BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 597|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                      CONSENT 


          Bill No:  SB 597
          Author:   Huff (R), et al.
          Amended:  5/5/15  
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE:  8-0, 4/8/15
           AYES:  Liu, Huff, Block, Hancock, Leyva, Mendoza, Pan, Vidak

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  Senate Rule 28.8

           SUBJECT:   Pupil attendance: interdistrict transfers


          SOURCE:    Author


          DIGEST:  This bill extends, for one year, the sunset and repeal  
          dates of statute that allows the governing board of a school  
          district to permit the enrollment of pupils who reside in  
          another district by declaring to be a District of Choice (DOC). 


          ANALYSIS: 

          Existing law:    
          
          1)Authorizes the governing board of a school board to declare  
            themselves a DOC willing to accept a specified number of  
            inter-district transfers.  A DOC is required to select pupils  
            through a random and unbiased process that prohibits  
            enrollment based upon academic or athletic talent.  Priority  
            is given to siblings of children already in attendance in the  
            DOC and children of military personnel.  As a condition of  
            participating in the program, either the district of residence  
            or DOC may prevent a transfer if the transfer would exacerbate  








                                                                     SB 597  
                                                                    Page  2



            racial segregation.  (Education Code § 48300 et. seq.)

          2)Requires each DOC to keep records of:  a) The number of  
            requests granted, denied, or withdrawn as well as the reasons  
            for the denials; b) The number of pupils transferred out of  
            the district, as specified; and c) The number of pupils  
            transferred into the district, as specified.  DOCs are  
            required to annually report this information to neighboring  
            school districts, their county office of education, the  
            Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI), and Department of  
            Finance, as specified.  The Department of Finance is required  
            to make the information available to the Legislative Analyst.   
            The Legislative Analyst is required to conduct a comprehensive  
            evaluation of the DOC program, as specified, and submit the  
            evaluation, along with recommendations, to the appropriate  
            legislative education policy committees, and the Governor by  
            November 1, 2014.  This section is scheduled to sunset July 1,  
            2016.   (EC § 48300 et. seq.)

          This bill:

          1)Extends the inoperative date from July 1, 2016, to July 1,  
            2017, and the repeal date from January 1, 2017, to January 1,  
            2018, for which the governing board of a school district is  
            permitted to enroll students who reside in another district by  
            declaring themselves a school DOC.  

          2)Resets the date for which the Legislative Analyst is required  
            to submit a comprehensive evaluation of the interdistrict  
            transfer program to the appropriate education policy  
            committees of the Legislature and to the Governor from  
            November 1, 2014, to November 1, 2016.

          3)Makes non-substantive technical changes.

          Comments  
           
          1)Need for the bill.  The DOC program, established in 1993, is  
            scheduled to sunset July 1, 2016.  According to the author,  
            many school districts enroll a significant number of students  
            from outside of their district boundaries through the DOC  
            program. As result, ending the program could cause a decline  








                                                                     SB 597  
                                                                    Page  3



            in enrollment for several small school districts. 
          
          2)Data collection and program evaluation.  Delays in the data  
            collection process have stalled the DOC program evaluation  
            along with recommendations for its extension.  Existing law  
            requires the following information to be incorporated within  
            the evaluation; the number and characteristics of pupils who  
            use the school DOC option, the enrollment of school districts  
            of residence and school DOCs and the fiscal health of school  
            districts of residence and school DOCs, as specified.  The  
            statute required the evaluation to be completed and submitted  
            by November 1, 2014.  The California Department of Education  
            (CDE), in March 2015, disseminated a letter to all school  
            districts requesting DOC's to self-identify and provide data  
            required by existing law. 

          Prior Legislation 
          
          SB 680 (Romero and Huff, Chapter 198, Statutes of 2009) extended  
          the inoperative and repeal dates for which school districts are  
          permitted to enroll pupils who reside in another school district  
          by declaring to be a "school district of choice," and repealed  
          the prohibition on new districts electing to become a DOC. 

          AB 1407 (Huffman, 2009) would have extended the sunset and  
          repeal dates for the DOC programs for five years and required a  
          census report on DOC by the CDE by November 2010.  The bill was  
          held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee suspense file.

          AB 270 (Huff, 2007) would have extended the authority for DOC  
          inter-district transfers from July 1, 2007, to July 1, 2009,  
          prohibited additional districts from becoming DOCs, and required  
          school districts (electing to accept transfers) to maintain  
          records on the number of requests it receives and annually  
          report the number of requests it receives to the SPI.  The  
          language of this bill was incorporated into SB 80, the Budget  
          Bill (Budget and Fiscal Review Committee, Chapter 174, Statutes  
          of 2007).

          AB 97 (Nation, Chapter 21, Statutes of 2004) extended the sunset  
          date for one year for the DOC authorization and required the SPI  
          to continue the calculation for the Special Disabilities  








                                                                     SB 597  
                                                                    Page  4



          Adjustment using the current incidence multiplier to allow  
          special education local plan areas to continue to receive funds  
          provided through 2003-04 until a new multiplier is calculated.

          AB 19 (Quackenbush, Chapter 160, Statutes of 1993) established  
          school DOC and allowed the governing board of any school  
          district to declare the district to be a DOC willing to accept a  
          specified number of inter-district transfers.

          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No


          SUPPORT:   (Verified  5/5/15)


          Alexander Valley Union School District
          EdVoice
          Glendora Unified School District
          Inyo County Superintendent of Schools
          Mendocino Unified School District
          Riverside Unified School District
          Round Valley Joint Elementary School
          Round Valley Parent Teacher Organization
          Round Valley School Step Foundation
          San Rafael City Schools 
          Small School Districts Association  
          Vista Del Mar Union School District
          Walnut Valley Unified School District


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified  5/5/15)


          None received



          Prepared by:Olgalilia Ramirez / ED. / (916) 651-4105
          5/6/15 16:49:51










                                                                     SB 597  
                                                                    Page  5



                                   ****  END  ****