BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 588 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 588 (De León) As Amended September 1, 2015 Majority vote SENATE VOTE: 26-13 ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Labor |5-2 |Roger Hernández, Chu, |Harper, Patterson | | | |Low, McCarty, | | | | |Thurmond | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Judiciary |7-3 |Mark Stone, Weber, |Wagner, Gallagher, | | | |Alejo, Chau, Chiu, |Maienschein | | | |Cristina Garcia, | | | | |Thurmond | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |12-5 |Gomez, Bloom, Bonta, |Bigelow, Chang, | | | |Calderon, Nazarian, |Gallagher, Jones, | | | |Eggman, Eduardo |Wagner | | | |Garcia, Holden, | | | | |Quirk, Rendon, Weber, | | | | |Wood | | SB 588 Page 2 | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY: Authorizes the Labor Commissioner to file a lien or levy on an employer's property in order to assist an employee in collecting unpaid wages where there is a judgment against the employer, and contains related provisions. Specifically, this bill: 1)Allows the Labor Commissioner, beginning 20 days after a judgment is entered by a court of competent jurisdiction in favor of the Labor Commissioner or in favor of any employee, to collect any outstanding amount of the judgment by mailing a notice of levy upon all persons having in their possession, or who will have in their possession or under their control, any credits, money, or property belonging to the judgment debtor, or who owe any debt to the judgment debtor at the time they receive the notice of levy. This can only be done with the consent of the aggrieved worker. 2)Provides that, any person, upon whom a levy has been noticed for either possessing or owing credits, money, or property belonging to the judgment, shall surrender the credits, money, or property to the commissioner or pay to the commissioner the amount of any debt owing the judgment debtor within ten days of service of the levy. This includes property, money or credits coming into the person's possession within one year of receipt of the notice of levy. 3)Provides that any person who complies with the notice of Levy from the Labor Commissioner shall be discharged from any obligation or liability to the judgment debtor to the extent of the amount paid to the commissioner. 4)Provides that any person who fails or refuses to surrender any SB 588 Page 3 credits, money, or property or pay any debts owing to the judgment debtor shall be liable in his or her own person or estate to the commissioner in an amount equal to the levy. 5)Provides a process for filing a levy with a bank or other financial institution, as defined under federal law. 6)Limits the above-discussed provisions to property that is not real property. 7)Requires that, if a final judgment against an employer arising from the employer's nonpayment of wages for work performed in this state remains unsatisfied after a period of 30 days after the time to appeal therefrom has expired, the employer must cease business operations, including conducting business using labor of another business or contractor unless the employer has obtained a surety bond. The principal sum of the bond shall not be less than: a) $50,000 if the unsatisfied portion of the judgment is no more than $5,000. b) $100,000 if the unsatisfied portion of the judgment is more than $5,000 and no more than $10,000. c) $150,000 if the unsatisfied portion of the judgment is more than $10,000. 8)Allows the employer to provide the Labor Commissioner with a notarized copy of an accord reached with an individual holding an unsatisfied final judgment instead of filing a surety bond described above. However, if the accord provides for the judgment to be paid in installments, and an installment payment is not made, the employer is no longer excused from SB 588 Page 4 satisfying the bond requirements. 9)Provides that a subsequent employer similar in operation and ownership to an employer with an unsatisfied final judgment for unpaid wages shall be deemed the same employer for purposes of this section if: 10)The employees of the subsequent employer are engaged in substantially the same work in substantially the same working conditions under substantially the same supervisors; or 11)If the new entity has substantially the same production process or operations, produces substantially the same products or offers substantially the same services, and has substantially the same body of customers. 12)Requires that any employer, or other person acting on behalf of an employer, that conducts business in violation of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $2,500 and that any employer that has previously paid a fine pursuant to this section shall be subject to an additional fine of $100 for each calendar day that the employer conducts business in violation of this section, capped at $100,000. The civil penalty may be assessed by the Labor Commissioner, but shall not be assessed against an entity determined to be a successor employer within the first 30 days after the notice of judgment. 13)Exempts employers from the requirements of the bond if they employ workers who are covered by a bona fide collective bargaining agreement that expressly provides for wages, hours of work, working conditions, includes a process to resolve disputes concerning nonpayment of wages, and contains a waiver of the bond. SB 588 Page 5 14)Provides notice requirements to the Labor Commissioner in the event of the surety bond being cancelled or terminated. 15)Provides the following in the event of an employer failing to comply with the bond provisions listed above: a) A stop order prohibiting the use of employee labor by that employer or use of subcontracted labor until the employer complies with bonding requirements. The stop order must become effective immediately, and the employer must pay any worker for their lost time due to the stop order, not exceeding ten days. b) A lien on the real property and personal property of an employer that for the full amount of any wages, interest, penalties, and attorney's fees (to the extent specifically allowed to be recovered under existing law) claimed to be owed to any employee. This lien would be filed by the Labor Commissioner. Unless the lien is satisfied or released, the lien must continue until ten years from the date of its creation. 16)Creates notice and filing requirements for the lien provisions discussed above. 17)Prohibits the State Department of Public Health or the State Department of Social Services from allowing a long-term care industry employer from obtaining or renewing a license if the employer is conducting business in violation of the surety bond requirement. This bill defines a long-term care industry as a skilled nursing facility, intermediate care facility, congregate living facility, hospice facility, adult residential facility, residential care facility for persons with chronic life-threatening illness, residential care facility for the elderly, continuing care retirement community, home health agency, or home care organization. SB 588 Page 6 18)Provides that any individual or business entity that, as part of its business, contracts for services in the property services or long-term care industries shall be jointly and severally liable for any unpaid wages, as provided, to the extent the amounts are for services performed under the contract. The issue of joint and several liability shall be determined in specified administrative or court proceedings before or by the Labor Commissioner, but no action shall be brought under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004. 19)Creates a notice requirement for an employer that contracts to provide services in the property services or long-term care industries regarding unsatisfied judgments, but also states that the failure by the employer to provide this notice shall not be a defense to the joint and several liabilities as described above. 20)Provides that this bill shall not be interpreted to impose joint liability on an individual, or the owner of a home-based business, for any property services, to the extent that such property services are provided at the individual or home-based business owner's primary residence, provided that the primary residence does not have multiple business units. 21)Allows for the Labor Commissioner provide for a hearing to recover civil penalties against an employer or other person acting on behalf of any employers, for specified violations. 22)Provides that any employer, or other person acting on behalf of an employer, that violates or causes to be violated, any provision of law regulating minimum wages or hours and days of work, as specified, may be held liable as the employer for such a violation. SB 588 Page 7 23)Defines "other person acting on behalf of an employer" to be limited to a natural person who is an owner, director, officer or managing agent of the employer. 24)Provides that nothing in the foregoing provision shall be construed to limit the definition of "employer" (including natural persons) under existing law. 25)Creates enforcement provisions for liens and levies discussed above within the Code of Civil Procedure. These provisions would bestow jurisdiction on the superior court and detail the service and hearing requirements for levies and liens filed by the Labor Commissioner. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, this bill would result in initial administrative costs of approximately $2.6 million [Labor Enforcement and Compliance Fund (LECF)] and ongoing costs of approximately $2.2 million (LECF) for the Department of Industrial Relations to implement the provisions of this bill. COMMENTS: Supporters argue that wage theft is a significant problem in California, with Los Angeles County's wage theft resulting in over $1 billion unlawfully failing to reach the workers who desperately need it. Supporters also note that current wage theft collection rates are less than 20%, meaning the vast majority of scofflaw employers are successful in robbing their workers of their lawful wages. Supporters believe that this bill will help combat the high rate of wage theft in California by creating a simple lien process for the Labor Commissioner to use against employers who rob workers of their wages. Supporters, noting Wisconsin's success, argue that wage liens are simple, effective, and a time tested approach to halting wage theft. SB 588 Page 8 This bill is co-sponsored by the Service Employees International Union, the Koreatown Immigrant Workers Alliance, and the Wage Justice Center. They write: [This bill] gives the Labor Commissioner additional tools to collect from employers who have exhausted all appeals for their non-payment of wages and have final judgments owed. It requires a business that has an outstanding unpaid judgment against them to purchase a wage bond of $150,000. If it fails to do that, the employer can be subject to a stop work order and a lien at the Labor Commissioner's discretion. This bill also gives the Labor Commissioner the authority to hold individual business owners accountable for their debts to workers. This will discourage business owners from rolling up their operations and walking away from their debts to workers and starting a new company. In addition, [this bill] targets two high-risk sectors - property services and long-term care - by establishing procedures to ensure parties are held individually responsible to ensure that employers can't evade the law through contracting and subcontracting arrangements. There is no opposition on file. SB 588 Page 9 Analysis Prepared by: Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091 FN: 0001688