BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 541 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 29, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE Anthony Rendon, Chair SB 541 (Hill) - As Amended June 2, 2015 SENATE VOTE: 40-0 SUBJECT: Public Utilities Commission: for-hire transportation carriers: enforcement. SUMMARY: This bill codifies the State Auditor report's recommendations on strengthening the California Public Utilities Commission's (CPUC) oversight of transportation-related activities of household goods carriers and charter party carriers (CPC). Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires the CPUC to establish the following goals related to its existing authority to provide oversight and regulation of transportation-related activities of household goods carriers and CPCs: Prioritize the timely processing of applications and hold "application workshops" for potential applicants around the state, Enable electronic filing of applications, reports, and SB 541 Page 2 fee payments, Dedicate staff to answering telephone calls, mailings, and electronic inquiries from carriers, Prioritize the timely processing of consumer complaints, Implement electronic case tracking of complaints and their disposition, Implement a process for appropriate and timely enforcement against illegally operating carriers, including by performing staff-driven investigations and performing enforcement through sting operations and other forms of presence in the field, Maintain relationships with, and implement outreach and education programs to local law enforcement, district attorneys, and airports, Meet with carrier trade associations at least annually, and Implement a consolidated case tracking system that integrates each of the transportation program core functions and data collection, administrative compliance details, complaints, and investigations. 1)Requires the CPUC to assess its capabilities to carry out the activities, specified in the goals, and report to the SB 541 Page 3 Legislature with an analysis of current capabilities and deficiencies, and recommendations to overcome any deficiencies identified by January 1, 2017. 2)Authorizes a peace officer, as defined, to enforce and assist in the enforcement of the transportation-related services, as specified, including to arrest violators and impound vehicles lacking proper certificates or permits. 3)Defines a "peace officer" to include local city or county police officers or sheriffs, California Highway Patrol (CHP) officers, or airport law enforcement officers. 4)Directs the CPUC to coordinate enforcement with peace officers, as defined, to including: Education outreach to ensure that those peace officers are aware of the transportation-related services, as specified, and Establishing lines of communications to ensure that the CPUC is notified if an action is commenced to enforce the requirements, as specified. 1)Authorizes the Attorney General, a district attorney, or a city attorney to prosecute actions or proceedings for the violation of any law committed in connection with a transaction involving the transportation of household goods and personal effects. EXISTING LAW: SB 541 Page 4 1)Authorizes the CPUC to regulate passenger stage corporations (PSC), through the issuance of a certificate, require insurance and workers compensation, and take appropriate enforcement actions and other provisions, as specified. (Public Utilities Code Sections 1031 to 1045) 2)Directs the CPUC to issue permits or certificates to CPCs, investigate complaints against carriers, cancel, revoke, or suspend permits and certificates for specific violations. (Public Utilities Code Section 5387) 3)Defines "charter party carriers of passengers" as every person engaged in the transportation of person by motor vehicle for compensation, whether in common or contract carriage, over any public highway in the state. (Public Utilities Code Section 5360) 4)Authorizes the CPUC to regulate private carriers of passengers, including requiring public liability and property insurance, cargo insurance, knowledge of rates, documentation, timely reporting of revenues and payment fees, and take appropriate enforcement actions and other provisions, as specified. (Public Utilities Code Sections 4000 to 4022) 5)Defines "private carrier" as not-for-hire motor carriers that transports passengers and is required to obtain a carrier identification number, as specified. (Public Utilities Code Section 4001) 6)Authorizes the CPUC to regulate household goods carriers, including requiring public liability and property insurance, cargo insurance, knowledge of rates, documentation, timely reporting of revenues and payment fees, and take appropriate enforcement actions and other provisions, as specified. (Public Utilities Code Sections 5101 to 5335) SB 541 Page 5 7)Defines "household goods carrier" as every corporation or person engaged in the transportation for compensation by means of a motor vehicle being used in the transportation of used household goods and personal effects over any public highway in the state. (Public Utilities Code Section 5109) 8)Authorizes a CHP officer to impound a CPC for 30 days if the officer determines that a violation occurred while the bus driver was operating CPC, as specified. (Vehicle Code Section 14602.9) FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this bill would have one-time contract costs in the mid-hundreds of thousands of dollars to develop an electronic permit program, a human resources plan, an enforcement strategy, and a monitoring protocol, as well as unknown ongoing cost pressures, likely in the millions of dollars, for a significant increase in positions for additional enforcement and permitting from the Public Utilities Transportation Reimbursement Account. COMMENTS: 1)Author's Statement: "In a 2014 report, the California State Auditor concluded that the CPUC Transportation Enforcement Branch does not provide sufficient oversight of [CPCs] and [PSCs] to ensure consumer safety ? In addition, many carriers experience long delays when they apply for carrier certificates and permits ? SB 541 improves the functions of the Transportation Enforcement Branch at the CPUC to improve customer service and enforcement against illegally operating [CPCs], [PSCs], and moving companies." SB 541 Page 6 2)Background: California law regulates different modes of passenger transportation for compensation, including taxi services, which are regulated by cities and/or counties, as well as CPCs and PSCs, which are regulated by the CPUC. The division within the CPUC responsible to ensure that services are delivered in a safe and reliable manner is the Safety and Enforcement Division. The division is responsible for safety oversight in specific industries, including electric, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure; railroads, rail crossings, and light rail transit system; passenger carriers, ferries; and household goods carriers. The Division is funded through a fee assesssed on various types of state-regulated vehicles, including passenger carriers. The CPUC collects these fees from operators and deposits them in the Transportation Reimbursement Account. The CPUC has set the fee for passenger carriers that seat no more than 15 persons at 1/3 of 1 percent of their annual gross revenue, plus a $10 quarterly fee or a $25 annual fee. The CPUC is allowed to maintain an appropriate reserve in the account based on past and projected operating experiences. 3)What are Passenger Stage Corporations? PSCs are services that provide transportation to the general public on an individual fare basis, such as scheduled bus operators, which are buses that operate on a fixed route and scheduled services, or airport shuttles, which operate on an on-call door-to-door share the ride service. 4)What are Charter-Party Carriers? CPCs are services that charter a vehicle, on a prearranged basis, for the exclusive use of an individual or group. Charges are based on the mileage or time of use, or a combination of both. The CPUC does not regulate the level of charges for CPCs. Types of CPCs include limos, tour buses, sightseeing services, and charter and party buses. SB 541 Page 7 The CPUC requires CPCs to meet a number of requirements until an operating permit or certificate is issued. These requirements include providing sufficient proof of financial responsibility, maintain a preventative maintenance program for all vehicles, possessing a safety education and training program, and regularly checking the driving records of all persons operating vehicles used in transportation for compensation. Taxis are excluded from the definition of CPCs and are regulated by cities or counties. 5)What are Private Carriers of Passengers and Household Good Carriers? Private carriers of passengers are not-for-hire motor carriers that do not receive any compensation for services and are required to obtain a carrier identification number. Examples of private carriers of passengers include vehicles used by employers to transport employees or vehicles used by an organization to transport members to and from a location. Household good carriers are often referred to as moving companies which transports used household goods and personal effects for residential moves. They may also conduct office moves if granted a permit by the CPUC. 6)State Auditor Report: In June 2014, the California State Auditor released a report examining the CPUC's Transportation Enforcement Branch, within the Safety and Enforcement Division, efforts to regulate passenger carriers, as well as its use of fees collected from carriers. The report found that the branch did not provide sufficient oversight of CPCs and PSCs to ensure consumer safety. Among the issues the SB 541 Page 8 Auditor's report cited included: The lack of procedures for processing complaints, Failure to ensure that it completes investigations and issues corresponding citations in a timely manner, Failure to conduct adequate investigations, Imposing penalties for consistently lower amounts than state law allows, Not consistently collecting money from passenger carriers related to citations, Not effectively overseeing accounting related to the branch, Not ensuring that passenger carrier fee payments are accurate, Not aligning revenues and expenditures associated with passenger carriers as state law requires, SB 541 Page 9 Incorrect funding of transportation enforcement positions due to the lack of managerial oversight, Incorrectly funding and using positions authorized in the state budget for enforcement of passenger carriers at airports, Not using the new positions for airport enforcement as the Legislature intended, Limited efforts to implement an airport enforcement program at other major airports, Inadequate enforcement across the state due to the lack of internal control and high turnover, Lack of leadership within the branch, High management turnover, Failure to ensure adequate training for staff, and SB 541 Page 10 The branch being unprepared to handle additional responsibilities. The report provided a series of recommendations to address the issues, which include: Developing policies and procedures for receiving complaints and investigating passenger carriers to ensure that all complaints are entered into the complaints database, Establish a method for prioritizing complaints and implementing a policy specifying the maximum amount of time between the receipt of a complaint and the completion of the subsequent investigation, Establishing standards specifying the type of evidence that it considers sufficient to determine whether a passenger carrier is operating illegally, Implement a policy that directs investigators to obtain sufficient evidence to justify determinations, and to verify carrier claims that they are no longer operating or are not operating illegally, Require investigators to review passenger carriers for compliance with each state law relating to passenger carrier requirements, Implement a formal training program to ensure that all investigators have adequate knowledge and skills related to SB 541 Page 11 regulating passenger carriers, Create a system to determine when a carrier merits a penalty, what the magnitude of the penalty should be, and ensure it is more consistent with what state law permits, Require staff to examine and formally report on the feasibility of impounding the vehicles of passenger carriers that refuse to comply with orders or pay citation penalties, and the feasibility of making use of the Tax Board's program to collect unpaid citation penalties, Require its fiscal staff to implement a process to verify passenger carrier fee payments and associated revenues, Implement a process to ensure that passenger carriers fee revenues more closely match related enforcement costs, Require the branch to review annually all branch staff funding distributions and align them with recent time changes, Use the five positions added for passenger carrier enforcement at airports as intended, and Produce a strategic plan to include goals for the program and strategies to achieve those goals, including strategies for staff development and training, and performance measures to assess goal achievements. This bill codifies these recommendations by requiring the CPUC to establish specific goals and assess its capabilities to achieve such goals, and report to the Legislature with an analysis of current capabilities and deficiencies, and recommendations to overcome any deficiencies identified by January 1, 2017. SB 541 Page 12 To improve enforcement of the branch, the bill authorizes peace officers, as defined, to help in the enforcement of transportation-related services, including arresting violators and impounding vehicles that lack proper certificates or permits. The CPUC would coordinate efforts with peace officers through educational outreach and establishing lines of communication. 1)What about Transportation Network Companies? The CPUC defines Transportation Network Companies (TNC), such as Uber, Lyft, and Sidecar, as an "organization, including, but not limited to, a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, sole proprietor, or any entity, operating in California that provides prearranged transportation services for compensation using an online-enabled application or platform to connect passengers with drivers using a personal vehicle." The CPUC believes that TNCS are currently providing passengers transportation for compensation, and reasonably concludes that TNCs are CPCs, therefore, falling under the CPUC's existing jurisdiction over these services. With the continued growth of TNCs, there have been a number of airports, including San Francisco International Airport, seeking to prohibit TNC drivers from picking up and dropping off passengers. This bill would authorize a peace officer, including airport law enforcement officers, to enforce CPUC regulations of transportation services, including services relating to TNCs. The CPUC requires a TNC to obtain an operating permit; however, there is no limit to the number of drivers a TNC can have under a permit. Individual TNC drivers do not have to obtain permits from the CPUC as long as they complete the TNCs process to be enrolled as a driver. Hence, airport law enforcement officers would only be enforcing CPUC regulations and impound vehicles if a driver was working for a TNC that did not have a valid permit, or the driver was operating a vehicle without a driver's license, as specified. SB 541 Page 13 However, this does not preclude the airport law enforcement officer from operating under its normal capacity of enforcing airport policies concerning TNCs and how the officer determines when a TNC driver is officially on duty or off. 2)Arguments in Support: According to the Greater California Livery Association, "California's charter-party carriers are assessed a fee based on their annual gross receipts to fund the Transportation Enforcement Branch responsibilities, those responsibilities have not been undertaken by the branch ? Greater California Livery Association members are being assessed millions of dollars each year to fund an organization that does not do its job. Senate Bill 541 fixes that. The pending 2015-16 California general fund budget demonstrates a dramatic, if not obscene, reserve in the CPUC Public Utilities Transportation Reimbursement Account; these funds must be utilized now to correct the deficiencies noted in the auditor's report and to truly enforce California's public transportation safety laws." 3)Double Referred: This bill is double referred to the Assembly Committee on Public Safety. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support Greater California Livery Association SB 541 Page 14 Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by:Edmond Cheung / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083