BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 549|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 549
Author: Hall (D), et al.
Amended: 8/28/15
Vote: 27
SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE: 10-0, 4/14/15
AYES: Hall, Berryhill, Block, Gaines, Galgiani, Hernandez,
Hill, Lara, McGuire, Vidak
NO VOTE RECORDED: Hueso
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 5/28/15
AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen
SENATE FLOOR: 38-0, 6/3/15
AYES: Allen, Anderson, Bates, Beall, Berryhill, Block,
Cannella, De León, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Glazer, Hall,
Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Lara, Leno,
Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Moorlach,
Morrell, Nielsen, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Runner, Stone, Vidak,
Wieckowski, Wolk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Jackson, Nguyen
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 64-7, 9/2/15 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Charitable raffles
SOURCE: American Legion - Department of California
AMVETS Department of California
California Council of Chapters
California State Commanders Veterans Council
Jewish War Veterans Department of California
Military Officers Association of American
VFW - Department of California
Vietnam Veterans of America - California State Council
SB 549
Page 2
DIGEST: This bill authorizes an eligible organization, as
defined, to conduct a 50/50 raffle for the purpose of directly
supporting a specified beneficial or charitable purpose in
California, or financially supporting another private,
nonprofit, eligible organization.
Assembly Amendments decrease the sunset from five to three
years. In addition, the amendments require an eligible
organization, once registered, to annually file with the
Department of Justice (DOJ) a report that includes specified
information for each of the eligible organization's last three
fiscal years, and require the DOJ to make those reports
available online, as provided. Finally, the amendments require
the DOJ to adopt, on or before June 1, 2016, regulations to
enforce the provisions of this bill.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
1) Authorizes, under the California Constitution, to permit
private, nonprofit, eligible organizations to conduct raffles
as a funding mechanism to support beneficial and charitable
works if at least 90% of the gross receipts from the raffle
go directly to beneficial or charitable purposes in
California.
2) Prohibits any raffle to be conducted by means of, or
otherwise utilize any gaming machine, apparatus, or device,
whether or not that machine, apparatus, or device meets the
definition of a slot machine as currently defined in
California law.
3) Authorizes, under the California Constitution, for the
Legislature to amend the percentage of gross receipts
required to be dedicated to beneficial or charitable purposes
by a statute passed by a 2/3 vote of each house of the
Legislature.
This bill:
SB 549
Page 3
1) Authorizes an eligible organization, as defined, to conduct
a 50/50 raffle for the purpose of directly supporting
specified beneficial or charitable purposes in California, or
financially supporting another private, nonprofit, eligible
organization.
2) Defines an "eligible organization" as a private, nonprofit
organization established by, or affiliated with, a team from
the Major League Baseball, National Hockey League, National
Basketball Association, National Football League, Women's
National Basketball Association, or Major League Soccer; or a
private, nonprofit organization established by the
Professional Golfers' Association of America, Ladies
Professional Golf Association; or National Association for
Stock Car Auto Racing that has been qualified to conduct
business in California for at least one year prior to
conducting a raffle, is qualified for an exemption under
section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and is
exempt from taxation as specified.
3) Defines "raffle" as a scheme for the distribution of prizes
by chance among persons who have paid money for paper tickets
that provide the opportunity to win these prizes, as
specified.
4) Specifies that a beneficial purpose excludes purposes that
are intended to benefit officers, directors, or members and
specifies that funds raised by 50/50 raffles shall not be
used to fund any beneficial, charitable, or other purpose
outside of California. An eligible organization is allowed
to use funds from sources other than the sale of raffle
tickets to pay for the administration or other costs of
conducting a raffle.
5) Specifies that an employee of an eligible organization who
is a direct seller of raffle tickets shall not be treated as
an employee for purposes of workers' compensation if certain
specified conditions are satisfied.
6) Specifies that an employee selling raffle tickets shall be
deemed to be a direct seller, as described.
SB 549
Page 4
7) Specifies that a person who receives compensation in
connection with the operation of the raffle shall be an
employee of the eligible organization that is conducting the
raffle, and in no event may compensation be paid from
revenues required to be dedicated to beneficial or charitable
purposes.
8) Specifies that a raffle ticket shall not be sold in exchange
for Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency.
9) Specifies that a raffle otherwise permitted under this
section shall not be conducted by means of, or otherwise
utilize, any gaming machine that meets the definition of a
slot machine, as defined.
10)Specifies that a raffle otherwise permitted under this
section shall not be conducted, nor may tickets for a raffle
be sold, within an operating satellite wagering facility or
racetrack inclosure.
11)Specifies that a raffle shall not be operated or conducted
in any manner over the Internet, nor may raffle tickets be
sold, traded, or redeemed over the Internet. An eligible
organization shall not be deemed to operate or conduct a
raffle over the Internet, or sell raffle tickets over the
Internet, if the eligible organization advertises its raffle
on the Internet or permits others to do so.
12)Specifies that an individual, corporation, partnership, or
other legal entity shall not hold a financial interest in the
conduct of a raffle, except the eligible organization that is
itself authorized to conduct that raffle, and any private,
nonprofit, eligible organizations receiving financial support
from that charitable organization.
13)Prohibits an eligible organization from conducting more than
one raffle per home game.
14)Prohibits the sale of raffle tickets in any seating area
designated as a family section.
15)Requires the eligible organization to disclose to all ticket
SB 549
Page 5
purchasers the designated private, nonprofit, eligible
organization for which the raffle is being conducted.
16)Specifies that an eligible organization that conducts a
raffle to financially support another private, nonprofit
eligible organization shall distribute all proceeds not paid
out to the winners of the prizes to the private, nonprofit
organization within 15 days of conducting the raffle.
17)Specifies that any raffle prize remaining unclaimed by a
winner at the end of the season for a team with an affiliated
eligible organization that conducted a raffle to financially
support another private, nonprofit eligible organization
shall be donated within 30 days from the end of the season by
the eligible organization to the designated private,
nonprofit organization for which the raffle was conducted.
18)Provides that an eligible organization shall not conduct a
raffle unless it has a valid registration issued by DOJ. The
DOJ shall furnish a registration form via the Internet or
upon request to eligible nonprofit organizations. The DOJ
shall, by regulation, collect only the information necessary
to carry out the provisions of this bill.
19)Specifies that DOJ may require an eligible organization to
pay a minimum annual registration fee of $5,000 to cover the
reasonable costs of DOJ to administer and enforce the
provisions of this bill.
20)Specifies that an eligible organization shall pay, in
addition to the annual registration fee, $100 for every
individual raffle conducted at an eligible location to cover
the reasonable costs of DOJ to administer and enforce the
provisions of this bill. This fee shall be submitted in
conjunction with the annual registration form.
21)Specifies that a manufacturer or distributor of
raffle-related products or services shall not conduct
business with an eligible organization for purposes of
conducting a raffle unless the manufacturer or distributor
has a valid annual registration issued by DOJ.
SB 549
Page 6
22)Specifies that DOJ may require a manufacturer or distributor
of raffle-related products or services to pay a minimum
annual registration fee of $5,000 to cover the reasonable
costs of DOJ to administer and enforce the provisions of this
bill.
23)Requires an eligible organization to register the equipment
used in the sale and distribution of raffle tickets, and
shall have the equipment tested by an independent gaming
tested lab.
24)Requires a person affiliated with an eligible organization
who conducts the manual draw to annually register with DOJ.
25)Specifies that DOJ may require a person affiliated with an
eligible organization who conducts the manual draw to pay a
minimum annual registration fee of $10 to cover the
reasonable costs of DOJ to administer and enforce the
provisions of this bill.
26)Specifies that DOJ may, by regulation, adjust the annual
registration fees as needed to ensure that revenues will
fully offset, but not exceed, the reasonable costs incurred
by DOJ pursuant to the provisions of this bill. The fees
shall be deposited by DOJ into the General Fund.
27)Specifies that DOJ shall receive the moneys for the costs
incurred by the provisions of this bill by an appropriation
by the Legislature.
28)Specifies that DOJ shall adopt, on or before June 1, 2016,
regulations necessary to effectuate the provisions of this
bill, including emergency regulations.
29)Requires DOJ to maintain an automated database of all
registrants. Each local law enforcement agency shall notify
DOJ of any arrests or investigation that may result in an
administrative or criminal action against a registrant. DOJ
may audit the records and other documents of a registrant to
ensure compliance with the provisions of this bill and may
charge a registrant the direct costs associated with an
audit.
SB 549
Page 7
30)Specifies that DOJ may investigate all suspected violations
or any activity that the registrant has engaged in that is
not in the best interests of the public's health, safety, or
general welfare as it pertains to charitable raffles.
31)Requires an eligible organization, once registered, to
annually file with the DOJ a report that includes specified
information for each of the eligible organization's last
three fiscal years and requires the DOJ to make those reports
available online, as provided. Failure to submit the annual
report to DOJ shall be grounds for denial of an annual
registration.
32)Requires DOJ to annually furnish to registrants a form to
collect this information.
33)Specifies that DOJ may take legal action against a
registrant if it determines that the registrant has violated
provisions of this bill or a regulation adopted, or that the
registrant has engaged in any conduct that is not in the best
interests of the public's health, safety, or general welfare.
An action taken by DOJ does not prohibit the commencement of
an administrative or criminal action by the Attorney General,
or district attorney, city attorney, or county counsel.
34)Specifies that an action and hearing conducted to deny,
revoke, or suspend a registry, or other administrative action
taken against a registrant shall be conducted pursuant to the
Administrative Procedure Act. The DOJ may seek civil
remedies, including imposing fines and may seek recovery of
the costs incurred in investigating or prosecuting an action
against a registrant or applicant.
35)Specifies that the provisions of this bill shall remain in
effect only until December 31, 2018, and as of that date is
repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted
before December 31, 2018, deletes or extends that date.
Background
Purpose of the bill: According to the author, across the United
SB 549
Page 8
States more than 100 professional sports franchises are
successfully operating 50/50 charitable raffles at sporting
events in order to maximize donations to local charities. These
types of charitable raffles are raffles in which 50% of the
proceeds go to the winner, and 50% of the proceeds go to the
local charities designated by the professional sports team for
that particular event. According to the author the results of
50/50 charitable raffles in other states have been stellar, and
are now being held in more than 29 states and 10 Canadian
provinces. This bill provides an opportunity for fans who
attend professional sporting events to voluntarily participate
in a raffle directly benefiting charities in their local
communities.
History: Charitable raffles have been legal in the State of
California since July 1, 2001, with the successful passage of SB
639 (McPherson, Chapter 778) in the 1999-2000 legislative
session and voter approval of Proposition 17.
Despite their previous illegality, raffles had long been a
popular fundraising tool used by various nonprofit
organizations. Thus in 2000, local law enforcement authorities
and members of the nonprofit community decided to sponsor
legislation to legalize some raffles and bring the then illegal
raffles out of the shadows and provide for regulation to these
types of raffles.
Because a constitutional amendment was needed, Proposition 17 in
2000 was approved by California voters with 59% of the vote to
exempt charitable raffles from the prohibition against lotteries
provided that the Legislature established reasonable statutory
regulations and that 90% of the gross receipts from raffles go
directly to beneficial or charitable purposes.
Proposition 17 also authorized the Legislature to change the
percentages of gross receipts that must go directly to
charitable purposes with a two-thirds vote of the Legislature
and approval by the Governor.
Prior/Related Legislation
AB 1691 (Jones-Sawyer, 2014) would have authorized an eligible
SB 549
Page 9
organization to conduct a 50/50 raffle for the purpose of
directly supporting specified beneficial or charitable purposes
in California, or financially supporting another private,
nonprofit, eligible organization. (Held in Assembly
Appropriations Committee)
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.:YesLocal: No
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, ongoing
General Fund costs to the DOJ's Bureau of Gambling Control for
administration and enforcement of approximately $575,000 per
year. Over time, those costs may be recovered, in whole or in
part, through annual and per-raffle registration fees.
SUPPORT: (Verified9/2/15)
American Legion - Department of California (co-source)
AMVETS - Department of California (co-source)
California Council of Chapters (co-source)
California State Commanders Veterans Council (co-source)
Jewish War Veterans Department of California (co-source)
Military Officers Association of American (co-source)
VFW - Department of California (co-source)
Vietnam Veterans of America - California State Council
(co-source)
AEG
Anaheim Ducks Foundation
Anaheim Ducks Hockey Club
Anaheim Ducks Learn to Play
Anaheim Ducks S.C.O.R.E.
Angels Baseball Foundation
Auto Club Speedway
CHOC Children's Hospital
CHOC at Mission
Children's Law Center of California
City Year Los Angeles
Clippers Foundation
SB 549
Page 10
College Tract
Donor Network West
Giants Community Fund
Girls Incorporated of Orange County
Impact Foundation
Junior Blind
Kings Care Foundation
LA Clippers
LA Galaxy
LA Galaxy Foundation
LA Kings
LEAP
Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
Los Angeles Boys and Girls Club
Los Angeles Dodgers
Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation
Los Angeles Fund for Public Education
Michael Ottolini AMVETS Post 40 Sonoma County
Military Officers Association of America, Alta Chapter
Military Officers Association of America, Solano County Chapter
Orangewood Children's Foundation
Orthopaedic Institute for Children
The Pacific Club IMPACT Foundation
Padres Foundation
P.F. Breese Foundation
Rancho Cordova Police Activities League
Sacramento Kings
Sacramento Kings Foundation
Sacramento Republic Football Club
San Diego Padres
San Francisco Giants
San Francisco Giants Community Fund
San Jose Sharks
San Jose Sharks Foundation
Spark Los Angeles
South County Outreach
Teach for America - Los Angeles
United Way California Capital Region
University of Southern California
Veterans of Foreign Wars of California 1st District
Veterans of Foreign Wars, Department of California
Veterans of Foreign War Post 2275
SB 549
Page 11
Veteran Tickets Foundation
VFW Post 3787, Mission Valley San Diego
VFW Post 5431
Vietnam Veterans of America, Chapter #223
Vision to Learn
Weave, Inc.
OPPOSITION: (Verified9/2/15)
California Coalition Against Gambling Expansion
California Society of Association Executives
California Tribal Business Alliance
CalNonprofits
Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake
Lytton Rancheria of California
Pala Band of Mission Indians
Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to supporters of this bill,
currently more than 100 professional sports franchises operate
50/50 charitable raffles at sporting events in order to maximize
donations to community philanthropic causes. Supporters argue
that the results have been overwhelmingly successful for teams,
fans and charities alike. Using cutting-edge, transparent and
secure in-game technologies, sports franchises across the
country have documented a significant and immediate increase in
philanthropic contributions to charitable foundations.
Supporters argue that due to a restriction in law passed before
these technologies existed, California teams face an uneven
playing field when it comes to charitable raffles.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: According to CalNonprofits, SB 549
creates a carve-out with special rules for an exclusive set of
nonprofit organizations affiliated with major league sports
teams while all other charities, such as school bands, churches,
and garden clubs, would be limited to the current 90/10 rule.
CalNonprofits further argues that current law ensures that the
SB 549
Page 12
primary purpose of any charitable raffle is to benefit a charity
and that raffles with the 50/50 split move away from that
intent, and may inadvertently put more focus on gambling to win
a cash prize.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 64-7, 9/2/15
AYES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla,
Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chávez, Chiu,
Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Beth
Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson,
Gomez, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Irwin, Jones,
Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Mathis, Mayes,
McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Obernolte, O'Donnell,
Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez,
Salas, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Wagner, Waldron,
Weber, Wilk, Wood, Atkins
NOES: Gatto, Gonzalez, Gordon, Lackey, Maienschein, Ting,
Williams
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, Brough, Chau, Frazier, Harper, Holden,
Nazarian, Rendon, Santiago
Prepared by:Felipe Lopez / G.O. / (916) 651-1530
9/15/15 9:13:49
**** END ****