BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 524 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 524 (Lara) As Amended August 17, 2015 Majority vote SENATE VOTE: 35-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Human Services |7-0 |Chu, Mayes, Calderon, | | | | |Lopez, Maienschein, | | | | |Mark Stone, Thurmond | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |16-0 |Gomez, Bigelow, | | | | |Bloom, Bonta, | | | | |Calderon, Chang, | | | | |Nazarian, Eggman, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Eduardo Garcia, | | | | |Holden, Jones, Quirk, | | | | |Rendon, Wagner, | | | | |Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | SB 524 Page 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY: Establishes a new type of community care facility - a private or public residential care facility for youth - and provides for its licensure and regulation. Specifically, this bill: 1)Makes Legislative findings and declarations related to nontraditional treatment programs for children, including that such facilities: receive numerous allegations of abuse, including death; currently operate unlicensed in California; advertise services for youth who may feel they have no other options; and have students who may have been previous victims of trauma, experienced parental rejection based on actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity, and have mental health and substance use issues. Further, states the intent of the Legislature that the state license private or public residential care facilities for youth as community care facilities to ensure the safety of children residing in those facilities. 2)Defines "private or public residential care facility for youth" as a facility or program licensed by the Department of Social Services (DSS) as a community care facility to provide nonmedical care, counseling, or education or vocational support to persons under the age of 18 with social, emotional, behavioral, or mental health issues or disorders. Further, specifies that a private or public residential care facility for youth may provide any of the following: a program with wilderness or outdoor experience, expedition, or intervention; a boot camp or related experience; a therapeutic boarding school; or a behavior modification program. 3)Requires DSS to license a private or public residential care facility for youth as a community care facility. SB 524 Page 3 4)Prohibits DSS from licensing a private or public residential care facility for youth unless all therapeutic components of the programs provided are appropriately licensed. 5)Requires staff members of private or public residential care facility for youth who supervise residents to receive training, as specified. Further, specifies components to be included in a private or public residential care facility for youth's training plan, including components that DSS shall establish by adopting regulations, and requires the facility to submit its training plan to DSS for approval prior to implementing it. 6)States that a staff member of a private or public residential care facility for youth is a mandated child abuse reporter, pursuant to current law. 7)Enumerates rights of residents of private or public residential care facilities for youth, including, but not limited to, the right to: be free of corporal punishment, deprivation of basic necessities, including education, as a punishment, deterrent, or incentive, and physical restraints of any kind; be free from abusive, humiliating, degrading, or traumatizing actions; be accorded dignity in his or her relationships; and have frequent contact with parents or guardians. Further, requires a list of these rights to be publically posted and accessible to residents. 8)Prohibits a private or public residential care facility for youth from accepting for placement or providing services to a child assessed as seriously emotionally disturbed, with exceptions as specified. SB 524 Page 4 9)Prohibits a private or public residential care facility for youth from advertising or otherwise promoting services, as specified, related to alcohol or drug use treatment unless the facility has been licensed accordingly. 10)Prohibits a private or public residential care facility for youth from using secure containment or restraints of any kind, with specified exceptions. 11)States that a private or public residential care facility for youth is not an eligible placement option for dependents or wards of the court, and is not eligible for a foster care group home rate. 12)Prohibits a private or public residential care facility for youth from accepting for residential placement any child under the age of 12. 13)Requires a licensee of a private or public residential care facility for youth that advertises or otherwise promotes special care, programming, or environments for persons with mental health, emotional, or social challenges to provide prospective residents and their parents or guardians with a written description of its programs and services prior to admission. 14)Makes conforming technical changes. EXISTING LAW: 1)Establishes the California Community Care Facilities Act to SB 524 Page 5 provide for the licensure and regulation of community care facilities. (Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 1500 et seq.) 2)Defines "community care facility" to mean any facility, place, or building that is maintained and operated to provide nonmedical residential care, day treatment, adult day care, or foster family agency services for children, adults, or children and adults, including, but not limited to, individuals with physical disabilities or mental impairments and abused or neglected children. Includes within this definition, among a number of other facilities: group homes, foster family homes, small family homes, full-service adoption agencies, noncustodial adoption agencies, and transitional shelters. (HSC Section 1502) 3)Requires community care facilities operating in California, as specified, to have a valid license. (HSC Section 1503.5) FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, this bill may result in the following costs: 1)One-time costs to DSS potentially in excess of $250,000 (General Fund) to develop two sets of regulations for the new licensure category, for the establishment of the new regulatory category as well as for the training plan requirements for these programs. 2)Potentially significant ongoing costs likely in excess of $500,000 (General Fund) to the DSS Community Care Licensing (CCL) Division to license, monitor, and inspect additional facilities, to be offset by the authority to charge both application and regulatory fees. Ongoing costs would be dependent on the number of entities impacted statewide, which SB 524 Page 6 is unknown and difficult to ascertain, making it difficult to understand the full cost implications of this bill. To the extent the number of new licensees is significant, CCL would require additional field staff for monitoring and oversight. 3)Potential non-reimbursable local enforcement costs, offset to a degree by fine revenue to the extent licensing and regulatory violations are enforced and prosecuted. COMMENTS: Residential facilities for youth with emotional and behavioral challenges: In 2008, the United States General Accountability Office (GAO) released a report entitled, "Residential Facilities: Improved Data and Enhanced Oversight Would Help Safeguard the Well-Being of Youth with Behavioral and Emotional Challenges." This reported described the proliferation since the 1990s of residential facilities serving youth with behavioral and emotional challenges. These facilities include boarding schools and academies, boot camps, and wilderness camps. Some such facilities have spawned reports of health and safety risks for the youth who attend them. According to the GAO report, "annual investigations by the Civil Rights Division within the Department of Justice, have detailed incidents of abuse and neglect, which in some cases have been severe enough to result in hospitalization or death." Regarding the licensure and regulation of these types of facilities, the 2008 GAO report observed that: States are primarily responsible for ensuring the well-being of youth in facilities and other settings, and states vary in how they license and monitor facilities in accordance with individual state standards of care. In SB 524 Page 7 addition, in return for receiving funds under various federal grant programs, state agencies agree to comply with federal program requirements, including those related to youth well-being. These programs generally fall under the purview of three federal agencies: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provides funds to states for child welfare, mental health, and substance abuse; the Department of Justice (DOJ), for serving delinquent youth; and the Department of Education (Education), for educating youth. These agencies have authority to hold states accountable for state-operated or private facilities that serve youth under federally funded state programs. However, the federal government does not have oversight authority for other private facilities that serve only youth placed and funded by parents or other private entities. Nonetheless, the federal government has taken note of these types of facilities and the potentially associated problems. The existence of a GAO report on the issue is a testament to this, as were bills introduced in Congress. While it ultimately didn't pass, the "Stop Child Abuse in Residential Programs for Teens Act" was introduced in 2013 (H.R. 1981) and 2014 (S. 2054). This Act would have required certain standards and enforcement provisions for the prevention of child abuse and neglect in residential programs. Need for this bill: According to the author: Tragically, many young people have experienced horrendous abuse, neglect, and even death at unregulated boot camps, wilderness camps, and residential institutions. Survivors report being denied medical care, corporal punishment, solitary confinement, discrimination due to sexual orientation. Often parents and guardians have no idea that the facility they are sending their child to is SB 524 Page 8 not held to any standards and does not have any oversight. The current lack of oversight and regulations over these private institutions has opened up California's most vulnerable youth to abuse. While private institutions should retain the right to offer the unique programs they specialize in, all children regardless of where they are should have their essential health and safety needs met. Analysis Prepared by: Daphne Hunt / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089 FN: 0001606