Amended in Senate April 6, 2015

Senate BillNo. 454


Introduced by Senator Allen

February 25, 2015


An act tobegin delete amend Section 13399 of the Waterend deletebegin insert add Section 3113 to the Public Resourcesend insert Code, relating to water quality.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 454, as amended, Allen. Water quality:begin delete minor violations.end deletebegin insert oil and gas: exempt aquifer.end insert

begin insert

Existing federal law prohibits certain oil and gas well activities that affect underground sources of drinking water unless those sources are located in an exempt aquifer. Existing federal law authorizes a state delegated with the responsibility of regulating certain wells to propose that an aquifer or a portion of an aquifer be an exempt aquifer and authorizes the United States Environmental Protection Agency to approve the proposal if the aquifer or a portion of the aquifer meets certain criteria. Under existing federal law, the authority to regulate those wells in California is delegated to the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources in the Department of Conservation.

end insert
begin insert

This bill would prohibit the division from submitting a proposal for an aquifer exemption to the United States Environmental Protection Agency unless the division and the State Water Resources Control Board concur in writing that the aquifer meets specified conditions.

end insert
begin delete

The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board and the California regional water quality control boards to conduct inspections for violations of specified law. The act requires the state board and the regional boards to determine the types of violations that are minor violations and requires the state board to adopt regulations or state policy for water quality, as prescribed.

end delete
begin delete

This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to the provision relating to minor violations.

end delete

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1begin insert

begin insertSECTION 1.end insert  

end insert

begin insertSection 3113 is added to the end insertbegin insertPublic Resources
2Code
end insert
begin insert, to read:end insert

begin insert
3

begin insert3113.end insert  

The division shall not submit a proposal for an aquifer
4exemption to the United States Environmental Protection Agency
5under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 300f et
6seq.) and regulations implementing that act unless the division
7and the State Water Resources Control Board concur in writing
8that the aquifer meets either of the following conditions:

9(a) The division determines that the aquifer is hydrocarbon
10bearing, as described in Section 146.4(b)(1) of Title 40 of the Code
11of Federal Regulations, and either of the following additional
12determinations is made:

13(1) The division and the State Water Resources Control Board
14determine that the intended injection zone is geologically and
15 hydrogeologically isolated from any zone containing waters that
16may have a beneficial use.

17(2) The State Water Resources Control Board determines that
18the intended injection zone contains waters with potential beneficial
19uses and the fluids to be injected into the zone will not impact those
20beneficial uses.

21(b) The division determines that the aquifer is nonhydrocarbon
22bearing and the aquifer meets all of the following conditions:

23(1) The aquifer meets the criteria in Section 146.4(a) to (c),
24inclusive, of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

25(2) The total dissolved solids content of the water in the aquifer
26is greater than 3,000 milligrams per liter.

27(3) The division and the State Water Resources Control Board
28determine that the intended injection zone is geologically and
29hydrogeologically isolated from any zone containing waters that
30may have a beneficial use.

P3    1(4) The State Water Resources Control Board determines in
2writing to the division and posts on the board’s Internet Web site
3in a public and readily accessible location that the injection of
4fluids into the aquifer would not contaminate a source of water
5that currently has, or could in the future have, a beneficial use,
6subject to the following:

7(A) For an aquifer situated at a depth or location that makes
8recovery of the water currently technologically impractical or an
9aquifer that is so contaminated that it would be economically or
10technologically impractical to render that water fit for human
11consumption or other beneficial use, the board shall consider and
12make a written determination regarding the potential for future
13technology to make the aquifer viable as a water source.

14(B) The board shall consider and make a written determination
15regarding the state’s need to identify and develop new sources of
16water and how that need might affect the viability of a currently
17contaminated aquifer.

18(5) If the aquifer contains water that is currently or potentially
19limited in its beneficial use due to existing contamination, the State
20Water Resources Control Board determines that the injection of
21fluids into the aquifer would not impair the limited current or
22potential beneficial use of the waters.

end insert
begin delete
23

SECTION 1.  

Section 13399 of the Water Code is amended to
24read:

25

13399.  

(a) The Legislature hereby finds and declares that the
26purpose of this chapter is to establish an enforcement policy for
27violations of this division that the enforcement agency finds are
28minor when the danger they pose to, or the potential that they have
29for endangering, human health, safety, or welfare or the
30environment are taken into account.

31(b) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this chapter to
32provide a more resource-efficient enforcement mechanism, faster
33compliance times, and the creation of a productive and cooperative
34working relationship between the state board, the regional boards,
35and the regulated community while maintaining protection of
36human health and safety and the environment.

37(c) This chapter applies solely to the actions of the state board
38and the regional boards in administering this division and has no
39application to the administrative enforcement actions of other
40public agencies.

P4    1(d) The state board and each regional board shall implement
2this chapter by determining the types of violations of this division,
3or of the regulations, rules, standards, orders, permit conditions,
4or other requirements adopted pursuant to this division that the
5state board or the regional board finds are minor violations in
6accordance with subdivisions (e) and (f). The state board shall
7implement this chapter through adoption of regulations or state
8policy for water quality control pursuant to Article 3 (commencing
9with Section 13140) of Chapter 3.

10(e) In determining the types of violations that are minor
11 violations, the state board or regional board shall consider all of
12the following factors:

13(1) The magnitude of the violation.

14(2) The scope of the violation.

15(3) The severity of the violation.

16(4) The degree to which a violation puts human health, safety,
17or welfare or the environment into jeopardy.

18(5) The degree to which a violation could contribute to the
19failure to accomplish an important goal or program objective as
20established by this division.

21(6) The degree to which a violation may make it difficult to
22determine if the violator is in compliance with other requirements
23of this division.

24(f) For purposes of this chapter, a minor violation of this division
25shall not include any of the following:

26(1) A knowing, willful, or intentional violation of this division.

27(2) A violation of this division that enables the violator to benefit
28economically from noncompliance, either by realizing reduced
29costs or by gaining a competitive advantage.

30(3) A violation that is a chronic violation or that is committed
31by a recalcitrant violator.

32(g) In determining whether a violation is chronic or a violator
33is recalcitrant, for purposes of paragraph (3) of subdivision (f), the
34state board or regional board shall consider whether there is
35evidence indicating that the violator has engaged in a pattern of
36neglect or disregard with respect to the requirements of this division
37or the requirements adopted pursuant to this division.

end delete


O

    98