in an action filed by the person requesting the information or the employer. This bill would also make several technical and non-substantive revisions. COMMENT 1. Stated need for the bill The author writes: In 2014, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law [SB 1300 (Hancock, Chapter 519, Statutes of 2014)], Refinery Turnarounds. Specifically, [SB 1300] requires refinery employers in California to report to [the Division of Occupational Health and Safety (Cal/OSHA)] annually (by September 15 of the current year) a schedule of "turnaround" maintenance periods planned for the following calendar year. During a turnaround, a unit is brought offline for maintenance and repair work. SB 421 (Hancock) Page 6 of ? It is reported that refineries often have over a thousand workers (including refinery employees and contractors) performing multiple work activities simultaneously in limited spaces and on intensive work schedules, potentially creating unsafe conditions and work practices. Some of the most serious worker and process safety risks at refineries occur during turnarounds, particularly during the process of shutting down and restarting the unit. In addition to the calendar of scheduled turnarounds, [SB 1300] requires refineries to submit specific documents and reports detailing the current maintenance and structural issues of the refinery unit where a turnaround will be conducted. Refineries will also be required to flag any scheduled maintenance and repairs of equipment being deferred to a later turnaround period. Based on Cal/OSHA's experience, the rush to restart refinery units as soon as possible after a turnaround shutdown has at times caused necessary scheduled repair and maintenance work to be postponed or abandoned, allowing unsafe equipment to be restarted without repairs or replacement and resulting in worker injuries and deaths. As a result of the detailed reporting requirements of SB 1300, Cal/OSHA's inspectors will be able to review the refineries' plans for scheduled work and ask for clarification when scheduled work is postponed or dropped. . . . The ultimate goal of this increased oversight of turnarounds is to lower the number of accidents, explosions, and other unplanned events at refineries and to provide greater safety protection for refinery employees and their many contractors, as well as greater protection of community residents. 2. Eliminating attorney's fees for prevailing party Existing law authorizes either a person requesting turnaround information or the petroleum refinery employer to file an action to release or prohibit the release of information that the petroleum refinery employer has designated to be a trade secret. Existing law requires the court to award costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the prevailing party. This bill would strike the award of costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. SB 421 (Hancock) Page 7 of ? The author states that when SB 1300 was signed by Governor Brown, he required a commitment to introduce clean up legislation this year and to work with stakeholders to clarify the public disclosure process to ensure that petroleum refineries could not collect attorney's fees from individuals or organizations seeking turnaround records. (See Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr. letter to Members of the Cal. State Senate re Sen. Bill No. 1300 (2013-2014 Reg. Sess.) Sept. 20, 2014.) Accordingly, this bill seeks to remove the award of attorney's fees from the prevailing party. Notably, existing law, the California Public Records Act, provides the prevailing plaintiff the ability to receive an award of attorney's fees and costs, and those costs and fees are required to be paid by the public agency, as specified. (Gov. Code Sec. 6259(d).) This provision means that the person requesting disclosure of information from the public agency would receive attorney's fees and costs. The public policy behind this provision is so that the public is not discouraged from seeking judicial review of information claimed to be confidential or exempt from disclosure by the public agency, which furthers the purpose of transparency of government agencies. SB 1300, on the other hand, authorizes both the person seeking release of turnaround information and the petroleum refinery employer to file an action to release the information or maintain its confidentiality. In either case, the public agency (most likely Cal/OSHA, the entity to whom the employer is required to provide the turnaround information) is the defendant. Because the defendant public agency, for all intents and purposes, is the middleman holding the information, the public agency is not required to bear the court costs for any party named in the litigation. Accordingly, this bill would simply maintain that each party would be liable for its own attorneys' fees and costs. 3. Clarifying ability to intervene in disclosure action Existing law requires either the person seeking release of turnaround information or the petroleum refinery employer who has filed the court action to provide notice to the petroleum refinery employer or the person requesting the information. This bill would strike those provisions and, instead, authorize the petroleum refinery employer or the person requesting release of the information to intervene in the action. This means that, if the petroleum refinery employer files an action as the SB 421 (Hancock) Page 8 of ? plaintiff against the defendant public agency, the person seeking release of the information could intervene in that action to make a case for why disclosure of the information is in the best interests of the public. Conversely, if the person seeking release of the information files the action as the plaintiff against the defendant public agency, then the petroleum refinery employer would be authorized to intervene in that action to argue why maintaining the confidentiality of the information is more important than the public's need for transparency. Support : None Known Opposition : None Known HISTORY Source : Author Related Pending Legislation : None Known Prior Legislation : SB 1300 (Hancock, Chapter 519, Statutes of 2014) See Background; Comments 1 and 2. SB 438 (Hancock, 2013), among other things, upon the request of the Division of Occupational Safety and Health, would have required a refinery employer to provide specified documentation relating to a planned turnaround within a certain period of time. SB 438 was held on suspense in the Assembly Appropriations Committee. AB 3672 (Elder, Chapter 1632, Statutes of 1990) See Background. ************** SB 421 (Hancock) Page 9 of ?