Amended in Senate April 6, 2015

Senate BillNo. 615


Introduced by Senator Berryhill

February 27, 2015


An actbegin insert to add Section 13269.1 to the Water Code,end insert relating to water.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 615, as amended, Berryhill. begin deleteGroundwater basin adjudication. end deletebegin insertWaste discharge requirements: waivers: managed wetlands.end insert

begin insert

The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, with certain exceptions, requires a waste discharger to file certain information with the appropriate California regional water quality control board. The act prohibits a waste discharger from taking certain actions relating to the discharge of waste before filing the information with the regional board and also prohibits a waste discharger from taking those actions after filing the report but before the occurrence of certain events. The act requires each regional board to prescribe waste discharge requirements, as specified, that implement relevant water quality control plans. Under the act, the State Water Resources Control Board or a regional board may waive requirements regarding a specific discharge or type of discharge if the state board or regional board determines that the waiver is consistent with any applicable state or regional water quality control plan and is in the public interest. The act requires that the waiver shall not exceed 5 years in duration, but permits the state board or a regional board to renew the waiver. The act requires the waiver to be conditional on specified monitoring requirements but authorizes the state board or a regional board to waive the monitoring requirements for discharges it determines do not pose a significant threat to water quality.

end insert
begin insert

This bill would require that managed wetlands be presumed to not pose a significant threat to water quality and would require, with respect to managed wetlands, the state board and regional boards to waive the above-described reporting requirements, regional board prescribed waste discharge requirements, and monitoring requirements of the waiver program, except that the state board or a regional board shall require water quality monitoring of a managed wetland not more than once during the duration of each waiver period unless results of downstream monitoring demonstrate a violation of water quality discharge standards. The bill would limit this monitoring to contaminants that are actually applied by wetland managers to the wetland and contaminants that are known to be naturally present in the wetland environment.

end insert
begin delete

Existing law specifies the jurisdiction of the courts. Under existing law, courts may adjudicate rights to produce groundwater and exercise other powers relating to the supervision of a groundwater basin.

end delete
begin delete

This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to streamline the process for the adjudication of groundwater rights.

end delete

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1begin insert

begin insertSECTION 1.end insert  

end insert
begin insert

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

end insert
begin insert

3(a) Before European and American settlement, approximately
4four million acres in California flooded on a seasonal basis,
5forming wetlands.

end insert
begin insert

6(b) These wetlands supported migratory birds in the tens of
7millions, as well as other wetlands-dependent wildlife and fish,
8including several endangered species.

end insert
begin insert

9(c) Following reclamation of the wetlands in the past two
10 centuries, less than 10 percent of the historical seasonal wetlands
11are still in existence.

end insert
begin insert

12(d) These wetlands consist largely of private lands, federal
13refuges, and state wildlife areas.

end insert
begin insert

14(e) Approximately five million migratory waterfowl, traveling
15on the Pacific Flyway, now winter in California on the remaining
16wetlands.

end insert
begin insert

P3    1(f) A variety of other wildlife species, including shorebirds,
2resident waterfowl, sandhill cranes, giant garter snakes,
3white-faced ibis, and other wetlands-dependent species, depend
4on the remaining wetlands for their survival.

end insert
begin insert

5(g) These species are public trust resources, protected by the
6North American Waterfowl Management Plan, the Migratory Bird
7Treaty Act, the state and federal Endangered Species Acts, and
8other state, federal, and international statutes and treaties.

end insert
begin insert

9(h) Most of the remaining seasonal wetlands are managed to
10optimize habitat values, with the intent of providing adequate
11nutrients, nesting cover, and brood water, and other habitat values
12for migratory waterfowl and other wetlands-dependent species.

end insert
begin insert

13(i) Managed wetlands have been shown to provide improved
14habitat values not just for migratory waterfowl and other
15wetlands-dependent species, but also for salmonids and other fish
16species that find refuge and nutrition in order to grow strong
17enough to move on into open waters.

end insert
begin insert

18(j) Seasonal and managed wetlands can improve the quality of
19water that is used to flood habitat and then discharged for reuse
20elsewhere.

end insert
begin insert

21(k) Water quality regulations should not impose a cost on
22wetlands, as an important public trust resource, beyond the extent
23to which wetlands actually contribute to nonpoint source pollution
24of the waters of the state.

end insert
25begin insert

begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

end insert

begin insertSection 13269.1 is added to the end insertbegin insertWater Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert

begin insert
26

begin insert13269.1.end insert  

(a) As a public trust resource, managed wetlands,
27whether owned and operated by state, federal, or local agencies,
28or private landowners, shall be presumed not to pose a significant
29threat to water quality. In accordance with paragraphs (1) and
30(3) of subdivision (a) of Section 13269, the state board or a
31regional board shall waive the provisions of subdivisions (a) and
32(c) of Section 13260, subdivision (a) of Section 13263, and
33subdivision (a) of Section 13264 with respect to managed wetlands.

34(b) (1) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision
35(a) of Section 13269, unless the results of downstream monitoring
36of a managed wetland demonstrate a violation of water quality
37discharge standards, the state board or a regional board shall
38require water quality monitoring, as described in paragraph (2)
39of subdivision (a) of Section 13269, of the managed wetland not
P4    1more than once during the duration of each waiver period granted
2pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 13269.

3(2) Monitoring pursuant to this subdivision shall be limited to
4contaminants that are actually applied by wetland managers to
5the managed wetland and contaminants that are known to be
6naturally present in the wetland environment. Monitoring shall
7not include contaminants that are present in the managed wetland
8as a result of third-party activities outside of the managed wetland
9area.

end insert
begin delete
10

SECTION 1.  

It is the intent of the Legislature to enact
11legislation to streamline the process for the adjudication of
12groundwater rights.

end delete


O

    98