SB 463, as amended, Hancock. School climate: Safe and Supportive Schools Train the Trainer Program.
Existing law establishes a system of public elementary and secondary schools in this state, and authorizes local educational agencies throughout the state to provide instruction to pupils.
This bill would establish the Safe and Supportive Schools Train the Trainer Program. The bill, to the extent that one-time funding is made available in the Budget Act of 2015, would require the State Department of Education to apportion funds to a designated county office of education, selected from applicant county offices of education, that would be the fiduciary agent for the program. The bill would require the designated county office of education to consult with specified organizations and to be in charge of establishing specific professional development activities that will lead to statewide professional development support structures and a network of trainers allowing for the development and expansion of the Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports programs, restorative justice, social and emotional learning, trauma-informed practice, and cultural competency professional development in each region of the state, as provided.
The bill would require the Legislative Analyst’s Office to review the impacts of this professional development effort and report to the Governor and the Legislature on or before June 30, 2019, on specified aspects of this training. The bill would require that any funding allocated for this program be expended on or before January 1, 2019.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) California schools issued more thanbegin delete 600,000end deletebegin insert 500,000end insert
4 suspensions in thebegin delete 2012-13end deletebegin insert 2013-14end insert school year.begin delete Recent statistics
5indicate that 20 percent of schoolage youth experience a functional
6or significant behavior or mental health disorder. Studies estimate
7that between 3.3 million and 10 million children in the United
8States witness violence in their own homes each year. Children
9who have experienced early, chronic trauma, such as family or
10community violence, can develop emotional, behavioral, cognitive,
11and relationship difficulties that can adversely affect their ability
12to learn and function well in school.
Exposure to trauma is
13associated with a higher risk for school dropout, and in turn,
14dropping out of school increases the risk of being imprisoned.
15Behavioral problems among schoolage youth are associated with
16high rates of depression, experiencing a traumatic or violent event,
17and other significant homelife stresses. Unfortunately,end delete
18California, pupils of color are disproportionately subjected to
19out-of-school suspensions. African American pupils are three times
20more likely to be suspended than all other groups. Native
21Americans have the second highest suspension rate in the state.
22Studies have also shown that pupils of color are disciplined more
23harshly than other pupilsend insertbegin insert, resulting in serious, negative educational
24consequences. Exclusionary
school removals cause a number of
25correlated negative educational, economic, and social problems,
26including school avoidance, increased likelihood of dropping out,
27and involvement with the juvenile justice system. This civil rights
28in education crisis has come to be known as the school-to-prison
29pipeline.end insert
P3 1begin insert(b)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insert Unfortunately,end insert too many youth, particularly pupils of color
2and other vulnerable groups of pupils, such as foster youth, who
3have been subjected to significant trauma are suspended from
4school each year.begin delete For pupils with these mental health concerns, begin insert
Theend insert American Academy of Pediatrics has found that suspension
5theend delete
6can increase stress and may predispose pupils to antisocial behavior
7and even suicidal ideation. Psychologists have similarly found that
8disciplinary exclusion policies can increase pupil shame, alienation,
9rejection, and breaking of healthy adult bonds, thereby exacerbating
10negative mental health outcomes for young people. Removing
11pupils from school through disciplinary exclusion also increases
12the risk that they will become victims of violent crime.
13(b)
end delete
14begin insert(c)end insert The local control funding formula
identifies school climate
15as a state priority. However, there are a number of school districts
16in hard-to-serve locations in the state that do not have access to,
17and are not served by, professionals who have training in
18research-based, schoolwide strategies that can address pupil social,
19emotional, and mental health learning needs. The demand for
20trainers and training in these practices in California has exceeded
21the supply.
22(c)
end delete
23begin insert(d)end insert Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports
24(SW-PBIS) programs, restorative justice, social and emotional
25learning and trauma-informed practices
have been shown to address
26these needs while also significantly reducing suspension and
27expulsion rates.
28(d)
end delete
29begin insert(e)end insert SW-PBIS can provide a comprehensive and collaborative
30prevention and intervention framework for schools to improve
31academic and behavioral outcomes for all pupils. Recent research
32from Orange County has shown that in school districts where
33SW-PBIS has been implemented there has been a 26-percent drop
34in in-school suspensions, a 55-percent drop in out-of-school
35suspensions, and a 30-percent drop in expulsions. Schools that
36have established and maintained SW-PBIS systems with
integrity
37have teaching and learning environments that are less reactive,
38aversive, punitive, dangerous, and exclusionary, are more engaging,
39responsive, preventive, productive, and participatory, address
40classroom management and disciplinary issues such as attendance,
P4 1cooperation, participation, and meeting positive expectations,
2improve support for pupils whose behavior requires more
3specialized or intensive assistance for emotional and behavioral
4disorders and mental health issues, and maximize academic
5engagement and achievement for all pupils.
6(e)
end delete
7begin insert(f)end insert Restorative justice or restorative
practices are a set of
8principles and practices grounded in the values of showing respect,
9taking responsibility, and strengthening relationships.begin insert Restorative
10justice is a healing practice that both prevents and responds to
11harmful behaviors.end insert When harm occurs at a schoolsite, restorative
12justice focuses on repair of harm and prevention of reoccurrence.
13Restorative practice, which builds upon restorative justice and
14applies in the school context, is used to build a sense of school
15community and resolve conflict by repairing harm and restoring
16positive relationships through the use of regular restorative circles
17where pupils and educators work together to set academic goals,
18develop core values for the classroom community, and resolve
19conflicts. Practices such as peacemaking circles and restorative
20conferences are
designed to help pupils take responsibility for their
21actions and repair the harm they may have caused. Through this
22process, pupils learn how to interact and manage their relationships.
23A restorative justice approach enables school personnel to intervene
24more effectively, increasing support without compromising
25accountability.begin delete At Richmond High School in West Contra Costa begin insert A recent study regarding
26Unified School District, a 2011 restorative school discipline
27program cut the school’s nearly 500 suspensions by January 2011
28by one-half by January 2012.end delete
29implementation of restorative justice in the Oakland Unified School
30District (OUSD) from 2011-2014 found that, among other things:
31(1) the discipline gap between white and African American pupils
32
decreased significantly for OUSD pupils who participated in
33restorative justice programs, but stayed the same for pupils who
34did not participate in these programs, (2) there was a 128-percent
35increase in the reading levels of 9th graders at OUSD schools with
36restorative justice programs, compared to an 11-percent increase
37in schools without such programs, and (3) four-year graduation
38rates increased by 60 percent at OUSD’s restorative justice schools
39in the past three years, compared to 7 percent for other schools.end insert
40(f)
end delete
P5 1begin insert(g)end insert Trauma-informed practices are strategies and professional
2development for school staff integrated into a
multitier intervention
3and prevention framework to help increase school staff’s
4understanding regarding the impact that trauma has on pupil
5behavior and provide tools to address such behavior in a manner
6that does not retraumatize the pupil, and to develop a multilevel
7school-based prevention and intervention program for pupils with
8the highest trauma needs. At El Dorado Elementary School, where
9UCSF HEARTS -- Healthy Environments and Response to
10Trauma in Schools, a trauma-informed practices model, has been
11in operation for four years and where the school consistently
12
tracked office discipline referral data, staff reported a 32-percent
13decrease in such referrals and a 42-percent decrease in violent
14pupil incidents after the first year.
15(g)
end delete
16begin insert(h)end insert Social and emotional learning (SEL), which is a process that
17occurs through teaching in the classroom and reinforcement
18throughout the schoolday to help pupils acquire and effectively
19apply the knowledge, attitudes, and skills necessary to recognize
20and manage emotions, develop caring and concern for others, make
21responsible decisions, establish positive relationships, and handle
22challenging situations capably,
has shown similar success. A
23meta-analysis of 213 rigorous studies of SEL found that the
24academic achievement scores of pupils receiving quality SEL
25instruction were an average of 11 percentile points higher than
26pupils who did not receive SEL instruction. In 2007-2008 in the
27Los Angeles Unified School District, 58 percent of the model SEL
28schools showed 43 percent fewer discipline referrals, a 45-percent
29reduction in physically aggressive behavior, a 64-percent reduction
30in disruptive behavior, and at least 30 points of growth in academic
31performance. An in-depth study found that pupils who received
32SEL instruction had more positive attitudes about school and
33improved an average of 11 percentile points on standardized
34achievement tests compared to pupils who did not receive that
35instruction. Secondary benefits of SEL include improved
36graduation rates, reduced violence, and lowered substance
abuse.
37SEL is a tier one universal SW-PBIS strategy for all pupils.
38(h)
end delete
39begin insert(i)end insert In order to ensure that all pupils flourish academically, school
40districts must establish equitable discipline practices and behavioral
P6 1interventions that promote positive social-emotional development
2and that prevent and respond to negative behaviors in order to
3reengage disconnected pupils. School psychologists, social
4workers, and mental health counselors play a critical role in
5implementing school-based educationally related counseling
6services and positive behavior systems and supports that create
7and reinforce
positive school cultures of achievement for all pupils,
8including those at risk of academic failure.
9(i)
end delete
10begin insert(j)end insert The local control funding formula has been passed in an
11effort to reform school finance and to direct funding directly to
12at-risk pupil populations as outlined in Section 42238.07 of the
13Education Code. This section states that the regulations shall
14require a school district “to increase or improve services for
15unduplicated pupils.” Research shows that efforts to improve
16school climate, safety, and learning are not separate endeavors.
17They must be designed, funded, and implemented as a
18comprehensive
schoolwide approach. School districts must work
19to ensure through their local control and accountability plans that
20pupils have access to universal, targeted, and individualized
21psychological, behavioral, and counseling services and support
22that will increase their chances for academic improvement.
23(j)
end delete
24begin insert(k)end insert SW-PBIS, restorative justice, trauma-informed practices,
25and SEL can support the local control and accountability plan
26priority areas of school climate and pupil engagement by providing
27local schools and school districts in hard-to-serve areas with the
28research-based framework and strategies to
produce targeted pupil
29behavioral and academic outcomes.
30(k)
end delete
31begin insert(l)end insert Restorative practices, trauma-informed practices, and social
32and emotional learning can be incorporated into the tiered
33framework of SW-PBIS to help pupils gain critical social and
34emotional skills, receive support to help transform trauma-related
35responses, and create places where pupils can understand the
36impact of their actions and develop meaningful consequences for
37repairing harm to the school community.
Chapter 18.5 (commencing with Section 53320) is
39added to Part 28 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Education Code,
40to read:
(a) To the extent that one-time funding is made
5available in the Budget Act of 2015, the department shall apportion
6funds to a designated county office of education to be the fiduciary
7agent for the Safe and Supportive Schools Train the Trainer
8Program. The designated county office of education shall be chosen
9by the Superintendent from county offices that apply for
10designation under this chapter. The designated county office of
11education shall be in charge of establishing specific professional
12development activities that will lead to statewide professional
13development support structures and a network of trainers allowing
14for the development and expansion of the Schoolwide Positive
15Behavior Interventions and Supports (SW-PBIS)
programs,
16restorative justice, social and emotional learning (SEL),
17
trauma-informed practice, and cultural competency professional
18development in each region of the state, with a specific focus on
19those regions that are underserved and do not have access to
20trainers in these research-based approaches.
21(b) The designated county office of education shall consult with
22the Regional K-12 Student Mental Health Initiative, the National
23Alliance on Mental Illness, the California Technical Assistance
24Center on SW-PBIS,begin insert the California Association of School
25Psychologists,end insert the California County Superintendents Educational
26Services Association, the California Mental Health Directors
27Association, Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional
28Learning (CASEL), UCSF Healthy Environments and Response
29to Trauma
in Schools (HEARTS) project, Restorative Justice for
30Oakland Youth,begin insert the Restorative Schools Vision Project,end insert the
31International Institute for Restorative Practices, and other nonprofit
32and public agencies to effectively implement these strategies
33throughout the state and nationally. The designated county office
34of education shall also select an advisory committee made up of
35stakeholders and professionals who have participated in the
36development and expansion of these programs to assist in the
37planning and implementation of this program.
38(c) Within the context of a state-level plan, funding shall be
39targeted to all of the following critical activities:
P8 1(1) Explaining the importance of
linking research-based
2strategies with local control funding formula planning and local
3control and accountability plans, specifically with respect to the
4school climate and pupil engagement state priority areas.
5(2) Creating regional conferences and workshops on
6implementation that would provide free training for school and
7school district teams.
8(3) Establishing stipends for release time for school personnel
9attending these conferences.
10(4) Developing best practices of current district level systems
11and ensuring that these best practices are widely disseminated.
12(5) Establishing a cohort of free or low-cost trainers and coaches
13who can be available to work
directly with local school districts
14in hard-to-serve areas that are seeking to implement research-based
15strategies.
16(6) Developing a network of educators who are effectively
17implementing these practices and willing to provide coaching and
18training to other schools and school districts, particularly in
19hard-to-serve areas.
20(7) Developing statewide methods for collecting and
21disseminating best practices in implementing research-based
22strategies.
23(8) Developing evaluation tools to measure the effectiveness of
24research-based strategies.
25(9) Developing specific professional development and
26professional learning communities for teachers utilizing these
27practices
in their classes.
28(d) The Legislative Analyst’s Office shall review the impacts
29of this professional development effort and shall report to the
30Governor and the Legislature on or before June 30, 2019, on the
31breadth and best practices of the training and any pupil outcomes
32impacted by this training effort.
33(e) Any funding allocated for this program shall be expended
34on or before January 1, 2019.
O
98