BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 425|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                UNFINISHED BUSINESS 


          Bill No:  SB 425
          Author:   Hernandez (D), et al.
          Amended:  6/14/16  
          Vote:     21 

           PRIOR VOTES NOT RELEVANT

           SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE:  11-0, 8/24/16 (pursuant to  
            Senate Rule 29.10)
           AYES:  Beall, Cannella, Allen, Bates, Gaines, Galgiani, Leyva,  
            McGuire, Mendoza, Roth, Wieckowski

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  79-0, 8/18/16 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   City of El Monte:  maintenance of effort:  streets  
                     and roads allocations


          SOURCE:    City of El Monte


          


          DIGEST:  This bill extends the date for the City of El Monte to  
          meet its maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement for funds  
          received from the Transportation Investment Fund (TIF).

          Assembly Amendments delete the Senate version of the bill and  
          replace it with the current language.  

          ANALYSIS:

          Existing law:
          








                                                                     SB 425  
                                                                     Page 2



          1)Directs the transfer of revenue from sales tax collected on  
            motor vehicle fuel from the General Fund to the TIF; directs  
            the revenue to be apportioned, in part, to cities and counties  
            for rehabilitation and maintenance of local streets and roads.  
             

          2)Establishes an MOE requirement for cities and counties as a  
            condition of receiving TIF funds; specifically, in exchange  
            for receiving TIF allocations, cities and counties were  
            required to expend from their general fund for street, road,  
            and highway purposes an amount not less than the annual  
            average of their expenditures from their general fund during  
            the 1996-97, 1997-98, and 1998-99 fiscal years, as reported to  
            the State Controller's Office (SCO).  

          3)Provides that cities and counties had two fiscal years within  
            which to meet their MOE requirement; cities and counties that  
            failed to do so would have to return the TIF funds to the SCO  
            for redistribution to other cities and counties.

          4)Replaces partially, per ABX8 6 (Committee on Budget, Chapter  
            11, Statutes of 2009-10 Eighth Extraordinary Session) and SB  
            70 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, Chapter 9, Statutes  
            of 2010), the sales tax on motor vehicle fuels with an excise  
            tax and, as a result, rendered the TIF and related provisions  
            obsolete.

          This bill:

          1)Extends the date for City of El Monte to meet its MOE  
            requirement for funds received from the TIF to June 30, 2021.

          2)Makes legislative findings and declarations regarding the need  
            for a statutory extension for the City of El Monte.

          Comments

          1)Purpose.  The author notes, "Between 2006 and 2011, El Monte  
            received funding from the State's Traffic Congestion Relief  
            Fund (TCRF), and as per state law, was required to contribute  
            an MOE amount of approximately $2 million as a local match.  
            Unfortunately, El Monte, as was the case with every other city  








                                                                     SB 425  
                                                                     Page 3



            in California, underwent a recession during this time. It was  
            unable to contribute its MOE as a result. Since this was  
            revealed in an audit in 2014, El Monte has attempted to reach  
            an agreement with the state to repay its MOE, but was told  
            that repayment after the fact required a statutory change."

          2)SCO audit report.  As noted by the author, in October 2014,  
            the SCO released an audit on the City's use of state  
            transportation revenues. The SCO's audit found that in the  
            period from July 1, 2006, to June 30, 2011, the City did not  
            meet its MOE requirements in return for monies from the TCRF  
            for two of those years, totaling $2.05 million.  As a result  
            of this finding, the City would be required to return the  
            $2.05 million back to the SCO.  In response to the audit's  
            findings, the City requested that alternative arrangements be  
            established to meet the TCRF's MOE obligation; however, the  
            SCO informed the City that existing law does not provide the  
            flexibility for alternative arrangements and would require a  
            legislative remedy in order for the City to be provided some  
            relief.    

          3)What is MOE?  An MOE is a requirement in certain legislative,  
            regulatory or administrative policies that a recipient of  
            specific funds (e.g., state or federal transportation funds)  
            must maintain a specified level of financial effort in that  
            particular program area (e.g., funding for road  
            rehabilitation) in order for these specified funds to be  
            provided to the recipient.  MOE requirements are usually given  
            in terms of a previous base-year monetary amount and are  
            typically established to ensure a recipient of the funds is  
            committed to maintaining the same level of services it has  
            been providing prior to receiving the additional revenue. 

          4)Prior MOE relief to locals.  Over the past six years, the  
            Legislature has provided MOE extensions to several local  
            entities.  The County of Fresno also failed to meet its TIF  
            MOE obligations and was subsequently statutorily authorized to  
            fulfill that obligation by providing specialty medical  
            services in conjunction with federally funded clinics to  
            indigent individuals.  Additionally, the City of Santa Rosa  
            sought statutory relief, similar to this bill, to grant it  
            more time to apply funds equal to its MOE requirements on  








                                                                     SB 425  
                                                                     Page 4



            local streets and roads.
          
          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No


          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, absent this  
          bill, the City would have to provide a $2 million reimbursement  
          to the state, which would be reallocated among cities and  
          counties for streets and roads. This bill requires the City to  
          instead spend this amount from its general fund, by June 30,  
          2021, to maintain its own streets and roads.




          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/24/16)


          City of El Monte (source)


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/24/16)




          None received 



          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  79-0, 8/18/16
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker,  
            Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke,  
            Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley,  
            Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth  
            Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto,  
            Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper,  
            Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine,  
            Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty,  
            Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell,  
            Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas,  








                                                                     SB 425  
                                                                     Page 5



            Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner,  
            Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Roger Hernández


          Prepared by:Manny Leon / T. & H. / (916) 651-4121
          8/25/16 18:00:21


                                   ****  END  ****