Amended in Senate April 14, 2015

Senate BillNo. 671


Introduced by Senator Hill

February 27, 2015


An act to add Section 4073.5 to the Business and Professions Code, relating to pharmacy.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 671, as amended, Hill. Pharmacy: biological product.

The Pharmacy Law governs the practice of pharmacy in this state, including the permissible duties of licensed pharmacists. Among other permitted acts, a pharmacist filling a prescription order for a drug product prescribed by its trade or brand name is authorized to select another drug product with the same active chemical ingredients of the same strength, quantity, and dosage form, and of the same generic drug name as determined, as specified, of those drug products having the same active chemical ingredients. A person who knowingly violates the Pharmacy Law is guilty of a misdemeanor, as specified.

This bill would authorize a pharmacist, in his or her discretion, except as specified, to select an alternative biological product when filling a prescription order for a prescribed biological product if the alternative biological product is interchangeable, as defined, and the prescriber does not personally indicate “Do not substitute,” as specified. The bill would also require a pharmacist or his or her designee when dispensing a biological product to communicate to the prescriber the specific biological product provided to the patient, including the name of the product and the manufacturer, except as specified. The bill would prohibit a pharmacist from selecting an alternative biological product that meets the requirements of these provisions unless the cost to the patient of the alternative biological product selected is the same or less than the cost of the prescribed biological product. The bill would also require that the substitution of a biological product be communicated to the patient. Because a knowing violation of these requirements would be a misdemeanor, the bill would create new crimes, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program.

The bill would also require the California State Board of Pharmacy to maintain on its public Internet Web site a link to the current list, if available, of biological products determined by the federal Food and Drug Administration to be interchangeable.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 4073.5 is added to the Business and
2Professions Code
, to read:

3

4073.5.  

(a) A pharmacist filling a prescription order for a
4prescribed biological product may select an alternative biological
5product only if all of the following:

6(1) The alternative biological product is interchangeable, as
7defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h).

8(2) The prescriber does not personally indicate “Do not
9substitute,” or words of similar meaning, in the manner provided
10in subdivision (c).

11(b) Withinbegin delete a reasonable timeend deletebegin insert five daysend insert following the dispensing
12of a biological product, a dispensing pharmacist or the pharmacists’
13designee shall communicate to the prescriber the specific biological
14product provided to the patient, including the name of the
15biological product and the manufacturer. The communication shall
16be conveyed by making an entry into an interoperable electronic
17medical records system, through electronic prescribing technology,
18or a pharmacy record that is electronically accessible by the
19prescriber. Otherwise, the pharmacist or the pharmacist’s designee
20shall communicate the name of the biological product dispensed
P3    1to the prescriber using facsimile, telephone, electronic transmission,
2or other prevailing means, except that communication shall not be
3required in this instance to the prescriber when either of the
4following apply:

5(1) There is no FDA-approved interchangeable biological
6product, as defined in subdivision (h), for the product prescribed.

7(2) A refill prescription is not changed from the product
8dispensed on the prior filling of the prescription.

9(c) In no case shall a selection be made pursuant to this section
10if the prescriber personally indicates, either orally or in his or her
11own handwriting, “Do not substitute,” or words of similar meaning.

12(1) This subdivision shall not prohibit a prescriber from checking
13a box on a prescription marked “Do not substitute,” provided that
14the prescriber personally initials the box or checkmark.

15(2) To indicate that a selection shall not be made pursuant to
16this section for an electronic data transmission prescription, as
17defined in subdivision (c) of Section 4040, a prescriber may
18indicate “Do not substitute,” or words of similar meaning, in the
19prescription as transmitted by electronic data, or may check a box
20marked on the prescription “Do not substitute.” In either instance,
21it shall not be required that the prohibition on substitution be
22manually initialed by the prescriber.

23(d) Selection pursuant to this section is within the discretion of
24the pharmacist, except as provided in subdivision (c). A pharmacist
25who selects the biological product to be dispensed pursuant to this
26section shall assume the same responsibility for substituting the
27biological product as would be incurred in filling a prescription
28for a biological product prescribed by name. There shall be no
29liability on the prescriber for an act or omission by a pharmacist
30in selecting, preparing, or dispensing a biological product pursuant
31to this section. In no case shall the pharmacist select a biological
32product that meets the requirements of subdivision (a) unless the
33cost to the patient of the biological product selected is the same
34or less than the cost of the prescribed biological product. Cost, as
35used in this subdivision, includes any professional fee that may be
36charged by the pharmacist.

37(e) This section shall apply to all prescriptions, including those
38presented by or on behalf of persons receiving assistance from the
39federal government or pursuant to the Medi-Cal Act set forth in
P4    1Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000) of Part 3 of Division
29 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.

3(f) When a selection is made pursuant to this section, the
4substitution of a biological product shall be communicated to the
5patient.

6(g) The board shall maintain on its public Internet Web site a
7link to the current list, if available, of biological products
8determined by the FDA to be interchangeable, as defined in
9paragraph (2) of subdivision (h).

10(h) For purposes of this section, the following terms shall have
11the following meanings:

12(1) “Biological product” has the same meaning that applies to
13that term under Section 351 of the federal Public Health Service
14Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 262(i)).

15(2) “Interchangeable” means a biological product that the FDA
16has determined meets the standards set forth in 42 U.S.C. Section
17262(k)(4), or has been deemed therapeutically equivalent by the
18FDA as set forth in the latest addition or supplement of the
19Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence
20Evaluations.

21(3) “Prescription,” with respect to a biological product, means
22a prescription for a product that is subject to Sectionbegin delete 503Bend deletebegin insert 503(b)end insert
23 of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. Sec.
24353(b)).

25(i) This section shall not prohibit the administration of
26immunizations, as permitted in begin delete Section 4052.end delete begin insert Sections 4052 and
274052.8.end insert

28(j) This section shall not prohibit a disability insurer or health
29care service plan from requiring prior authorization or imposing
30other appropriate utilization controls in approving coverage for
31any biological product.

32

SEC. 2.  

No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
33Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
34the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
35district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or
36infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
37for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of
38the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within
P5    1the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
2Constitution.



O

    98