BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS Senator Jim Nielsen, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: SB 506 Hearing Date: 4/28/15 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Fuller | |-----------+-----------------------------------------------------| |Version: |4/14/15 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant:|Wade Teasdale | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Economic development: military and aerospace DESCRIPTION *This measure was scheduled to be heard on Monday, April 27, 2015 in the Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development. Summary: 1. Establishes a process for the designation of a local retention authority to serve as the lead local government entity responsible for efforts to retain local military installations. 2. Creates the Military and Aerospace (MA) Program under the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) to address concerns relating to state and local defense retention, base conversion and base reuse activities. 3. Establishes the Space Enterprise Development Program within GO-Biz to foster activities that increase the competitiveness of space enterprise in California, including the commercial use of space, space vehicle launches, space launch infrastructure, manufacturing, applied research, technology development, economic diversification, and business development. Existing law: SB 506 (Fuller) Page 2 of ? Provisions Related to Military Base Retention, Conversion and Reuse 1. Establishes the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) in the Governor's office and tasks OPR with the formulation, evaluation and updating of long-age goals and policies for land use, population growth and distribution. 2. Requires OPR to develop and adopt guidelines for the preparation and content of the mandatory elements required in city and county general plans that, among other requirements: a. Contain advice including recommendations for best practices to allow for collaborative land use planning of adjacent civilian and military lands and facilities. b. Encourage enhanced land use compatibility between civilian lands and any adjacent or nearby military facilities through the examination of potential impacts upon one another. c. Contain advice for addressing the effects of civilian development on military readiness activities carried out on military installations, operating areas, training areas, training routes, airspace and other territory adjacent to those installations and areas. 3. Requires OPR to prepare and publish an advisory planning handbook for use by local officials, planners, and builders that explains how to reduce land use conflicts between the effects of civilian development and military readiness activities carried out on military installations, operating areas, training areas, training routes, and airspace, and other territory adjacent to those installations and areas. 4. Requires OPR to serve as the state's liaison to the United States Department of Defense (DoD) in order to facilitate coordination on issues of mutual significant interest, particularly with regard to any proposed federal Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) actions. SB 506 (Fuller) Page 3 of ? a. Provides that OPR shall: i. Coordinate with DoD, other state agencies and departments, local governments, and other private and public entities to ensure the sustainability of defense activities within the state. ii. Develop legislation that supports the relationship between the state and DoD; iii. Work with federal defense agencies to address regulatory activities by state agencies that affect the sustainability of defense operations within the state and; iv. Develop any regional or statewide strategies necessary for the establishment and retention of the state's military facilities and installations that are potentially impacted by any proposed federal BRAC actions. 5. Establishes the Military Base Reuse Authority Act to plan for, finance and manage the transition of military bases from military to civilian use. 6. Establishes GO-Biz within the Governor's Office and authorizes it to: a. Serve as lead entity for economic strategy and the marketing of California on issues relating to business development, private sector investment and economic growth. b. Coordinate development of policies and criteria to ensure that federal grants administered or directly expended by state government advance statewide economic goals and objectives. c. Market the business and investment opportunities available in California by working in SB 506 (Fuller) Page 4 of ? partnership with local, regional, federal, and other state public and private institutions to encourage business development and investment in the state. d. Support small businesses by providing information about accessing capital, complying with regulations, and supporting state initiatives that support small business. 7. Requires GO-Biz to designate Innovation Hubs (iHubs) within the state to stimulate partnerships, economic development, and job creation by leveraging assets to provide an innovation platform for startup businesses, economic development organizations, business groups, and venture capitalists. 8. Requires an iHub to: (a) provide counseling and technical assistance in the areas of entrepreneurial business planning and management, financing, and marketing for small businesses; (b) provide expert advice to entrepreneurs on starting a business, including legal requirements for starting a business and access to financing opportunities; (c) conduct business workshops, seminars, and conferences with local partners; and (d) facilitate partnerships between innovative startup businesses, research institutions, and venture capitalists or financial institutions. 9. Creates the Innovation Accelerator Account within the California Economic Development Fund in the State Treasury and states that, subject to the approval of the Department of Finance, all moneys collected and received by GO-Biz for California Innovation Initiatives from gifts, bequests, or donations shall be deposited in the Innovation Accelerator Account and continuously appropriated to GO-Biz pursuant to requirements for a gift, bequest, or donation. 10. Specifies that GO-Biz is the primary state agency authorized to attract foreign investments, cooperate in international public infrastructure projects, and support California businesses in accessing markets, and requires the Director of GO-Biz to develop an international trade and investment program attracting employment-producing direct foreign investment to the state SB 506 (Fuller) Page 5 of ? and provides support for California businesses in accessing international markets and increasing exports. 11. Authorizes GO-Biz to establish international trade and investment (ITI) offices outside of the U.S. according to certain requirements. Establishes processes and accountability measures for GO-Biz to accept private moneys to fund, establish and operate international trade offices. 12. Establishes the California Economic Development Fund in the State Treasury for the purpose of receiving federal, state, local, and private economic development funds, and receiving repayment of loans or grant proceeds and interest on those loans or grants. Provides that upon appropriation by the Legislature, moneys in the fund may be expended by GO-Biz to provide matching funds for loans or grants to public agencies, nonprofit organizations, and private entities, and for other economic development purposes, consistent with the purposes for which the moneys were received. This bill: Provisions relating to The Military and Aerospace Support Act 1. Enacts the Military and Aerospace Support Act. 2. Establishes the MA Program within GO-Biz to be proactive in retaining and expanding military facilities, the aerospace industry, and the jobs and intellectual capital associated with them in the state. States that the purpose of the MA Program is to provide a central clearinghouse for all defense retention, conversion, and base reuse activities in the state and interacting and communicating with military installations in the state and to retain and encourage growth in the aerospace and space flight industries through technical and regulatory advice, grants and other programs administered by GO-Biz or other state agencies. 3. Authorizes GO-Biz to establish a Military Advisory Council (Council) to provide input, information, technical advice, or other comments to the MA Program on military SB 506 (Fuller) Page 6 of ? related matters, including, but not limited to, active DoD installations in California and defense conversion issues. Provides that participation by Council members is voluntary and there is no reimbursement for per diem or expenses. Provides that the Council may include, but is not limited to, representatives from any legislative office, state agency, local government, industry, and civic or research organizations that may have an interest in defense related activities. 4. Requires the MA Program to do all of the following: a. Develop and recommend to the Governor and Legislature a strategic plan for state and local defense retention and conversion efforts. The plan shall address the state's role in assisting communities with potential base closures and those impacted by previous closures. GO-Biz may coordinate with other state agencies, local groups, and interested organizations on this strategic plan to retain current DoD installations, facilities, bases, and related civilian activities. b. Conduct outreach to entities and parties involved in defense retention and conversion across the state and provide a network to facilitate assistance and coordination for all defense retention and conversion activities within the state. c. Help develop and coordinate state retention advocacy efforts on the federal level. d. Until January 1, 2020, conduct an evaluation of existing state retention and conversion programs and provide the Legislature with recommendations on the continuation of existing programs, including, but not limited to, the possible elimination or alteration of those programs and provide recommendations to the Legislature on the necessity of new programs for defense retention and adequate funding levels. e. Update the plan prepared by the Defense Conversion Council as it existed on December 31, 1998, and any subsequent state agency reports, with the goal SB 506 (Fuller) Page 7 of ? to minimize California's loss of bases and jobs in future rounds of base closures. States that the new plan shall include, but not be limited to, identifying major installations in California, determining how best to defend existing bases and base employment in this state, coordinating retention activities with communities that may face base closures, developing data and analyses on bases in this state and coordinating with the state congressional delegation, the Legislature, and the Governor. Authorizes GO-Biz to temporarily borrow technical, policy, and administrative staff from other state agencies, including the Legislature. f. Serve as the primary state liaison with DoD and its installations in this state and assist in resolving any disputes or issues between the DoD and state entities. g. Review actions or programs by state agencies that may affect or impact DoD installations or the state's military base retention and reuse activities, and recommend to the Governor and the Legislature actions that may be taken to resolve or prevent similar problems in the future. 5. Authorizes the MA Program, providing that funds and resources are available, to also: a. Provide a central clearinghouse for all base retention or conversion assistance activities, including, but not limited to, employee training programs and regulation review and permit streamlining. b. Provide technical assistance to communities with potential or existing base closure activities. c. Provide a central clearinghouse for all defense retention and conversion funding, regulations, and application procedures for federal or state grants. d. Serve as a central clearinghouse for input and SB 506 (Fuller) Page 8 of ? information, including needs, issues, and recommendations from businesses, industry representatives, labor, local government, and communities relative to retention and conversion efforts. e. Identify available state and federal resources to assist businesses, workers, communities, and educational institutions that may have a stake in retention and conversion activities. f. Provide one-stop coordination, maintain and disseminate information, standardize state endorsement procedures, and develop fast-track review procedures for proposals seeking state funds to match funding from federal defense conversion programs. g. Maintain and establish databases in fields such as defense-related companies, industry organization proposals for the state and federal defense industry, community assistance, training, and base retention, and provide electronic access to the databases. 6. Authorizes GO-Biz to apply for grants and seek contributions from private industry to fund MA Program operations. Provides that any private funds shall be deposited into the Military and Aerospace Account. Authorizes GO-Biz to expend moneys in the account, upon appropriation by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act, only for the purposes outlined above related to the MA Program. Provides that records of funds received and expenditures made shall be subject to public disclosure and a report describing the receipt and expenditure of these funds shall be submitted to the Department of Finance, the Assembly Committee on Budget, and the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review at least biennially. 7. Requires GO-Biz to establish a Military Support Grant program (MS Grant Program) to grant funds to communities with DoD installations to assist them in developing a retention strategy. States that to discourage multiple grant applications for individual defense installations in a region, the criteria for grants shall be drafted to SB 506 (Fuller) Page 9 of ? encourage a single application for grant funds to develop a single regional defense retention strategy. Requires that the structure, requirements, administration, and funding procedures of the grant program be submitted to the Legislature for review at least 90 days prior to making the first grant disbursement. States that GO-Biz may only make a grant award if the local community provides at least 50 percent or more in matching funds or in-kind services, with at least 50 percent of that match being in the form of funding. 8. Requires GO-Biz to adopt necessary regulations to implement the MA Program and MS Grant Program and shall adopt these regulations as emergency regulations. Provisions Related to Local Military Retention Entities 9. Defines the following terms for provisions related to local retention entities: a. "Military installation" means a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other facility under the jurisdiction of the DoD. b. "Affected local government" means any county or city identified as located wholly or partly within the boundaries of a military installation or as having a sphere of influence over any portion of the installation with responsibility for local zoning and planning decisions. 10. Finds and declares the following: a. Because of the tremendous economic impact that military installations have on the state, it is in the best interest of the state to facilitate their retention. b. It is the intent of the Legislature to encourage cooperation among affected local governments in their efforts to retain military installations in this state by authorizing the creation of a joint powers authority. SB 506 (Fuller) Page 10 of ? 11. The Legislature also encourages affected local governments to engage other community-based organizations in their retention activities. 12. Requires a local retention authority (RA) to be recognized for each active military installation in this state. Requires a list of RAs or their successors, including, but not limited to, separate airport or port authorities recognized as the local retention authority for the military installations, to be maintained by OPR. Authorizes a joint powers authority to be designated or created if multiple affected local governments are identified as an affected local government. 13. Requires the state to recognize an RA for each active military installation if resolutions acknowledging it as the RA are adopted by all Boards of Supervisors (BOSs) and City Councils (CCs) for counties and cities identified as affected local governments. 14. Provides that, if prior to January 1, 2004, a local government was awarded grant moneys pursuant to any predecessor agency for a specific military installation and still qualifies as an affected local government, the recipient local government shall be recognized by the state as the RA unless resolutions acknowledging a different RA are adopted by all County BOSs and CCs for counties and cities identified as affected local governments. 15. Requires OPR, in consultation with GO-Biz, to recognize an RA for each military installation if the necessary resolutions are not adopted and forwarded before October 1, 2016 to OPR. 16. States that the RA shall be recognized by all state agencies as the local retention planning authority for the military installation and requires the state to encourage the federal government and other local jurisdictions to recognize these RAs. Provisions Related to the Space Enterprise Development Act 17. Enacts the Space Enterprise Development Act SB 506 (Fuller) Page 11 of ? and defines the necessary terms: 18. Requires GO-Biz to implement a space enterprise development program (Space Program) to foster activities that increase the competitiveness of space enterprise in California, including, but not limited to, the commercial use of space, space vehicle launches, space launch infrastructure, manufacturing, applied research, technology development, economic diversification, and business development. Authorizes GO-Biz to contract with other state or private agencies, nonprofit corporations, universities, firms, or individuals for the performance of technical or specialized work, or for services related to space enterprise development programs. 19. Authorizes GO-Biz to select a California nonprofit corporation to assist in the administration of space enterprise economic development activities through programs, projects, grants, partnerships, networks, and collaboration. Requires the nonprofit to be selected through a solicitation process that includes criteria for selection of the corporation, which includes, but is not limited to, demonstrated experience in space enterprise and the ability to perform space enterprise development activities. Establishes requirements for a contract between GO-Biz and the nonprofit which include quarterly reports of the nonprofit's activities and finances, conflict of interest provisions developed by GO-Biz and the ability for GO-Biz to cancel the contract if the nonprofit does not comply with requirements. Authorizes the nonprofit to perform one or more of the following activities, as determined contractually between GO-Biz and the nonprofit: a. Serve as the Authority. b. Pursue grants from the federal government or from private businesses, foundations, or individuals, for California space enterprise activities, including, but not limited to, studies, services, infrastructure improvements and modernization, and defense transition programs, to the extent permitted by law. c. Identify science and technology trends that are significant to space enterprise and the state and SB 506 (Fuller) Page 12 of ? act as a clearinghouse for space enterprise issues and information. d. Develop and implement a state strategy for applying and commercializing technology to create jobs, respond to industry changes, and foster innovation and competitiveness in space enterprise. e. Provide information to the Director relevant to changes in federal, state, and local statutes and regulations that will enhance the development of space enterprise in California. f. Provide information to GO-Biz regarding the development of laws, regulations, decisions, or determinations affecting the economic and employment impacts of space enterprise in California. g. Provide recommendations to the Director for appropriate state funding mechanisms and amounts to promote development of space enterprise in California, including education and workforce development. h. Provide recommendations to the director in the form of strategic planning documents. i. Review applications for, and promote, the California Space Enterprise Competitive Grant Program. 20. Requires the Authority to designate spaceports for the operation of launch sites or reentry sites and specifies that any city, county, city and county, special district, joint powers authority, or private entity, may apply to the Authority for designation as a spaceport. Sets forth application requirements. Designates an entity that has a federal launch site operator's license from the United States Secretary of Transportation under the authority of the Commercial Space Launch Act (49 U.S.C. Sec. 7101 et seq.) as a spaceport as long as they maintain their federal designation and provide proof of their extension to the Authority upon request. Clarifies that these provisions do not apply to any launch site operator who is federally licensed on or before January 1, 2005. SB 506 (Fuller) Page 13 of ? 21. Establishes the California Space Enterprise Competitive Grant Program (Space Grant Program) within GO-Biz to provide funding, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the development of space enterprise in California. Authorizes entities conducting activities intended to improve the competitiveness of space enterprise in California, including public, private, educational, commercial, nonprofit, or for-profit entities to apply for grants. Clarifies that space enterprise activities include, but are not limited to, the commercial use of space, space vehicle launches, space launch infrastructure, manufacturing, applied research, technology development, economic diversification, and business development. 22. Requires GO-Biz or the nonprofit acting as the Authority to issue solicitations that include minimum eligibility and requirements for grants and that address jobs created and retained by the implementation of the project, cost sharing by other project participants, a condition that grant funds will not be used to supplant other project funds, a demonstration that a majority of the project will be undertaken in California, an agreement among all project participants as to intellectual property rights relative to the project, the potential impact on the state's economy, the cost-effectiveness of the project, the importance of state funding for the viability of the project, a demonstration of technical feasibility and an assessment of programmatic risk. Requires an impartial review panel to evaluate grant proposals, comprised of technical and scientific experts and government representatives from throughout the state who are knowledgeable about activities related to space enterprise. Requires applications to be ranked and include recommendations as to the amount of state funding for each grant application and. States that the granting of funds to private entities serves a public purpose by assisting an industry vital to the health and welfare of the State of California. 23. Requires GO-Biz to adopt necessary regulations to implement the Space Program and Space Grant Program. SB 506 (Fuller) Page 14 of ? BACKGROUND Base Realignment and Closure California has a strategic location, unique landscape and valuable resources that help further U.S. military readiness for actions around the globe. As a result, the DoD has made many economic and technological investments in the state, including large investments in land and military installations. The state's unique resources and the military's investments have fostered a strong partnership, and the ensuing collaboration is vital for economic, resource management, and military readiness reasons. State and local economies are influenced by the military's presence. The burden of maintaining this partnership often falls on the shoulders of cities and counties. In addition to juggling the competing demands of expanding development, promoting economic development and upholding environmental quality standards, local governments must also consider the needs of local military installations in their land use planning. Traditionally, military installations were strategically located in underdeveloped areas so as to avoid land use conflicts. As the population of the state continues to grow and the land use needs of communities continue to expand outward, the need for stronger relationships and communication between local governments and the military developed. Without adequate communication and coordinated land use efforts, military missions, quality of life and public safety are increasingly jeopardized. Growth encroaching on a military installation so as to hinder its mission can contribute to the installation's closure. The federal government worked its way through four initial iterations of the BRAC process between late 1988 and 1993. Nationally, that process led to the closing of 350 large and small military bases and 55 major realignments. Reportedly, this saved federal taxpayers more than $16 billion through 2001 and six billion dollars more each subsequent year. Prior to 1988, California had, by far, the largest military presence of any state, and was home to 335,979 (14.7%) of the Department of Defense's (DoD) total 2,275,264 personnel and 91 (18.3%) of the 495 major military bases then scattered around the nation. Not surprisingly, the BRAC cuts fell heavily on SB 506 (Fuller) Page 15 of ? California. Through the first four rounds (1988, 1991, 1993, 1995), the state suffered the loss of 93,546 uniformed and civilian DoD jobs, which represented 53.8% of the net cuts nationally. California lost nearly 28 percent of its military personnel, while the rest of the nation saw a reduction of just 3.6 percent. In terms of major base closures, California lost 24 installations; Texas, seven; Pennsylvania, six; Illinois and New York, five each; and Florida, Indiana, Maryland and Virginia, four each. Prior to the mid 1990's, California's response to BRAC was primarily focused on assisting local communities in the reuse of shuttered military bases. In 1994, then-Governor Wilson issued an Executive Order (W-87-94) which directed the Governor's Office of Planning and Research to coordinate the state's effort to assist local communities in developing strategies to protect California bases from further closings, as a means of focusing on the importance military bases have on the state's economy. Subsequent legislation (AB 639, Alby, 1998 and SB 1099, Knight, 1999) codified an Office of Military Base Retention and Reuse (OMBRR), placing it within the Technology, Trade and Commerce Agency (TTCA) and outlining the responsibilities of the office, including the creation of a Defense Retention Grant Program. The grant program aided local communities in preparing for future BRAC rounds. SB 926 (Knight and Ashburn, 2004) then renamed OMBRR to the Office of Military and Aerospace Support (OMAS), signifying the close relationship between military and aerospace activities. OMAS exited through the 2005 BRAC round and subsequently sunsetted in January of 2007. Unlike previous rounds, the fifth BRAC round (2005) focused more on realignment than closure. Along with saving money, a top priority was military force readiness, consolidating assets onto centralized installations from which they can be deployed rapidly and flexibly in support of an evolving global situation, and joint service missions. Implementation of the 2005 BRAC recommendations was completed in 2011. When a military installation is closed or its tenant units SB 506 (Fuller) Page 16 of ? merely downsized, the communities in the area are adversely affected, particularly in the short-term. Military and civilian personnel face the loss or relocation of jobs. The uniformed personnel expect to be transferred regularly, but civilian workers on base usually are long-term local residents. Local retailers who support the bases directly or indirectly suffer serious revenue decreases and may even be forced to close. Area governments lose revenues needed to maintain services and infrastructure. In addition, the negotiation and execution of land transfer, environmental cleanup, and redevelopment of the properties can be a challenging, alien process to communities. The enabling BRAC statute typically provides a variety of mechanisms for disposing of property at closed or realigned military installations. In the past, some federal real property has been made available by public benefit conveyances for airport, education, and homeless assistance. Some have been converted to military reserve component bases. Others have been transferred to native American tribes. For some properties, economic development conveyances have been awarded to local redevelopment authorities. Some have been put up for public sale. The 2005 BRAC Commission recommended that Congress authorize another BRAC round in 2015, and then every 8 years thereafter. In 2012 then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta called for two BRAC rounds for 2013 and 2015, but Congress rejected Panetta's requests and also declined to fund a Pentagon request in 2014 to fund another BRAC round. Aerospace in California According to a recent report by the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC), the aerospace industry is comprised of companies that manufacture aircraft (civil and military), missiles, satellites and other space vehicles and the companies that manufacture and distribute parts and components. Buyers of these products include private industry, the military and government space administrations. The report notes that today, aerospace is a highly concentrated industry, dominated by a small number of large firms that are supported by a large number of smaller contractors. It is also characterized as a SB 506 (Fuller) Page 17 of ? capital intensive and high-value added industry. Profitability depends a great deal on technical expertise, innovation and the ability to accurately price long-term contracts for programs that may take years to design, develop and build. According to the report, demand for aerospace products is driven by both civil and military requirements. The California Spaceport Authority (Authority) to provide was originally created to recognize the support and unique services required for the development of commercial launch, manufacturing, and academic and research operations related to space flight. A nonprofit corporation was designated as the Authority with a mission of developing the commercial space industry in California and assisting with defense conversion efforts. AB 1475 (Bordonaro, Chapter 938, Statutes of 1997) then designated a new nonprofit corporation as the Authority and also created two grant programs to foster space flight-related infrastructure and associated activities -The Space Flight Competitive Grant Program and the Highway to Space Competitive Grant Program ultimately administered by two separate nonprofit entities, both responsible for the promotion of commercial space flight activities in the state. In 2003, all space flight related promotions and programs were consolidated under one entity and grant program with the passage of AB 1532 (Nakano, Chapter 627, Statutes of 2003) which tasked the Authority with responsibility for attraction and promotion of space flight industries in California and the administration of the space enterprise development program. Following the 2008 economic downturn, state and private funding for the Authority became limited or reallocated. In 2010, the nonprofit corporation selected to administer the space enterprise development program shuttered and no action was taken to select another nonprofit to administer the program. Language in the Government Code related to the Space Enterprise Development Program was repealed in 2014. California's robust aerospace industry suffered a significant downsizing and restructuring with the decline in military spending following the end of the Cold War and as a result of numerous BRAC rounds. In the early 1990s, there were efforts to retain many of California's aerospace companies and jobs through the development of commercial space activities on California's Central Coast at Vandenberg Air Force Base. These efforts generated legislation (AB 279, 1993) to designate California's SB 506 (Fuller) Page 18 of ? first Spaceport Authority. This designation then allowed this Authority to lease federal property deemed excess capacity under the Federal Commercial Space Launch Act. The excess property was known as Space Launch Complex (SLC 6) [Formerly West Coast launch site for the Space Shuttle]. According to a brief prepared by the California Research Bureau, aerospace is one of the nations standout industries. Its workforce is highly skilled and well paid~ its exports grow our economy~ and it is a continuing source of innovation. Aerospace encompasses a diverse range of productive activities, including the manufacturing of both civilian and military aircraft, space vehicles, guided missiles and associated parts. In 2011, California's aerospace industry produced over $31 billion worth of goods. Nationally, the aerospace industry produced more than $183 billion in goods in 2011. California represented 17 percent of this total. This was a slight increase over recent years. Overall, aerospace represented more than 72 percent of all transportation equipment manufacturing in California in 2011. Across all manufacturing sectors, aerospace contributed more than 6.3 percent of the $495 billion in manufactured goods produced in California in 2011. (Source: California Research Bureau, "CRB Briefly Stated: Aerospace Manufacturing in California's Economy," April 2012) COMMENT 1.According to the Author (paraphrased) : Despite the tremendous economic impact and jobs associated with defense and aerospace in California, there is no statewide entity designated in law responsible for helping retain military installations and grow aerospace activities. This bill recognizes the unique synergy between DoD activities in the state and aerospace/space flight industries, by designating GO-Biz as the lead state entity for fostering these two economic activities. Nothing in current law ensures there is a continuity of actions or focus from one administration to the next with respect to military installation issues and future base realignment and closures. While GO-Biz has the iHUB program with centers of innovation throughout the state that are typically focused on regional economic clusters (including SB 506 (Fuller) Page 19 of ? the Innovation Hub for Defense, Energy and Aerospace (iDEA Hub)), this system does not provide for a statewide focus on military installations as well as aerospace and spaceflight activities. The iDEA Hub region encompasses California's Kern, Ventura, Orange, Los Angeles, and San Diego counties but leaves out other significant aerospace/defense regions like the Central Coast and Silicon Valley. This bill provides continuity on issues related to military installations by designating GO-Biz as the statewide lead on fostering the state's military, aerospace and spaceflight sectors and provides flexibility for the administration to organize and operate programs by allowing GO-Biz to contract with other state or private agencies, nonprofit corporations, universities, firms, or individuals to fulfill any of its duties. California has benefited significantly from the spending on the war on terror starting in the early 2000's and that with a new round of base closures always on the horizon, California cannot wait to implement measures aimed at keeping military bases open and operational. Bigger and more immediate threats to military installations other than BRAC include federal budget reductions, non-BRAC force realignments and reductions in aircraft inventory. During past BRAC rounds, cities and counties within California were pitted against each other, fighting to keep their local base from closing and when a base was closed, there was confusion and debate over which local entity was responsible for the conversion and cleanup of the base. In some communities, multiple local jurisdictions claimed management and development rights to the closed base. A process was established to end these disputes that involved bringing the communities together to select single local base reuse authority. The law was then expanded to select a single local retention authority responsible for fending off future BRAC rounds and to promote the retention of the selected military base. This law was in effect during the 2005 BRAC round, but was subsequently sunsetted in January 2007. This bill would reestablish a process for one local retention authority to be recognized for each military installation in the state. SB 506 (Fuller) Page 20 of ? 2.Related Legislation Current Year: 1. SB 121 (Fuller, 2015 ) requires that school construction projects on military installations that are eligible for specified federal grants are given priority for funding under the State School Facility program. (Pending Senate Committee on Education) 2. AB 442 (Irwin, 2015 ) codifies the Governor's Military Council, under the direction of the California Military Department, and provides for appointment to the council by the Governor. (Pending Assembly Floor) 3. AB 1080 (Obernolte, 2015 ) authorizes the Department of Finance to find that an agreement between a former redevelopment agency and a joint powers authority that was created to exercise the powers provided by the Military Base Reuse Authority Act is an enforceable obligation. (Pending Assembly Committee on Local Government) 4. AJR 11 (Burke and Atkins, 2015 ) memorializes the President and the Congress of the United States to recognize the unique military value of California's defense installations and the disproportionate sacrifices California has endured in previous BRAC rounds. (Pending Senate Committee on Rules) Prior Years: 1. AB 1997 (Gorell, 2013 ) provided that tax exemptions for persons engaged in aircraft manufacturing, for use primarily in manufacturing, processing, refining, fabricating, or recycling of property, or research and development also applies to local sales and use taxes and those specified state taxes with respect to qualified tangible personal property purchased by a qualified person that is engaged in aircraft manufacturing of unmanned aerial vehicles. (Referred to but not heard in Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation) 2. AB 250 (Holden, Chapter 530, Statutes of 2013 ) codified the iHub program at GO-Biz and expanded the program. SB 506 (Fuller) Page 21 of ? 3. AB 737 (Fox, 2013 ) would have required GO-Biz to prepare and submit a proposal for an unmanned aircraft test site to the FAA on or before May 6, 2013. (Referred to but not heard in Senate Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development) 4. SB 245 (Rubio, 2011 ) would have re-established the Office of Military Support within the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) for the purpose of serving as a clearinghouse for state activities related to the military, including base closures.( Died on Suspense, Assembly Committee on Appropriations) 5. AB 29 (John A. Pérez, Chapter 475, Statutes of 2011 ) established GO-Biz within the Governor's Office for the purpose of serving as the lead entity for economic strategy and marketing of California on issues relating to business development, private sector investment and economic growth. 6. AB 2287 (Bass, 2010 ) would have established the Office of Economic Development, which includes the California Business Investment Services Program, within the then-Governor's Economic Development Office. (Gut-and-amended into a different topic while in its initial Assembly policy committee) 7. AB 2734 (John A. Perez, 2010 ) created the Office of Economic Development which included the California Business Investment Services Program within the Governor's Office. Required the Office to serve the Governor as the lead entity for economic strategy and marketing of California and make recommendations to the Governor and Legislature regarding polices, programs, and actions to advance statewide economic goals. (Vetoed.) 8. SB 1259 (DeSaulnier, 2010 ) would have created the Economic Development and Job Creation Agency and require the new agency to perform duties relating to economic development and job creation. It requires the secretary to develop a reorganization plan and propose a structure for the agency. (Died on Suspense, Senate Committee on Appropriations) SB 506 (Fuller) Page 22 of ? 9. AB 2711 (Portantino, 2008 ) Would have required the Secretary of Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency (BT & H) to develop a comprehensive state technology and innovation plan. Included a provision that extended the sunset date for the Office of Military and Aerospace Support (OMAS) from January 1, 2009 to January 1, 2012. (Died on Suspense, Assembly Committee on Appropriations) 10. SB 1698 (Ashburn, Chapter 681, Statutes of 2006 ) extended the authority for OMAS for two years, until January 1, 2009, and expanded the duties of the OMAS to include outreach to the aerospace industry for the purpose of fostering aerospace enterprises in California. 11. AB 2565 (Parra, Chapter 763, Statutes of 2004 ) requires that the strategic plan originally prepared by the California Defense Retention and Conversion Council as it existed in 1998 be updated. 12. AB 1202 (Laird, Chapter 330, Statues of 2005) replaced obsolete references to the Defense Conversion Council with OMAS and revised the definition of military bases, required the Director of OPR to select a mediator, in consultation with the federal Office of Economic Adjustment, to reach agreement among different jurisdictions on a local reuse entity in the event that the multiple local governments cannot agree on a single reuse entity for each base. 13. SB 926 (Knight and Ashburn, Chapter 907, Statutes of 2004 ) consolidated the defense retention and conversion efforts in the state. The bill changed the name of OMBRR to OMAS, transferred its functions to BTH, and set forth its duties and authority with respect to state and local defense retention and conversion, consolidating all such programs under a single office within state government. The bill also provided for the use of state Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank funds by local governments to develop projects on or near a military base that enhance the base's mission. 14. AB 1532 (Nakano, Chapter 627, Statutes of 2003 ) transferred the Technology Planning Program, California Space Enterprise Competitive Grant Program, and SB 506 (Fuller) Page 23 of ? the Challenge Grant Program in the TTCA to the BTH and referred to these programs as the Space Enterprise Development Program. 15. SB 296 (Soto, 2001 ) would have enacted the Department of Defense Operational Effectiveness Preparedness Act to help prevent any further base closures in the state. (Referred but not heard in Senate Committee on Governmental Organization) 16. SB 1468 (Knight, Chapter 971, Statutes of 2002 ) required cities and counties to include military installations, aviation routes, airspace, and readiness activities in their state-mandated general plans, and requires OPR to provide guidance to local officials as part of its advisory General Plan Guidelines. 17. SB 1099 (Knight, Chapter 425, Statutes of 1999 ), the California Defense Retention and Conversion Act, reconstituted the defunct Defense Conversion Council as the California Defense and Retention and Conversion Council as well as required the establishment of a Defense Retention Grant Program. 18. AB 639 (Alby Chapter 952, Statutes of 1998 ) enacted the Defense Conversion, Reuse and Retention Omnibus Act which was designed to assist communities in both closure and retention efforts. 19. AB 1475 (Bordonaro, Chapter 938, Statutes of 1997 ) established the California Space and Technology Alliance as the primary California Space Authority to oversee the operations of the California Space Flight Competitive Grant Program and the Highway to Space Program. 20. SB 268 (Roberti, Chapter 441, Statutes of 1993 ) created the Defense Conversion Matching Grant Program, administered by the Office of Strategic Technology within the Trade and Commerce Agency, and overseen by the Defense Conversion Council. Also appropriated $5.5 million from the Petroleum Violation Escrow Account to fund defense conversion efforts. 21. SB 458 (Hart, Chapter 445, Statutes of 1993 ) SB 506 (Fuller) Page 24 of ? enacted the California Defense Conversion Act of 1993 to enable the state to assume a leadership role in converting to a peacetime economy. Also created a 15-member Defense Conversion Council in the Trade and Commerce Agency with prescribed powers and duties, including the establishment of criteria for designation of regional technology alliances. POSITIONS Sponsor: Author Support: None on file (4/24/2015) Oppose: None on file (4/24/2015) -- END --