BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 526|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                UNFINISHED BUSINESS 


          Bill No:  SB 526
          Author:   Fuller (R) and Runner (R)
          Amended:  1/13/16  
          Vote:     21 

           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE:  6-0, 4/29/15
           AYES:  Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Pavley
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Moorlach

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  7-0, 5/28/15
           AYES:  Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen

           SENATE FLOOR:  39-0, 6/2/15
           AYES:  Allen, Anderson, Bates, Beall, Berryhill, Block,  
            Cannella, De León, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Glazer, Hall,  
            Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Lara, Leno,  
            Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Moorlach,  
            Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Runner, Stone,  
            Vidak, Wieckowski, Wolk
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Jackson

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  78-0, 8/11/16 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote

           SUBJECT:   Personal income taxes:  joint returns:  court  
                     orders:  relief from liability


          SOURCE:    Board of Equalization Member George Runner

          DIGEST:   This bill allows a court as part of a proceeding for  
          the dissolution of a marriage to revise the person responsible  
          for tax on income earned by his or her spouse or under their  
          exclusive management and control under specified circumstances.









                                                                     SB 526  
                                                                    Page  2




          Assembly Amendments delete the bill's provisions directing the  
          Franchise Tax Board (FTB) to consider the terms of a divorce  
          settlement when determining whether to grant equitable relief on  
          a taxpayer's own income, and instead allow a court as part of a  
          proceeding for the dissolution of a marriage to revise the  
          person responsible for tax on income earned by his or her spouse  
          or under their exclusive management and control.


          ANALYSIS: 


          Existing law:


          1)Requires spouses and registered domestic partners (RDPs)  
            filing as "married filing jointly" to be individually  
            responsible for the return's accuracy and the tax liability,  
            regardless of the amount of income each spouse generates,  
            often called "joint and several" liability. 


          2)Empowers courts to revise liabilities in a proceeding for the  
            dissolution of the marriage under specified circumstances, so  
            long as the court order:


             a)   Separately states the income tax liabilities for the  
               taxable years for which revision of tax liability is  
               granted.


             b)   Does not revise a tax liability that has been fully paid  
               prior to the effective date of the order; however, any  
               unpaid amount may be revised.


             c)   Becomes effective when FTB is served with or  
               acknowledges receipt of the order.










                                                                     SB 526  
                                                                    Page  3



          3)Provides that court orders revising liabilities are only  
            effective if the gross income reportable on the return exceeds  
            $150,000, or the amount of liability exceeds $7,500, unless a  
            tax revision certificate is obtained from FTB and filed with  
            the court.


          4)Does not allow a court to relieve a spouse of tax liability on  
            income that he or she earns or has exclusive management and  
            control over.


          This bill:


          1)Allows a court to revise the individual responsible for all or  
            part of the liability as part of a proceeding for dissolution  
            of the marriage so long as the overall liability is not  
            reduced.


          2)Increases the threshold for the order to be effective from  
            $150,000 in gross income to $200,000, or $7,500 in liability  
            to $10,000, and indexes both amounts for changes in inflation  
            as measured by the California Consumer Price Index.  


          3)Provides that any court order revising the individual  
            responsible for tax liability on income earned by or subject  
            to the exclusive management and control of that spouse shall  
            not be effective if:


             a)   The individuals filing the joint return transfer assets  
               or liabilities between themselves for the principal purpose  
               of avoidance of the payment of tax or as part of a  
               fraudulent scheme by those individuals, or


             b)   The liability is uncollectible, and within three years  
               of the date the court order is effective, the spouse  
               obligated to pay that liability under the court order files  








                                                                     SB 526  
                                                                    Page  4



               for bankruptcy and discharges the liability in bankruptcy,  
               or becomes a nonresident.


          4)Applies to court orders served or acknowledged on or after the  
            bill's effective date.


          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No


          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the fiscal  
          effects of this bill are unknown and impossible to calculate.  
          While this bill does not change the amount of tax liability owed  
          to the state, it could reduce collections by concentrating tax  
          liability among one spouse rather than proportionally. For every  
          $1 million granted in tax relief, an estimated $60,000 in GF  
          revenue would be lost.


          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/12/16)


          Board of Equalization Member George Runner (source)
          Board of Equalization Member Fiona Ma


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/12/16)


          None received


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:     According to the author, "SB 526 will  
          help state tax agencies honor a divorce agreement that assigns  
          tax liability as part of the process of dividing assets and  
          liabilities.  Supporters point out that the Board of  
          Equalization (BOE) regularly hears income tax case appeals where  
          a spouse has requested that the BOE enforce the terms of a  
          divorce decree and assign a tax liability to the spouse who has  
          agreed to pay it. In these cases, the FTB assigned a tax  








                                                                     SB 526  
                                                                    Page  5



          liability to both spouses despite an agreement in the divorce  
          proceedings to allocate payment of the tax liability  
          differently."
           

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  78-0, 8/11/16
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker,  
            Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke,  
            Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley,  
            Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth  
            Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto,  
            Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper,  
            Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine,  
            Linder, Lopez, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina,  
            Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen,  
            Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago,  
            Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber,  
            Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Roger Hernández, Low


          Prepared by:Colin Grinnell / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119
          8/12/16 13:23:54


                                   ****  END  ****