BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 594| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 594 Author: Wieckowski (D) Amended: 6/11/15 Vote: 21 SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 7-0, 5/5/15 AYES: Jackson, Moorlach, Anderson, Hertzberg, Leno, Monning, Wieckowski SENATE FLOOR: 36-0, 5/18/15 AYES: Allen, Anderson, Bates, Beall, Block, Cannella, De León, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Moorlach, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Pan, Roth, Runner, Stone, Vidak, Wieckowski, Wolk NO VOTE RECORDED: Berryhill, Hall, Pavley ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 6/29/15 (Consent) - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Child custody SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill specifies that a child custody evaluation, investigation, or assessment, and any resulting report, may only be considered by the court if the evaluation, investigation, or assessment, and any resulting report, is conducted in accordance with the minimum requirements. Assembly Amendments make clarifying changes. ANALYSIS: SB 594 Page 2 Existing law: 1)Provides that the health, safety, and welfare of children is the court's primary concern when determining the best interests of a child for custody and visitation orders. (Fam. Code Sec. 3020.) 2)Authorizes the court, in a contested child custody or visitation proceeding to appoint an evaluator to conduct a child custody evaluation, from whom the court may require a written, confidential report on the evaluation that is filed with the clerk and served on the parties or their counsel and any minor's counsel. (Fam. Code Sec. 3111.) 3)Requires that the confidential child custody report only be made available to the parties or their counsel, any minor's counsel, a court, child protective services, a probation officer, or a guardianship investigator. (Fam. Code Sec. 3111.) 4)Provides that the confidential child custody report may not be disclosed except to specified persons. (Fam. Code Sec. 3025.5.) 5)Establishes qualifications for child custody evaluators and requires initial and continuing domestic violence training for child custody mediators, investigators, and evaluators. (Fam. Code Secs. 1816, 3110.5, 3117.) 6)Requires that local rules include a complaint procedure for mediators and evaluators. (Cal. Rules of Ct., Rules 5.210, 5.220.) This bill: 1)Provides that a child custody evaluation, investigation, or assessment, and any resulting report, may be considered by the court only if it is conducted in accordance with the requirements set forth in the standards adopted by the Judicial Council pursuant to Family Code Section 3117. 2)Provides that the above provision does not preclude the SB 594 Page 3 consideration of a child custody evaluation report that contains nonsubstantive or inconsequential errors or both. Background In a contested child custody or visitation proceeding, the court may appoint a child custody evaluator to conduct a child custody evaluation if the court determines it is in the best interests of the child. Evaluations contain highly personal, sensitive, and confidential information. In most cases, an evaluation will consist of several interviews and may include psychological testing. Interviews are conducted with all adults involved with the child, including parents, stepparents, and sometimes other relatives who have a significant role in the child's life. Psychological testing provides an additional source of information that cannot be obtained through interviews alone. The testing may further demonstrate the family dynamics and expose any potential mental health or parenting problems. These reports can take six to nine months to complete and are generally paid for by the parties. Although the evaluation may be delegated to a number of different types of experts, impartial objectivity is a non-negotiable requirement and courts are required to make an inquiry if the facts reveal that an evaluator may be biased against one party. (See Marriage of Adams & Jack A. (2012) 209 Cal. 4th 1543, 1563.) In addition, because custody evaluators are not judicial officers, they cannot make binding factual determinations or decisions on a custody or visitation issue. At best, the evaluator's report is probative of relevant facts the court must consider and weigh along with all other evidence in the case. However, recognizing that evaluations are generally given great weight by the judge in deciding custody and visitation issues, the Judicial Council has adopted Rules of Court establishing uniform standards of practice for court-ordered custody evaluations. Additional standards regarding evaluator qualifications and testimony are prescribed by statute. (See Fam. Code Secs. 3110.5, 3115.) This bill seeks to ensure that evaluator reports are complete by prohibiting the court from considering a report that does not comply with minimum requirements under the law. SB 594 Page 4 FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:NoLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified6/30/15) California Partnership to End Domestic Violence California Protective Parents Association Center for Judicial Excellence Child Abuse Prevention Center Coalition of California Welfare Rights Organizations Crime Victims United of California Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project Family Violence and Sexual Assault Institute Incest Survivors' Speakers Bureau of California Justice for Children Legislative Coalition to Prevent Child Abuse Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office Service Employees International Union OPPOSITION: (Verified6/30/15) None Received ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office writes in support of this bill: There has been compelling testimony that children may have been placed with abusive parents as a result of shoddy custody evaluation reports. This is of particular concern in cases of suspected incest. SB 594 would provide that the reports can only be used where minimum requirements set by Judicial Council are met. The consequences of child abuse and child sexual abuse have been well documented. The resultant trauma can affect a SB 594 Page 5 child for the remainder of his or her life and often impacts future generations. It is essential that child custody evaluations follow minimum standards. ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 6/29/15 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins NO VOTE RECORDED: Brown, Low, O'Donnell, Perea Prepared by:Nichole Rapier / JUD. / (916) 651-4113 6/30/15 14:57:39 **** END ****