Amended in Senate June 2, 2015

Amended in Senate May 5, 2015

Amended in Senate April 22, 2015

Senate BillNo. 637


Introduced by Senator Allen

February 27, 2015


An act to amend Section 5653 of the Fish and Game Code, and to add Section 13172.5 to the Water Code, relating to dredging.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 637, as amended, Allen. Suction dredge mining: permits.

Existing law prohibits the use of any vacuum or suction dredge equipment by any person in any river, stream, or lake of this state without a permit issued by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Existing law requires, before any person uses any vacuum or suction dredge equipment in any river, stream, or lake of this state, that person to submit an application for a permit for a vacuum or suction dredge to the department specifying certain information. Existing law requires the department to issue a permit, if the department determines that the use of a vacuum or suction dredge will not be deleterious to fish, upon the payment of a specified fee. Existing law designates the issuance of permits to operate vacuum or suction dredge equipment to be a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and suspends the issuance of permits and mining pursuant to a permit until the department has completed an environmental impact report for the project as ordered by the court in a specified court action. Existing law prohibits the use of any vacuum or suction dredge equipment in any river, stream, or lake of this state until the Director of Fish and Wildlife makes a prescribed certification to the Secretary of State, including certifying that new regulations fully mitigate all identified significant environmental impacts and that a fee structure is in place that will fully cover all costs to the department related to the administration of the program.

This bill would require the department to issue a permit if the department determines that the use does not cause any significant effectsbegin delete onend deletebegin insert toend insert fish and wildlife and would authorize the department to adjust the specified fee to an amount sufficient to cover all reasonable costs of the department in regulating suction dredging activities. This bill would prohibit the department from issuing a permit until the permit application is deemed complete, as prescribed.

Under existing law, the State Water Resources Control Board and the California regional water quality control boards prescribe waste discharge requirements in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (state act). The state act, with certain exceptions, requires a waste discharger to file certain information with the appropriate regional board and to pay an annual fee. The state act additionally requires a person, before discharging mining waste, to submit to the regional board a report on the physical and chemical characteristics of the waste that could affect its potential to cause pollution or contamination and a report that evaluates the potential of the mining waste discharge to produce acid mine drainage, the discharge or leaching of heavy metals, or the release of other hazardous substances.

This bill wouldbegin delete require, by July 1, 2017end deletebegin insert authorize, after the director has made the prescribed certification to the Secretary of Stateend insert, the state boardbegin insert or a regional boardend insert tobegin delete establish a permitting process for suction dredge mining and related mining activities in rivers and streams in the state, consistent with requirements of the state act. The bill would require that the regulations, at a minimum, address cumulative and water quality impacts of specified issues. A person who violates these regulations would be liable for an unspecified penalty. The bill would provide that the state board is not prohibited from adopting regulations that would prohibit suction dredge mining, if the state board makes a certain finding relating to water quality objectives, to the extent consistent with federal law. The bill would prohibit these provisions from affecting any other law, including the California Environmental Quality Act and specified provisions relating to streambed alteration requirements.end deletebegin insert adopt waste discharge requirements that address water quality impacts of specified issues, specify certain conditions or areas where the discharge of waste from a suction dredge is prohibited, or prohibit particular methods of suction dredge mining if the state board or regional board makes a certain determination.end insert

The bill would specify that a suction dredge contains any of specified components for purposes of permits issued by the department and for purposes of thebegin delete permittingend deletebegin insert regulatoryend insert process established by the state boardbegin insert or a regional boardend insert.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P3    1begin insert

begin insertSECTION 1.end insert  

end insert

begin insertThe Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:end insert

begin insert

3(a) In 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill 670
4(Chapter 62 of the Statutes of 2009) which established a temporary
5ban on suction dredge mining until after a court-ordered
6environmental review was completed.

end insert
begin insert

7(b) The Department of Fish and Wildlife draft regulations and
8draft environmental impact report were issued in February 2011.
9The draft environmental impact report identified nine significant
10and unmitigable impacts from suction dredge mining. The report
11concluded that suction dredge mining for gold mobilizes and
12discharges toxic levels of mercury, harming drinking water quality
13and potentially poisoning fish and wildlife, harms fish, amphibians,
14and songbirds by disrupting habitat, and causes substantial adverse
15changes statewide in American Indian cultural and historical
16resources.

end insert
begin insert

17(c) In July 2011, the Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 120
18(Chapter 133 of the Statutes of 2011), extending the prohibition
19on suction dredge mining until 2016, and requiring the department
20to create a fee structure that would cover all of its administrative
21costs relating to suction dredge mining.

end insert
begin insert

22(d) In 2012, the Legislature acted again on suction dredge
23mining by enacting Senate Bill 1018 (Chapter 39 of the Statutes
24of 2012), which eliminated the sunset provision from Assembly
25Bill 120. Senate Bill 1018 also directed the department to consult
26with various agencies and to provide recommendations to the
27Legislature by April 1, 2013, regarding statutory changes or
P4    1authorizations necessary for the department to promulgate suction
2dredge regulations. Those recommendations were to include ways
3to fully mitigate all identified significant environmental impacts
4and a fee structure to cover the department’s costs of administering
5the program.

end insert
begin insert

6(e) On April 1, 2013, the department submitted the required
7report to the Legislature. The department considers the
8environmental impact report on its proposed suction dredge mining
9regulatory permit program to be the most comprehensive review
10of suction dredge mining ever compiled in California. The report
11identified impacts that the department said could not be mitigated
12within its legal authorities.

end insert
begin insert

13(f) In January 2015, the San Bernardino Superior Court issued
14a tentative ruling that state-issued suction dredge mining permits
15could not be required on federal land. The court noted that, while
16the state clearly has the power to issue suction dredge mining
17permits, the state’s refusal or inability to issue the permits creates
18an obstacle to conforming with federal law.

end insert
begin insert

19(g) Given the importance of protecting the water supply for all
20Californian’s from degradation, the need to protect what is left of
21California native cultural sites, and the value of protecting the
22state’s wildlife, it is urgent that the Legislature act immediately
23to clarify the laws regulating suction dredge mining and other
24related forms of small scale motorized gold mining in the state’s
25streams and waterways.

end insert
26

begin deleteSECTION 1.end delete
27begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

Section 5653 of the Fish and Game Code is amended
28to read:

29

5653.  

(a) The use of a vacuum or suction dredge equipment
30by a person in a river, stream, or lake of this state is prohibited,
31except as authorized under a permit issued to that person by the
32department in compliance with the regulations adopted pursuant
33to Section 5653.9. Before a person uses a vacuum or suction dredge
34equipment in a river, stream, or lake of this state, that person shall
35submit an application for a permit for a vacuum or suction dredge
36to the department, specifying the type and size of equipment to be
37used and other information as the department may require.

38(b) (1) The department shall not issue a permit for a vacuum
39or suction dredge until the permit application is deemed complete.
40A complete permit application shall include copies of all required
P5    1permits, including permits required under the Federal Water
2Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.) and the Water
3Code, and any other applicable permit required to fully mitigate
4all identified significant environmental impacts pursuant to
5regulations adopted under subdivision (b) of Section 5653.1.

6(2) If the State Water Resources Control Board or the
7appropriate regional water quality control board determines that
8no water quality or water rights permit is necessary for the use of
9a vacuum or suction dredge, a letter stating this determination
10signed by the Executive Director of the State Water Resources
11Control Board, the executive officer of the appropriate regional
12water quality control board, or their designee shall be part of the
13permit application.

14(3) For the purpose of the Permit Streamlining Act (Chapter 4.5
15(commencing with Section 65920) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the
16Government Code), the department shall not deem the permit
17application complete until the applicant submits all necessary
18permits and any required letters to the department as part of the
19permit application.

20(c) Under the regulations adopted pursuant to Section 5653.9,
21the department shall designate waters or areas wherein vacuum or
22suction dredges may be used pursuant to a permit, waters or areas
23closed to those dredges, the maximum size of those dredges that
24may be used, and the time of year when those dredges may be
25used. If the department determines, pursuant to the regulations
26adopted pursuant to Section 5653.9, that the use of a vacuum or
27suction dredge does not cause any significant effects to fish and
28wildlife, it shall issue a permit to the applicant. If a person operates
29equipment other than that authorized by the permit or conducts
30the operation in any waters or area or at any time that is not
31authorized by the permit, or if any person conducts the operation
32without securing the permit, that person is guilty of a misdemeanor.

33(d) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the department
34shall issue a permit upon the payment, in the case of a resident, of
35a base fee of twenty-five dollars ($25), as adjusted under Section
36713, when an onsite investigation of the project size is not deemed
37necessary by the department, and a base fee of one hundred thirty
38 dollars ($130), as adjusted under Section 713, when the department
39deems that an onsite investigation is necessary. Except as provided
40in paragraph (2), in the case of a nonresident, the base fee shall be
P6    1one hundred dollars ($100), as adjusted under Section 713, when
2an onsite investigation is not deemed necessary, and a base fee of
3two hundred twenty dollars ($220), as adjusted under Section 713,
4when an onsite investigation is deemed necessary.

5(2) The department may adjust the base fees for a permit
6described in this subdivision to an amount sufficient to cover all
7reasonable costs of the department in regulating suction dredging
8activities.

9(e) It is unlawful to possess a vacuum or suction dredge in areas,
10or in or within 100 yards of waters, that are closed to the use of
11vacuum or suction dredges.

12(f) For purposes of this section and Section 5653.1, a suction
13dredge contains any of the following:

14(1) A hose that vacuums sediment from a river, stream, or lake.

15(2) A motorized pump.

16(3) A motorized sluice box.

17

begin deleteSEC. 2.end delete
18begin insertSEC. 3.end insert  

Section 13172.5 is added to the Water Code, to read:

begin delete
19

13172.5.  

(a) On or before July 1, 2017, the state board shall
20establish by regulation a permitting process for suction dredge
21mining and related mining activities in rivers and streams in the
22state. The regulations shall be consistent with the requirements of
23this division and, at a minimum, address cumulative and water
24quality impacts of each of the following:

end delete
25begin insert

begin insert13172.5.end insert  

end insert
begin insert

(a) After the Director of Fish and Wildlife has
26certified to the Secretary of State that all of the events described
27in subdivision (b) of Section 5653.1 of the Fish and Game Code
28have occurred, the state board or a regional board may take one
29or more of the following actions:

end insert
begin insert

30(1) Adopt waste discharge requirements that, at a minimum,
31address the water quality impacts of each of the following:

end insert
begin delete

32(1)

end delete

33begin insert(A)end insert Mercury loading to downstream reaches ofbegin delete rivers and
34streams affected by suction dredge mining.end delete
begin insert surface water bodies
35affected by suction dredge mining.end insert

begin delete

36(2)

end delete

37begin insert(B)end insert Methylmercury formation in water bodies.

begin delete

38(3)

end delete

39begin insert(C)end insert Bioaccumulation of mercury in aquatic organisms.

begin delete

P7    1(b) A person who violates a regulation adopted pursuant to this
2section shall be liable in the amount of ____ ($____).

3(c) Nothing in subdivision (a) shall prohibit the state board from
4adopting regulations that prohibit suction dredge mining if the
5state board finds that prohibition is necessary to regulate waste
6discharges that violate or impair water quality objectives or other
7criteria under this division, to the extent consistent with federal
8law. In making this determination, the state board may consider,
9but is not limited to, soil types, fueling and refueling activities,
10and horsepower limitations.

11(d) This section does not affect any other law, including the
12California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing
13with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code) and the
14Department of Fish and Wildlife’s streambed alteration
15requirements described in Chapter 6 (commencing with Section
161600) of the Fish and Game Code.

end delete
begin insert

17(D) Resuspension of metals.

end insert
begin insert

18(2) Specify certain conditions or areas where the discharge of
19waste from suction dredge mining is prohibited, consistent with
20Section 13243.

end insert
begin insert

21(3) Prohibit any particular methods of suction dredge mining
22that the state board or a regional board determines generally
23cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable water quality
24objectives or unreasonably impact beneficial uses.

end insert
begin delete

25(e)

end delete

26begin insert(b)end insert For purposes of this section, a suction dredge contains any
27of the following:

28(1) A hose that vacuums sediment from a river, stream, or lake.

29(2) A motorized pump.

30(3) A motorized sluice box.



O

    96