BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 516


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          516 (Fuller)


          As Amended  July 1, 2015


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  35-1


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Transportation  |16-0 |Frazier, Achadjian,   |                    |
          |                |     |Baker, Bloom, Campos, |                    |
          |                |     |Chu, Daly, Dodd,      |                    |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,       |                    |
          |                |     |Gomez, Kim, Linder,   |                    |
          |                |     |Medina, Melendez,     |                    |
          |                |     |Nazarian, O'Donnell   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |14-0 |Gomez, Bigelow,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonta,         |                    |
          |                |     |Calderon, Chang,      |                    |
          |                |     |Eggman, Gallagher,    |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,       |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Quirk, Rendon, |                    |








                                                                     SB 516


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Weber, Wood           |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Expands the primary purposes for which Service  
          Authorities for Freeway Emergencies (SAFEs) can use revenue from  
          a $1 vehicle registration surcharge to include other elements of  
          a motorist aid system in addition to call boxes.  Specifically,  
          this bill:  


          1)Authorizes SAFEs to use revenue from a $1 vehicle registration  
            surcharge for other elements of a motorist aid system in  
            addition to call boxes, such as traveler information systems,  
            intelligent transportation system architecture, transportation  
            demand management services, and safety-related hazard and  
            obstruction removal.


          2)Explicitly provides that SAFEs are responsible for determining  
            how vehicle registration surcharge revenue is to be used,  
            except that the California Department of Transportation  
            (Caltrans) and the California Highway Patrol (CHP) will  
            continue to be responsible for reviewing and approving plans  
            related to call boxes.


          3)Declares that funding provided by a SAFE for changeable  
            message signs, traveler information systems, intelligent  
            transportation systems, transportation demand management  
            services, and safety-related hazard and obstruction removal is  
            intended to supplement, not replace, Caltrans' expenditures  
            for similar improvements and services.


          4)Makes other, non-substantive but related amendments to  
            provisions related to motorist aid systems.








                                                                     SB 516


                                                                    Page  3







          EXISTING LAW:


          1)Authorizes county boards of supervisors and city councils to  
            establish SAFEs for their county; authorizes the Metropolitan  
            Transportation Commission and the Sacramento Area Councils of  
            Government to be the SAFE for counties within their respective  
            jurisdictions.


          2)Authorizes SAFEs to impose a $1 fee on vehicles registered in  
            the county to implement, maintain, and operate a motorist aid  
            system of call boxes on the California Freeway and Expressway  
            System, county expressway systems, unincorporated county  
            roads, and state highway routes within the county.


          3)Directs Caltrans and the CHP to review and approve proposed  
            implementation plans and plan updates for motorist aid systems  
            of call boxes.


          4)Authorizes SAFEs to use any money received in excess of funds  
            needed to fully implement and operate call box systems for  
            additional motorist aid services or support, such as  
            changeable message signs, lighting, and support for traffic  
            operations center.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, negligible state fiscal impact.


          COMMENTS:  SAFE programs were first authorized in 1985 to fund  
          and implement a motorist aid system of call boxes.  Call boxes  
          provide a direct communication link to the CHP and are available  
          to motorists to seek assistance for, for example, mechanical  








                                                                     SB 516


                                                                    Page  4





          breakdowns, flat tires, traffic accidents, or other incidents.   
          According to Caltrans, 29 of the state's 58 counties have call  
          box programs.  These range from the system in Los Angeles  
          County, with more than 4,000 call boxes, to Humboldt and Del  
          Norte Counties, where only a few call boxes have been installed  
          in particularly isolated areas.  


          Call box usage peaked in about 1996 and has steadily declined  
          since, due primarily to the proliferation of cell phones.  For  
          example, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)  
          reports that in 1996, over 216,000 calls were made on a network  
          of over 3,000 call boxes in the nine-county MTC region.  Those  
          numbers declined to less than 13,000 calls made on a network  
          1,600 call boxes in 2014.  


          This bill will authorize SAFEs to look beyond just call boxes to  
          provide motorist aid systems.  The expanded list of allowable  
          expenditures provided for in this bill will allow SAFEs to use  
          newer technology, such as phone- and Web-based 511 traveler  
          information systems.  SAFEs have long been able to use their  
          funds for some of these other components but only if they had  
          revenue in excess of that needed to fully build out and operate  
          a call box system.  This bill gives SAFEs flexibility to design  
          and implement whatever motorist aid system will work best in  
          their county.  For instance, while some rural areas may prefer  
          call boxes on remote state highways, urban regions may find  
          additional intelligent transportation systems architecture a  
          more relevant service for congestion relieve and safety  
          purposes.  


          Caltrans and the CHP will continue to maintain approval  
          authority over plans related to call box systems.












                                                                     SB 516


                                                                    Page  5





          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093  FN:  
          0001482