BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 542 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 542 (Mendoza) As Amended August 27, 2015 Majority vote SENATE VOTE: 37-0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+-----------------------+---------------------| |Insurance |13-0 |Daly, Beth Gaines, | | | | |Travis Allen, | | | | |Calderon, Cooley, | | | | |Cooper, Dababneh, | | | | |Frazier, Gatto, | | | | |Gonzalez, Grove, | | | | |Mayes, Rodriguez | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+-----------------------+---------------------| |Appropriations |17-0 |Gomez, Bigelow, Bloom, | | | | |Bonta, Calderon, | | | | |Chang, Daly, Eggman, | | | | |Gallagher, Eduardo | | | | |Garcia, Holden, Jones, | | | | |Quirk, Rendon, Wagner, | | | | |Weber, Wood | | | | | | | SB 542 Page 2 | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Makes a number of technical, clarifying, or noncontroversial changes to the workers' compensation laws. Specifically, this bill: 1)Clarifies the distinction between independent medical reviews that are conducted within a Medical Provider Network (MPN) and the recently adopted Independent Medical Review (IMR) program that provides review of utilization review (UR) decisions that delayed, denied, or modified recommended medical treatment. 2)Requires every MPN to post on its Internet Web site information about how to contact the network, its medical access assistants, and how to obtain a copy of information that the employee is entitled to receive. 3)Provides that an approval of a major modification of a MPN results in a new four-year approval of the MPN, but that an approval of minor modifications does not operate to grant an automatic extension of its four-year approval period. 4)Clarifies that an "off-the-shelf" MPN, and not the employer who contracts with that MPN, has the duty to provide specified disclosures to employees. 5) Authorizes the Division of Workers' Compensation (DWC) to use additional materials upon which to base a home healthcare fee schedule. 6)Clarifies and defines terms in the MPN law. SB 542 Page 3 7)Deletes a reference to the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine's practice guidelines, thereby eliminating that alternative means of selecting independent medical reviewers, and leaving the standards of the Labor Code to govern selections. EXISTING LAW: 1)Establishes an IMR system to resolve medical treatment or necessity disputes in the workers compensation system. 2)Authorizes employers to establish or contract with MPNs to provide medical services to employees injured on the job and uses the phrase "independent medical review" to describe what is essentially a second opinion procedure within the MPN. 3)Requires every MPN to have a "medical access assistant" to help injured employees navigate the MPN, assist in making appointments, and provide related services. 4)Provides that MPNs must obtain approval from the DWC before operating, and specifies the approval lasts for four years, unless material changes are made to the MPN. 5)Provides that if an MPN files and receives approval for material changes, the four-year approval period runs from the date of the approval of those changes. SB 542 Page 4 6)Requires either the MPN or the employer to provide employees with several notices either at the commencement of employment, or at the time of injury. 7)Requires the DWC to adopt a home health care services and fee schedule, and specifies that the In Home Support Services program shall be the model for adoption of that schedule. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, negligible state fiscal impact. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, this bill is intended to clarify and define a number of minor issues in the workers' compensation system, all of which are consensus proposals among workers' compensation stakeholders. The most substantive provision addresses the scope of the DWC's authority to adopt the home health care fee schedule, by authorizing reliance on the recommendation of a recent RAND report. 2) Home Health Care. One of the numerous issues delegated to the DWC in 2012 by SB 863 (De León), Chapter 363, Statutes of 2012, was the obligation to adopt a fee schedule for home health services. At that time, the DWC was directed to follow the approach used in the IHSS program. However, a subsequent RAND report recommended that other state and federal programs should be used as guidance to the DWC on this schedule, and this bill conforms the statute to the RAND recommendations. SB 542 Page 5 Analysis Prepared by: Mark Rakich / INS. / (916) 319-2086 FN: 0001545