BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 654 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 22, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Tony Thurmond, Chair SB 654 (Jackson) - As Amended August 18, 2016 SENATE VOTE: 21-16 SUBJECT: Unlawful employment practice: parental leave SUMMARY: Enacts the "New Parent Leave Act" to, among other things, require an employer of 20 or more employees to allow eligible employees to take up to six (6) weeks of job-protected parental leave to bond with a new child. Specifically, this bill: 1)Defines "employer" to mean either of the following: a) A person who directly employs (within 75 miles of the worksite) 20 or more persons to perform services for a wage or salary. b) The state and any political subdivision of the state and cities. 2)Makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to SB 654 Page 2 refuse to allow an employee, with more than 12 months and at least 1,250 hours of service with the employer, to take up to six (6) weeks of parental leave to bond with a new child within one year of the child's birth, adoption or foster care placement. 3)Requires the employer to provide a guarantee of employment in the same or comparable position upon return, as specified. 4)Provides that the employee may utilize accrued vacation pay, paid sick time, other accrued paid time off, or other paid or unpaid time off negotiated with the employer, during the period of parental leave. 5)Makes is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to refuse to maintain and pay for continued group health coverage for eligible employees who take parental leave at the same level and under the same conditions that would have been provided of the employee had continued to work during the duration of the leave. 6)Specifies that an employee is entitled to take Pregnancy Disability Leave, in addition to the leave provided in this bill, if the employee is otherwise qualified for that leave. 7)Provides that this bill does not apply to an employee subject to both the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) and the federal Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). 8)Provides that in any case in which two employees who are entitled to leave for the same birth, adoption or foster care placement are employed by the same employer, the employer is not required, but may elect, to grant simultaneous leave to SB 654 Page 3 both employees. 9)Provides that the basic minimum duration of the leave shall be two weeks. However, an employer may grant requests for additional occasions of leave lasting less than two weeks. 10)Provides that leave under this bill shall run concurrently with parental leave taken pursuant to a specified provision of existing law applicable to certain certificated school employees. 11)Provides that this bill shall become operative on January 1, 2018. EXISTING LAW: 1)Provides that the CFRA and the federal FMLA, required to be taken concurrently, entitles eligible workers of employers with 50 or more employees to: a) Take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid, job-protected leave during a 12-month period for specified family and medical reasons, including time to bond with a new child through birth, adoption or foster care placement, among others. b) Guaranteed reinstatement to the same or comparable SB 654 Page 4 position. c) Continued group health coverage during the duration of the leave under the same terms and conditions. 2)Establishes the Paid Family Leave (PFL) program, within the State Disability Insurance program, as a partial wage-replacement plan funded through employee payroll deductions. Among other things: a) PFL provides eligible employees with up to six weeks of wage replacement benefits to care for a seriously ill child, spouse or registered domestic partner, parent, siblings, grandparents, grandchildren, and parents-in-laws or to bond with a minor child within one year of the birth or placement of the child in connection with foster care or adoption. b) Employers may require that employees take up to two weeks of earned but unused vacation when using PFL. The law does not allow employers to require employees to use sick leave. SB 654 Page 5 c) PFL does not provide job protection or return to work rights. d) PFL does not require continued group health coverage during leave. 3)Establishes that Pregnancy Disability Leave (PDL), under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, requires private employers with five or more employees and public employers to provide up to four months of unpaid, job-protected leave for pregnancy, childbirth or related conditions. a) Employees may use accrued vacation and paid sick leave during PDL. b) Employees are entitled to reasonable accommodations and reinstatement to the job held before PDL began. SB 654 Page 6 c) Employers are required to continue health coverage during PDL. FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown COMMENTS: This bill would establish the New Parent Leave Act under FEHA and make it an unlawful employment practice for an employer, as defined, to refuse to allow an employee to take up to six (6) weeks of parental leave to bond with a new child within one year of the child's birth, adoption, or foster care placement. This bill would also prohibit an employer from refusing to maintain and pay for coverage under a group health plan for an employee who takes this leave. According to the author, under current law, only those who work for an employer of 50 or more are eligible for job protected parental leave under California law. That leaves many new parents with an impossible choice between the wellbeing of his or her new child and his or her family's financial security. Supporters argue that this bill would drastically improve access to parental leave by providing job protection to more California workers. Supporters assert that this bill would ensure that millions of California workers who have been paying into the PFL insurance program are able to use this benefit for parental leave without risk of losing their job. The need for expanded and equitable access to parental leave in the state cannot be understated. The co-sponsors note that the benefits of parental SB 654 Page 7 leave on the health and welfare of the economy and our state's working families have been well-documented. Research shows that parental leave, particularly when there is job protection, increases new mothers' wage growth and future employment rates. Fathers who take parental leave are more engaged with their newborns, promoting greater gender equity at home and at work. In addition, evidence strongly suggests that children enjoy many short- and long-term benefits from parental leave, including better health and higher high school graduation rates. Opponents argue that this bill will overwhelm small employers. They assert that even though the leave under this bill is not "paid" by the employer, that does not mean the small employer will not suffer added costs. While on leave, the employer will have to: (1) maintain medical benefits while the employee is on leave; (2) pay for a temporary employee to cover for the employee on leave, usually at a higher premium given the limited duration of employment; or (3) pay overtime to other employees to cover the work of the employee on leave. The cost of overtime is higher given the increase of the minimum wage, which will add to the overall cost on small employers. Opponents also contend that California already imposes a list of family-friendly leaves of absences on employers, including paid sick days, school activities leave, kin care, the paid family leave program, pregnancy disability leave, and the CFRA. This list is in addition to the leaves of absence required at the federal level. They assert that imposing another 6-week leave of absence, targeted specifically at small employers, is simply too much for employers to bear. Finally, opponents assert that this bill exposes employers to costly litigation and cited to a study by an insurance provider that estimated the cost for a small to mid-size employer to defend and settle a single plaintiff discrimination claim was approximately $125,000. Opponents contend that this amount, especially for a small employer, reflects the financial risk associated with defending a lawsuit under FEHA, such as the litigation that would be created by this bill, and the ability SB 654 Page 8 to leverage an employer into resolving or settling the case regardless of merit. Prior Related Legislation This bill is similar to SB 1166 (Jackson), which failed passage in the Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment earlier this year. However, among other changes, this bill extends the employee threshold from 10 to 20 employees, and reduces the amount of job-protected leave from 12 weeks to six (6) weeks. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support 9 to 5 9 to 5 California Chapter and National Association Alliance for Community Empowerment American Association of University Women American Civil Liberties Union of California Antelope Valley Hospital WIC Program Breastfeed LA SB 654 Page 9 California Asset Building Coalition California Black Health Network California Child Care Resource & Referral Network California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls California Domestic Workers Coalition California Edge Coalition California Employment Lawyers Association (co-sponsor) California Hunger Action Coalition California Immigrant Policy Center California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO California Latinas for Reproductive Justice California Legislative Women's Caucus California Partnership SB 654 Page 10 California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation California Teachers Association California Women's Law Center California Work and Family Coalition Career Ladders Project Center for Popular Democracy Center for WorkLife Law at UC Hastings Child Care Law Center Child Family Guidance Center Children's Hospital Los Angeles Common Sense Kids Action Consumer Attorneys of California Courage Campaign SB 654 Page 11 Employment Lawyers Association Equal Rights Advocates (co-sponsor) First 5 California Healthy Communities, Inc. Legal Aid Society - Employment Law Center (co-sponsor) Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Association Maternal and Child Health Access Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund Mujeres Unidas y Activas National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter National Association of Working Women National Council of Jewish Women California Numerous Individuals SB 654 Page 12 Organization of SMUD Employees Our Family Coalition Parent Voices Raising California Together San Diego Court Employees Association San Luis Obispo County Employees Association Service Employees International Union South LA Health Projects Stronger California Advocates Network The Opportunity Institute Tradeswomen, Inc. UFCW Western State Council Voices for Progress SB 654 Page 13 Western Center on Law and Poverty Women's Foundation of California Opposition Acclamation Insurance Management Services Agricultural Council of California Allied Managed Care American Petroleum and Convenience Store Association Associated Builders and Contractors - San Diego Chapter Associated Builders and Contractors of California CalAsian Chamber of Commerce California Ambulance Association California Association for Health Services at Home SB 654 Page 14 California Association of Joint Powers Authorities California Association of Nursery and Garden Centers California Bankers Association California Business Properties Association California Chamber of Commerce California Farm Bureau Federation California Hotel and Lodging Association California Landscape Contractors Association California League of Food Processors California Manufacturers and Technology Association California Professional Association of Specialty Contractors California Restaurant Association California Retailers Association SB 654 Page 15 California State Association of Counties California Travel Association Chambers of Commerce Alliance of Ventura and Santa Barbara County Civil Justice Association of California Coalition of Small and Disabled Veteran Businesses Culver City Chamber of Commerce El Centro Chamber of Commerce Family Winemakers of California Flasher Barricade Association Greater Bakersfield Chamber of Commerce Greater Fresno Area Chamber of Commerce Greater Merced Chamber of Commerce International Franchise Association SB 654 Page 16 Lake County Chamber of Commerce League of California Cities National Federation of Independent Business North Orange County Chamber of Commerce Oxnard Chamber of Commerce Palm Desert Area Chamber of Commerce Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors Association of California Rancho Cordova Chamber of Commerce Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce Santa Maria Chamber of Commerce Visitor & Convention Bureau South Bay Alliance of Chambers of Commerce The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce The Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce SB 654 Page 17 Western Carwash Association Western Electrical Contractors Association Western Growers Association Yuba-Sutter Chamber of Commerce Analysis Prepared by:Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091