BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Bill No: |SB 526 |Hearing |4/29/15 | | | |Date: | | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Author: |Fuller |Tax Levy: |No | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Version: |4/14/15 |Fiscal: |Yes | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Grinnell | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- PERSONAL INCOME TAXES: JOINT RETURNS: RELIEF FROM LIABILITY. Directs FTB to consider the terms of a divorce settlement when determining whether to grant equitable relief on a taxpayer's own income. Background and Existing Law Spouses filing as "married filing jointly" are individually responsible for the return's accuracy and the tax liability, regardless of the amount of income each spouse generates, often called "joint and several" liability. However, a court may revise this liability in a proceeding for the dissolution of the marriage, but cannot relieve a spouse of tax liability on income that he or she earns or has exclusive management and control over. Because spouses can occasionally misrepresent tax information on a joint return without the knowledge of the other spouse, federal law allows an innocent spouse to qualify for relief under specified circumstances, which California conforms to for the most part. To qualify for "innocent spouse relief" for state income tax purposes: The taxpayer must elect to do so within two years of the beginning of involuntary collection activities, SB 526 (Fuller) 4/14/15 Page 2 of ? The taxpayer must demonstrate the he or she did not know and had no reason to know of the understatement of tax at the time the return was signed. Franchise Tax Board (FTB) must determine that it's inequitable to hold the innocent spouse liable, taking into account all facts and circumstances. FTB can also reassign liabilities to the responsible spouse or registered domestic partner (RDPs). The taxpayer must satisfy all of the above requirements, but also must be divorced, separated, or living apart from the other person on the joint return for 12 months before making the election to request relief. Additionally, the Legislature directed Franchise Tax Board (FTB) to allow similar relief for California income taxes whenever the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) does under the following conditions (SB 285, Speier, 2003, and SB 1055, Walters, 2010): The taxpayer requests the same relief from FTB that they did from the IRS, The taxpayer furnishes FTB with a copy of the IRS's determination, The facts and circumstances that apply to the understatement and the liabilities for which the relief is requested are the same; The non-requesting spouse has the opportunity to provide information to FTB that is contrary to information submitted by the requesting spouse. For those not meeting the above requirements, taxpayers can also request "equitable relief" from FTB for self-assessed unpaid taxes reported on a joint return, similar to federal law. While not part of the law, FTB states that it considers the following factors when determining whether to relieve individuals of liability of unpaid taxes or any deficiency: The taxpayer's current marital/registered domestic partner status. Documented proof of abuse from spouse/RDP during SB 526 (Fuller) 4/14/15 Page 3 of ? marriage or registered domestic partnership. Proof that when the taxpayer signed the tax return, he or she expected to satisfy the tax liability. In the case of tax resulting from an audit, the taxpayer wasn't aware of the tax liability understatement. The taxpayer's current financial situation and ability to pay the tax liability. Whether a divorce decree, termination of a registered domestic partnership, or the legally binding agreement identifies one taxpayer as legally liable to pay the tax liability. Whether the taxpayer received a significant benefit from the unpaid income tax liability or tax deficiency. Taxpayer compliance with income tax laws in later tax years, FTB must notify the other spouse, ex-spouse, RDP, or ex-RDP to allow the non-requesting spouse/RDP an opportunity to provide documentation to grant relief. FTB also notifies them of any action, and provides the non-requesting spouse/RDP with an opportunity to appeal. IRS Revenue Procedures set forth the requirements for equitable relief at the federal level, including that the taxpayer requesting relief did not know or have reason to know that there was an understatement or deficiency on the joint return. IRS recently expanded its equitable relief provisions to provide that this requirement is satisfied when the requesting spouse has been abused and didn't challenge anything on the joint return for fear of the nonrequesting spouse's retaliation. Because federal and state statutes are very similar, so FTB usually applies IRS revenue procedures for innocent spouse relief for California cases; however, taxpayers who don't obtain relief can appeal these decisions to the Board of Equalization (BOE). In the recent BOE case, Appeal of Tonya M. Jarrell, the taxpayer appealed FTB's denial of equitable relief for past unpaid taxes. SB 526 (Fuller) 4/14/15 Page 4 of ? FTB stated that the taxpayer failed to establish that she had reason to believe that her tax liability would be paid when the return was filed, she didn't provide documentation showing she didn't know about the liabilities, and current law doesn't allow innocent spouse relief for income exclusively attributable to the innocent spouse. The taxpayer argued that the divorce settlement between her and her husband allocated the obligation to pay delinquent taxes to him, so she should be absolved of any tax debt. BOE Member George Runner wants to require FTB to positively consider an instance where the individual's liability has been revised under a judgment of dissolution of marriage when deciding whether to grant equitable relief from liability on income they earn or is exclusively under their control. SB 526 (Fuller) 4/14/15 Page 5 of ? Proposed Law Senate Bill 526 provides that when FTB is considering a request for relief from liability for income earned by the requesting spouse or under his or her exclusive management and control, the fact that an individual's liability for unpaid taxes or deficiency has been revised under a judgment of dissolution of marriage may be a factor weighing in favor of the requesting taxpayer, when the State Revenue Impact Pending. Comments 1. Purpose of the bill . According to the author, "According to members of the Board of Equalization (BOE), the BOE has adjudicated a number of appeals from the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) that have involved taxpayers who believed they had successfully divided assets and debts, including tax liabilities, in a divorce agreement. Current law does not allow the FTB, and by extension the BOE in its quasi-judicial function, to rely on a marital settlement agreement to relieve a spouse of a joint income tax liability unless the agreement meets a number of technical conditions contained in Revenue and Taxation Code section 19006(b). SB 526 grants the FTB the authority to consider a divorce agreement as a factor weighing in favor of granting relief when a taxpayer requests that the agency assign outstanding tax liabilities to the spouse who agreed to pay them, rather than holding both parties jointly liable. The current law forces the spouse requesting relief to return to court in order to have the marital settlement agreement enforced. After negotiating a fair division of assets and debts, taxpayers are surprised when they learn that their agreement will not be honored by the state government. By providing the FTB the ability to abide by the agreement that was negotiated between spouses, this would limit additional needless litigation in both the courts of California as well as appeals to the Board of Equalization." SB 526 (Fuller) 4/14/15 Page 6 of ? 2. Precedent . Innocent spouse relief exists for tax agencies to provide relief from joint tax liabilities for taxpayers who signed joint returns with their spouses, but were kept in the dark about the other spouse's income, business interests, or financial activities. IRS and FTB grant innocent spouse relief to these taxpayers because they have no legitimate reason to know that they have a tax obligation arising from items about which they had no knowledge. Only in a few, limited circumstances has the IRS granted relief for unpaid liability on income earned by the requesting spouse, because that spouse should know that tax applies whenever he or she earns income. SB 526 sets a new precedent to allow FTB, or BOE as part of an appeal of FTB's determination, to grant relief on the requesting spouse's own income in any case where the requesting spouse has a divorce agreement obligating the non-requesting spouse to pay any outstanding taxes. IRS's recent guidance indicates that it will grant relief on the requesting spouse's own income in cases of abuse or misappropriation of funds, and FTB will follow that guidance regardless of any legislative change, so SB 526 will only apply in cases where no abuse or misappropriation of funds occurred, putting the state out of conformity with federal treatment. The Committee may wish to consider the precedent SB 526 sets. 3. Not so innocent ? Divorce settlements result from often difficult negotiations between two former spouses to allocate their former joint assets and liabilities, which often involve tax debts. Existing law allows taxpayers to have the liability revised by a court proceeding for dissolution of marriage. The order must separately state the income tax liabilities for the taxable years for which revision is granted. Taxpayers with income above a specified amount also must obtain a tax revision clearance certificate from FTB to give to a court issuing the divorce settlement, detailing the amounts of tax, interest, and penalties due to ensure this information is incorporated into the settlement. Under SB 526, FTB or BOE could grant the requesting spouse equitable relief merely by showing that the settlement agreement revised any unpaid tax, thereby shifting the obligation from the requesting spouse to the other one. Spouses could then seek to reassign tax debts on their own income for specific taxable years to their former spouses, when the divorce settlement only speaks in more general terms about tax debts from income generated by one spouse or the other, or both, without being specific to the taxable year. Additionally, SB 526 (Fuller) 4/14/15 Page 7 of ? SB 526 doesn't compel notification to the other spouse, or grant him or her opportunity to comment, which innocent spouse relief provisions currently require. The Committee may wish to consider whether SB 526 provides leverage to revise a previously settled divorce agreement. Support and Opposition 4/23/15 Support : BOE Member George Runner. Opposition : Unknown. -- END --