BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE
                         Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair
                                2015 - 2016  Regular 

                              
          
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Bill No:  |SB 540                           |Hearing    |4/22/15  |
          |          |                                 |Date:      |         |
          |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------|
          |Author:   |Hertzberg                        |Tax Levy:  |No       |
          |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------|
          |Version:  |4/15/15                          |Fiscal:    |Yes      |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Consultant|Bouaziz                                               |
          |:         |                                                      |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

                   FRANCHISE TAX BOARD:  TAXPAYERS' RIGHTS ADVOCATE



          Repeals the sunset provision and removes the relief amount limit  
          for the Taxpayer Advocate Equity Relief Program.


           Background and Existing Law

           Under federal law, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may abate  
          any unpaid portion of tax or any liability related to tax  
          assessed erroneously.  The IRS also has discretion to abate any  
          interest assessed that is attributable to any unreasonable error  
          or delay by the IRS when performing a managerial or ministerial  
          act, but only if no significant aspect of the error or delay can  
          be attributed to the taxpayer involved.  The error or delay must  
          have occurred after the taxpayer was contacted in writing about  
          the deficiency or payment.  There is no limit on the amount of  
          relief the IRS may grant and the federal relief provision is  
          permanent.

          Under current state law, the office of the Taxpayer Advocate  
          (Advocate) within the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) was created to  
          coordinate the resolution of taxpayer complaints and problems.   
          The Advocate can review actions taken on a taxpayer's account.   
          Existing law authorizes the Advocate to resolve taxpayer issues  
          identified by FTB, and to grant relief from penalties, fees, or  
          interest attributable to any of the following:








          SB 540 (Hertzberg) 4/15/15                              Page 2  
          of ?


                 Erroneous action or erroneous inaction by FTB in  
               processing documents filed or payments made by taxpayers.

                 Unreasonable delay caused by FTB.

                 Erroneous written advice that does not qualify for  
               relief under the Chief Counsel's authority.

          Relief may be granted only in situations where no significant  
          aspect of the error is attributable to the taxpayer and relief  
          is unavailable under any other statute or regulation.

          The total amount of relief that may be granted under the  
          Advocate's discretionary authority and the threshold for  
          approval are indexed annually for inflation.  For tax year 2013,  
          total relief granted under the Advocate's discretionary  
          authority may not exceed $7,600, and relief in excess of $509  
          must be approved by FTB's Executive Officer.

          Relief at any level requires a public record to be placed in the  
          office of FTB's Executive Officer that includes the following  
          information:

                 The taxpayer's name,

                 The total amount involved,

                 The amount payable or refundable due to the error or  
               delay, and

                 A summary of why the relief is warranted.

          A refund may be paid as a result of the relief granted only if  
          the written claim for relief is received by the Advocate within  
          the applicable statute of limitations.  Any decision for relief  
          is not subject to review in any administrative or judicial  
          proceeding and no other entity may participate in the grant or  
          denial of relief. 

          The Advocate relief provisions will be repealed on January 1,  
          2016, unless an enacted statute extends this date.


           Proposed Law








          SB 540 (Hertzberg) 4/15/15                              Page 3  
          of ?



           Senate Bill 540 removes the sunset provision and the limit on  
          the amount of relief that shall be granted.  Additionally the  
          bill specifies the retention period to be at least one year for  
          records of relief granted. Under SB 540, relief shall be granted  
          by the Advocate in coordination with FTB's Chief Counsel. 


           State Revenue Impact

           Unknown.


           Comments

           1.  Purpose of the bill.   According to the author, "Filing taxes  
          can be challenging; it's even more frustrating for individuals  
          who fall victim to administrative errors and delays from the tax  
          collection agency.  SB 540 improves the Taxpayers' Rights  
          Advocate program at the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB).   
          This program allows the Taxpayer Advocate to abate a taxpayer's  
          penalties, interest, and fees that occur because of erroneous  
          actions by the Franchise Tax Board's staff.  Legislation created  
          this program in 2009 and it is set to expire on January 1, 2016.  
           SB 540 would make improvements to the current program by  
          removing a burdensome application process for taxpayers,  
          removing the dollar limitation on the abatement amount, and by  
          clarifying that the Chief Counsel approves each request. SB 540  
          will extend and make permanent this valuable taxpayer relief  
          program." 

          2.  The Taxpayers' Rights Advocate: Background.   In 1988, the  
          Katz-Harris Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Act codified many existing  
          FTB administrative procedures and clarified the rights of  
          California taxpayers.  It also established the position of a  
          Taxpayers' Rights Advocate to provide specified protections for  
          taxpayers, including a resolution of taxpayer complaints and  
          problems.  On July 30, 1996, the federal Taxpayer Bill of Rights  
          was passed, and later, California followed by enacting the  
          Taxpayers' Rights:  Conformity Legislation.  A few years later,  
          the California Legislature created the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights  
          Act of 1999, further increasing protection of taxpayers' rights.  










          SB 540 (Hertzberg) 4/15/15                              Page 4  
          of ?


          The Advocate reports directly to the FTB's Executive Officer.   
          The Advocate or his/her designee coordinates the resolution of  
          taxpayer complaints and problems, and, if appropriate, may  
          postpone enforcement action while the case is under review.  In  
          2008, the Legislature temporarily provided the Advocate with the  
          discretionary authority to grant relief to taxpayers under  
          limited circumstances.  Specifically, beginning in January 1,  
          2009, the Advocate was allowed to provide relief from penalties,  
          fees, additions to tax, or interest imposed on a taxpayer  
          because of erroneous actions or inactions of the FTB.  

          3.  Is the Advocate's permanent authority justified?   FTB notes  
          that, in the absence of the Advocate's authority to grant  
          relief, eligible taxpayers do have other avenues for obtaining  
          relief from penalties, fees, additions to tax or interest.  For  
          example, taxpayers may appeal to the State Board of Equalization  
          (BOE), file a lawsuit for refund of taxes with a court, or file  
          a claim with the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board  
          for refund of tax or losses caused by the action or inaction of  
          a state agency.  However, in those cases, the taxpayers most  
          likely will have to incur additional costs, which may exceed the  
          amount of penalties, interest, or other additions to tax.  FTB  
          argues that the Advocate has prudently applied the discretionary  
          authority and it is time to re-enact the law without the sunset  
          provision.  

          4.  Use of the Program.   Since the enactment of the law on  
          January 1, 2009, there have been three occurrences where the  
          Advocate exercised its authority and provided relief to  
          taxpayers.  These occurrences are described below:  

                 Interest was abated in the amount of $2,100 for a  
               taxpayer because of an erroneous action of processing the  
               taxpayer's return.

                 Interest was abated in the amount of $1,800 for a  
               taxpayer because of an unreasonable delay in issuing a bill  
               because of a technology upgrade.  

                 Interest totaling $1.1 million was abated for a group of  
               50 taxpayers including multiple years because of erroneous  
               written advice contained in the California Fiduciary tax  
               form instructions.  The relief granted to each taxpayer was  
               below the statutory limit.








          SB 540 (Hertzberg) 4/15/15                              Page 5  
          of ?




           Support and  
          Opposition   (4/17/15)


           Support  :  California Taxpayers Association (CalTax); Franchise  
          Tax Board.


           Opposition  :  Unknown.



                                      -- END --