BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 575


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          575 (Liu)


          As Amended  July 13, 2015


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  36-0


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Insurance       |13-0 |Daly, Beth Gaines,    |                    |
          |                |     |Travis Allen,         |                    |
          |                |     |Calderon, Cooley,     |                    |
          |                |     |Cooper, Dababneh,     |                    |
          |                |     |Frazier, Gatto,       |                    |
          |                |     |Gonzalez, Grove,      |                    |
          |                |     |Mayes, Rodriguez      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Aging           |7-0  |Brown, Hadley,        |                    |
          |                |     |Gipson, Gray, Levine, |                    |
          |                |     |Lopez, Mathis         |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 










                                                                     SB 575


                                                                    Page  2





          SUMMARY:  Requires insurers to provide notice to holders of  
          long-term care (LTC) insurance, and their designees, if  
          contingent benefits or nonforfeiture benefits are triggered.   
          Specifically, this bill:  


          1)Requires insurers to notify LTC policyholders when a  
            contingent benefit on lapse or a non-forfeiture benefit is  
            triggered, and annually thereafter, that the benefit is  
            available, including the dollar value of the benefit.


          2)Requires the notice to provide the insured with the  
            opportunity to designate another person to receive a copy of  
            the notice.  


          3)Requires the notice to include contact information for the  
            insurer.


          EXISTING LAW:   


          1)Requires insurers to offer applicants for LTC insurance the  
            option to purchase a nonforfeiture benefit that would provide  
            a fixed benefit equal to the greater of the amount of premium  
            paid or three months of care at a nursing facility should the  
            policy lapse. 


          2)Requires insurers to offer applicants the opportunity to  
            designate at least one individual in addition to the applicant  
            to receive notice of lapse or termination of a policy for  
            nonpayment of premium and requires insurers to receive from  
            each applicant either: 


             a)   A written designation of at least one third-party  








                                                                     SB 575


                                                                    Page  3





               recipient, in addition to the applicant, who is to receive  
               notice of lapse or termination for nonpayment of premium;  
               or 


             b)   A waiver signed and dated by the applicant notifying the  
               insurer that the policyholder elects not to make a  
               designation. 


          3)Requires insurers to notify policyholders of the right to add  
            or change a designation at least every two years.


          4)Requires approval by the Insurance Commissioner (commissioner)  
            of any rate or rate adjustment applied to LTC policies before  
            a policy may be offered, sold, issued, or delivered to a  
            resident of this state.


          5)Permits the commissioner to require an insurer, as a condition  
            of approval of a rate adjustment that exceeds a specified  
            threshold, to administer a contingent benefit upon lapse that  
            would provide the insured a minimum lifetime benefit that is  
            at least the equivalent value of the greater of the amount of  
            premiums paid or 30 times the daily nursing home benefit at  
            the time of lapse.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  Undetermined.  This bill is keyed non-fiscal by  
          the Legislative Counsel.


          COMMENTS:  


          1)Purpose.  According to the author, existing law gives eligible  
            long-term care policyholders facing large rate hikes they  
            could not afford the right to stop paying premiums and bank a  








                                                                     SB 575


                                                                    Page  4





            benefit amount for potential later use in the amount of  
            premiums they had already paid.  Individuals who lapse their  
            LTC insurance policies and "bank" contingent benefits do not  
            receive periodic notification from the insurer that these  
            benefits are available.  Without notification, these  
            individuals and their families can easily lose track of the  
            existence of the benefits, especially if the insured suffers  
            from cognitive impairment.  These individuals and families  
            likely end up paying for care or doing without when, in fact,  
            benefits are available.  


          2)Long Term Care.  LTC services provide individuals who, because  
            of illness or disability, are generally unable to perform  
            activities of daily living, such as bathing, dressing,  
            toileting, and getting around the house, or suffer from  
            cognitive impairments.  LTC services are provided in a variety  
            of settings, such as nursing homes, assisted living  
            facilities, and private residences.  Only about 20% of the  
            elderly who need LTC services live in an institutional  
            setting.  The roughly 80% living in the community primarily  
            live in private homes, but a small number live in residential  
            communities catering to the needs of elderly people.  For  
            those living at home, most receive assistance from unpaid  
            family members and friends (referred to as informal care)  
            while some pay for assistance (referred to as formal care)  
            from home health aides.  Elderly people with severe functional  
            and cognitive limitations who require around-the clock  
            assistance often live in institutional settings.  According to  
            data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, the elderly  
            nursing home population has declined over the past 10 years as  
            more elderly people are living in residential care facilities,  
            community-based housing with supportive services, and in their  
            homes.  


          3)Notices and Forms.  California law provides procedural  
            measures designed to help consumers avoid unintentional lapse  
            due to nonpayment of premium.  Insurers are required to notify  








                                                                     SB 575


                                                                    Page  5





            the policyholder that he or she has the right to designate a  
            third-party that will also receive a notice if the policy is  
            about to terminate due to missed premium payments ("notice of  
            lapse").  Prior to issuing or delivering a policy, an insurer  
            must provide and collect from the policyholder either a  
            designation of third-party recipient or a waiver.  The insurer  
            must also send a biennial reminder that the policyholder has  
            the right to change the designee.


          4)Contingent Benefit on Lapse.  A consumer protection provided  
            for LTC policies is the contingent benefit on lapse.  The  
            benefit provides minimum coverage for some policyholders who  
            did not purchase a nonforfeiture benefit and are forced to  
            lapse their policies because of substantial rate increases.   
            If over the life of a policy, the insurer increases premiums  
            beyond a specified threshold, the commissioner may require the  
            insurer to offer the policyholder a contingent benefit, along  
            with other options (such as a shorter coverage period), that  
            the policyholder may elect instead of a rate increase.  The  
            policyholder may elect the contingent benefit or will be  
            deemed to have elected the contingent benefit if the policy  
            lapses within 120 days of the due date of the increased  
            premium.  The thresholds are based on the age of the  
            policyholder and the premium at the time the policy was  
            issued.  The threshold required to trigger this benefit falls  
            as the insured ages.  When a contingent benefit is triggered,  
            no more premium payments are due and the policy provides a  
            benefit equal to the greater of all premiums paid or 30 times  
            the daily nursing home benefit amount.  The benefit may be  
            used for care and services as provided under the terms of the  
            policy.


          5)Problems With LTC Insurance.  The long-term care insurance  
            marketplace is problematic for both insurers and consumers.   
            Many insurers have stopped selling new LTC policies.  Insurers  
            have struggled with setting premiums adequate to cover their  
            costs in the absence of sufficient claims data.  LTC insurance  








                                                                     SB 575


                                                                    Page  6





            is a relatively new product that requires years of paying  
            premiums before claims are made.  Only in recent years have  
            the insurers begun to receive claims for many of the policies  
            sold early on, and those claims have been much higher than the  
            insurers anticipated.  In addition to misjudging the cost of  
            claims, insurers have struggled with anticipating policy lapse  
            rates, LTC inflation, and life span increases.  All of those  
            factors, and others, have led to LTC insurance being much more  
            expensive than previously expected.  The early mistakes in  
            pricing LTC policies has led to rounds of major premium  
            increases which adds marketing challenges to a product that is  
            already, according to insurance agents, difficult to sell.   
            Unlike some life insurance policies, LTC policies have no  
            independent value.  If the policy lapses, the owner will  
            likely lose all benefits unless the owner purchased an  
            optional nonforfeiture benefit that allows the insured to keep  
            a limited benefit based on the premiums already paid.  


            CalPERS is a recent example of an LTC insurer that  
            underestimated the cost of insuring LTC.  It has pushed  
            through multiple premium increases (30% in 2003, 43.8% in  
            2007, and 85% in 2015) in an attempt to set premiums in line  
            with its costs.  While premium increases of this size are  
            difficult to absorb for those who are still working, it can be  
            impossible for retirees on a fixed income to absorb the higher  
            premiums.  Genworth is the largest issuer of private LTC  
            insurance and it has suffered massive financial losses on the  
            product in the past year.  It has added nearly $1 billion to  
            the loss reserves for its LTC policies and has had its bonds  
            reduced to junk status by multiple rating agencies.  These  
            losses are occurring despite Genworth having significantly  
            increased the premiums charged for its existing policies.   
            Losses in LTC insurance previously caused both MetLife and  
            Prudential to exit the market.  












                                                                     SB 575


                                                                    Page  7





          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
          Paul Riches / INS. / (916) 319-2086  FN: 0001231