BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 482


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          482 (Lara)


          As Amended  August 1, 2016


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  28-11


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Business &      |16-0 |Salas, Brough, Baker, |                    |
          |Professions     |     |Bloom, Campos,        |                    |
          |                |     |Chávez, Dahle, Dodd,  |                    |
          |                |     |Eggman, Gatto, Gomez, |                    |
          |                |     |Holden, Jones,        |                    |
          |                |     |Mullin, Ting, Wood    |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Holden,       |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Obernolte,     |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood,  |                    |








                                                                     SB 482


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Chau                  |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  This bill requires a health care practitioner, as  
          specified, authorized to prescribe, order, administer, or  
          furnish a controlled substance to consult the Controlled  
          Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES)  
          database before prescribing certain controlled substances, as  
          specified.  Specifically, this bill:


          1)Authorizes a health care practitioner to provide a patient  
            with a copy of the patient's CURES patient activity report and  
            keep a copy of the report in the patient's medical record if  
            reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the report is  
            provided or kept, as specified.
          2)Requires a health care practitioner authorized to prescribe,  
            order, administer, or furnish a controlled substance to  
            consult the CURES database to review a patient's controlled  
            substance history before prescribing a Schedule II, Schedule  
            III, or Schedule IV controlled substance to the patient for  
            the first time and at least four months thereafter if the  
            substance remains part of the treatment of the patient.


          3)Defines "first time" to mean the initial occurrence in which a  
            health care practitioner, in his or her role as a health care  
            practitioner, intends to prescribe, order, administer, or  
            furnish a Schedule II, Schedule III, or Schedule IV controlled  
            substance to a patient and has not previously prescribed a  
            controlled substance to the patient.


          4)Requires a health care practitioner to obtain a patient's  
            controlled substance history from the CURES database no  
            earlier than 24 hours, or the previous business day, before he  








                                                                     SB 482


                                                                    Page  3





            or she prescribes, orders, administers, or furnishes a  
            Schedule II, Schedule III, or Schedule IV controlled substance  
            to the patient.


          5)Exempts veterinarians from the duty to consult the CURES  
            database. 


          6)Exempts health care practitioners from the duty to consult the  
            CURES database in any of the following circumstances:


             a)   If a health care practitioner prescribes, orders, or  
               furnishes a controlled substance to be administered to a  
               patient while the patient is admitted to any of the  
               following facilities or during an emergency transfer  
               between any of the following facilities for use while on  
               facility premises:
               i)     A clinic licensed under the Department of Public  
                 Health (DPH).
               ii)An outpatient setting.


               iii)A health facility, including acute care hospitals and  
                 skilled nursing facilities.


               iv)A county medical facility.


             b)   If a health care practitioner prescribes, orders,  
               administers, or furnishes a controlled substance in the  
               emergency department of a general acute care hospital and  
               the quantity of the controlled substance does not exceed a  
               nonrefillable seven-day supply of the controlled substance  
               to be used in accordance with the directions for use.
             c)   If a health care practitioner prescribes, orders,  
               administers, or furnishes a controlled substance to a  








                                                                     SB 482


                                                                    Page  4





               patient currently receiving hospice care.


             d)   If a health care practitioner prescribes, orders,  
               administers, or furnishes a controlled substance to a  
               patient as part of the patient's treatment for a surgical  
               procedure and the quantity of the controlled substance does  
               not exceed a nonrefillable five-day supply of the  
               controlled substance to be used in accordance with the  
               directions for use, use in any of the following facilities:


               i)     A clinic licensed under the Department of Public  
                 Health (DPH).
               ii)An outpatient setting.


               iii)A health facility, including acute care hospitals and  
                 skilled nursing facilities.


               iv)A county medical facility.


               v)      A dental place of practice.


             e)   Any time all of the following specified circumstances  
               are satisfied and requires a health care practitioner who  
               does not consult the CURES database under the circumstances  
               to document the reason he or she did not consult the  
               database in the patient's medical record.  The required  
               circumstances are as follows:
               i)     It is not reasonably possible for a health care  
                 practitioner to access the information in the CURES  
                 database in a timely manner.
               ii)Another health care practitioner or designee authorized  
                 to access the CURES database is not reasonably available.









                                                                     SB 482


                                                                    Page  5






               iii)The quantity of controlled substance prescribed,  
                 ordered, administered, or furnished does not exceed a  
                 nonrefillable five-day supply of the controlled substance  
                 to be used in accordance with the directions for use and  
                 no refill of the controlled substance is allowed.


             f)   If the CURES database is not operational, as determined  
               by the Department of Justice (DOJ), or when it cannot be  
               accessed by a health care practitioner because of a  
               temporary technological or electrical failure.  Requires a  
               health care practitioner to, without undue delay, seek to  
               correct any cause of the temporary technological or  
               electrical failure that is reasonably within his or her  
               control. 
             g)   If the CURES database cannot be accessed because of  
               technological limitations that are not reasonably within  
               the control of a health care practitioner.


             h)   If the CURES database cannot be accessed because of  
               exceptional circumstances, as demonstrated by a health care  
               practitioner.


          7)Requires that a health care practitioner who knowingly fails  
            to consult the CURES database, be referred to the appropriate  
            state professional licensing board solely for administrative  
            sanctions, as deemed appropriate by that board.
          8)Provides that the requirement to consult the CURES database  
            does not create a private cause of action against a health  
            care practitioner.  


          9)Provides that the requirement does not limit a health care  
            practitioner's liability for the negligent failure to diagnose  
            or treat a patient.









                                                                     SB 482


                                                                    Page  6






          10)Provides that the requirement is not operative until six  
            months after the DOJ certifies that the CURES database is  
            ready for statewide use.  Requires the DOJ to notify the  
            Secretary of State and the office of the Legislative Counsel  
            of the date of the certification.


          11)States that all applicable state and federal privacy laws  
            govern the duties required by this bill.


          12)States that the provisions of this bill, once they become  
            law, are severable.  States that if any provision or its  
            application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect  
            other provisions or applications that can be given effect  
            without the invalid provision or application.


          13)Provides that, if a health care practitioner authorized to  
            prescribe, order, administer, or furnish a controlled  
            substance is not required to consult the CURES database the  
            first time he or she prescribes, orders, administers, or  
            furnishes a controlled substance to a patient pursuant to one  
            of those exemptions, the health care practitioner shall  
            consult the CURES database before subsequently prescribing a  
            Schedule II, Schedule III, or Schedule IV controlled substance  
            to the patient and at least once every four months thereafter  
            if the substance remains part of the treatment of the patient.


          FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1)Boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs that license  
            health professionals will incur likely minor and absorbable  
            costs to notify licensees and enforce the bill's requirements,  
            as well as make any necessary information technology changes  








                                                                     SB 482


                                                                    Page  7





            (various fee-supported special funds).  The 2016-17 budget  
            provides $500,000 from the CURES Fund for additional user  
            outreach and staffing support.


          2)No anticipated costs to the Department of Justice, who  
            administers CURES.  An upgrade to the CURES system was  
            completed last year to address shortcomings in usability and  
            reliability.  The DOJ indicates the upgraded system is  
            designed to accommodate high usage by prescribers and will be  
            able to accommodate the projected demand if this bill is  
            enacted.


          COMMENTS:


          Purpose.  This bill is co-sponsored by the Consumer Attorneys of  
          California and the California Narcotics Officers' Association.   
          According to the author, "According to the Centers for Disease  
          Control and Prevention, drug overdoses are the top cause of  
          accidental death in the United States.  Nearly 23,000 people  
          died from an overdose of pharmaceuticals in 2013 nationally -  
          more than 70% of them from opiate prescription painkillers.  The  
          CURES database is an invaluable investigative, preventative, and  
          educational tool for law enforcement and the healthcare  
          community.  The current voluntary approach has not been able to  
          attract sufficient participation to make it truly effective.  SB  
          482 requires all prescribers to consult the CURES system before  
          issuing Schedule II, III, and IV drugs.  This will enable  
          prescribers to make informed decisions about their patient's  
          care and limit the number of people who doctor shop and over use  
          prescription drugs." 


          Background.  According to the United States Drug Enforcement  
          Agency, drugs, substances, and certain chemicals used to make  
          drugs are classified into five distinct categories or schedules  
          depending upon the drug's acceptable medical use and the drug's  








                                                                     SB 482


                                                                    Page  8





          abuse or dependency potential.  Schedule I drugs have the  
          highest potential for abuse while Schedule V is the lowest.  




          Prescription Drug Overdose Deaths.  According to the Centers for  
          Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), drug overdoses are the top  
          cause of accidental deaths in the United States.  Overdose  
          deaths involving prescription opioids have quadrupled since  
          1999, as well as sales of these prescription drugs.   
          Additionally, approximately 20% of prescribers prescribe 80% of  
          all prescription painkillers.  


          In the years spanning 1999 to 2014, over 165,000 people died in  
          the United States from overdoses related to prescription  
          opioids.  During this time period, overdose rates were highest  
          among people age 25 to 54 years.  Overdose rates were higher  
          among non-Hispanic whites and American Indian or Alaskan  
          Natives, compared to non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics.  In  
          addition, men were more likely to die from overdose, but the  
          mortality gap between men and women is closing. 


          CURES.  In 1996, California enacted the first prescription  
          monitoring drug program in the United States.  According to the  
          California Department of Justice, CURES is a database of  
          Schedule II, III, and IV controlled substance prescriptions  
          dispensed in California serving the public health, regulatory  
          oversight agencies, and law enforcement.  Access to CURES is  
          limited to licensed prescribers and licensed pharmacists  
          strictly for patients in their direct care; and regulatory board  
          staff and law enforcement personnel for official oversight or  
          investigatory purposes.  


          CURES receives about one million prescription records per week.   
          The database contains approximately 400 million entries of  








                                                                     SB 482


                                                                    Page  9





          controlled substance prescriptions dispensed in California.  The  
          system retains seven years of prescription data that is  
          de-identified. 


          As of February 5, 2016, there were 74, 258 registrants of the  
          CURES system.  All California licensed prescribers authorized to  
          prescribe scheduled drugs are required to register for access to  
          CURES version 2.0 by July 1, 2016, or upon issuance of a Drug  
          Enforcement Administration Controlled Substance Registration  
          Certificate, whichever occurs later.  Licensed pharmacists must  
          register for access to CURES 2.0 by July 1, 2016, or upon  
          issuance of a Board of Pharmacy Pharmacist License, whichever  
          occurs later (Health and Safety Code Section 11165.1).  Use of  
          CURES by prescribers and dispensers for prescription abuse  
          prevention or intervention is voluntary.


          Other States.  Forty-nine states currently have prescription  
          drug monitoring programs.  Approximately 24 states have mandates  
          for prescribers to check a state based prescription drug  
          monitoring system (National Alliance for Model State Drug Laws,  
          Reporting Requirements and Exemptions to Reporting, 2014).  


          Significantly improved public health outcomes have been seen in  
          states that have required prescribers to check their drug  
          monitoring systems.  According to information obtained from the  
          CDC, in 2012, Tennessee required prescribers to check the  
          state's prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) before  
          prescribing painkillers.  Within one year, there was a 36%  
          decline in patients who were seeing multiple prescribers to  
          obtain the same drugs.  In Virginia, the number of doctor  
          shoppers fell by 73% after use of the database became mandatory.  
           In Oklahoma, which requires mandatory checks for methadone,  
          overdose rates dropped approximately 21% in a single year. 


          There are current efforts to link PDMP systems nationwide.  The  








                                                                     SB 482


                                                                    Page  10





          National Association of Boards of Pharmacies (NABP) InterConnect  
          system permits authorized PDMP users in participating states to  
          access interstate data by logging directly into the state PDMP  
          in which they are a registered user.  Currently, 33 states,  
          excluding California, have PDMPs that are linked to the NABP  
          InterConnect system.


          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Le Ondra Clark Harvey Ph.D. / B. & P. / (916)  
                          319-3301                                 FN:  
          0003857