BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 555 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 19, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair SB 555 (Wolk) - As Amended August 17, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Water, Parks and Wildlife |Vote:|10 - 3 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill requires urban water suppliers to submit annual water loss audit reports to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) beginning in 2017. This bill requires DWR and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to adopt rules related to the SB 555 Page 2 water loss audits and to establish water loss performance standards as specified. Additionally, this bill requires SWRCB to contribute up to $400,000 towards the initial costs for validating water loss audit reports using funds available for the 2016-17 year. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)One-time GF costs of approximately $150,000 for DWR to develop the rules for standardizing and validating water loss audit reports and auditors. 2)Annual GF costs of approximately $150,000 for DWR to review urban water supplier audit reports and post the reports on its internet website. 3)Increased annual GF costs shifts of between $150,000 and $200,000 to provide technical assistance to urban water suppliers on water loss detection programs. This bill requires DWR to provide technical assistance with existing resources. However, DWR indicates this cost is not absorbable and would require reductions in existing programs. 4)Absorbable one-time costs for SWRCB to consult with DWR to develop water loss metrics and performance standards. The 2015-16 Budget Act provides $833,000 (special fund) and 2 positions to SWRCB for water conservation activities that are available fulfill these requirements. SB 555 Page 3 5)Absorbable one-time costs to SWRCB of up to $400,000 (Drinking Water State Revolving Fund) for its contribution towards procuring water loss audit report validation assistance for urban water suppliers. It is presumed the urban water suppliers will be responsible for their validation costs after the first year. The author may wish to clarify that the urban water supplier is responsible for its ongoing validations costs after the 2016-17 year. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, California's water supply is under intense pressure from climate change, increasing population, and aging infrastructure. The financial demands from communities around the state for additional water and wastewater currently exceed the available state and federal resources. The author states that despite the availability of free audit software and the establishment of a Best Management Practice (BMP) for water loss by the California Urban Water Conservation Council, urban water suppliers have been slow to realize the full potential of water loss control. This bill will increase water use efficiency by requiring water suppliers to document and control system water losses through annual audit reports to DWR. SB 555 Page 4 2)Background. The Urban Water Management Planning Act requires all urban water suppliers to prepare and adopt an urban water management plan. In order for an urban water supplier to be eligible for a water management grant or loan from the state, it must implement the water demand management measures in its urban water management plan. Last year, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed SB 1420 (Wolk), which requires the urban water management plan to include a calculation of the distribution system water losses. The loss calculations are to be based on the water system balance methodology developed by the American Water Works Association (AWWA). Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916) 319-2081