BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 671| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: SB 671 Author: Hill (D) Amended: 5/5/15 Vote: 21 SENATE BUS, PROF. & ECON. DEV. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 4/13/15 AYES: Hill, Bates, Block, Galgiani, Hernandez, Jackson, Wieckowski NO VOTE RECORDED: Berryhill, Mendoza SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE: 9-0, 4/29/15 AYES: Hernandez, Nguyen, Hall, Mitchell, Monning, Nielsen, Pan, Roth, Wolk SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8 SUBJECT: Pharmacy: biological product.Pharmacy: biological product SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill authorizes a pharmacist to substitute an alternative biological product when filling a prescription for a prescribed biological product under specified circumstances. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Enacts the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act (FDCA) which requires drug manufacturers to obtain approval of new drugs from the SB 671 Page 2 federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (21 U.S.C. Sec. 355) 2)Prohibits a person from delivering for introduction into interstate commerce any biological product unless a license is issued pursuant to the Public Health Service Act (PHSA). (42 U.S.C. Sec. 262) 3)Creates an abbreviated pathway for biological products that are similar to or interchangeable with licensed biological products, known as the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA). (42 U.S.C. Sec. 262 (k)) 4)Clarifies that a product is biosimilar to a reference product under the BPCIA if the proposed biosimilar product is highly similar to the reference product, notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and that no clinically meaningful differences exist between the proposed biosimilar product and the reference product in terms of safety, purity and potency. (42 U.S.C. Sec. 262(i)(2)(A) and (B)) 5)Clarifies that state law governs how and when pharmacists may make prescription drug substitutions. (1 Food and Drug Admin. Sec. 13:197 (2011)) 6) Authorizes pharmacists filling prescription orders for drug products prescribed by their trade or brand names to substitute generic drugs for orders if the generic contains the same active chemical ingredients of equivalent strength and duration of therapy, subject to a patient notification and bottle labeling requirement, unless the prescriber specifies that a pharmacist may not substitute another drug product by either indicating on the form submitted for the filling of the prescription drug orders "Do not substitute" or words of similar meaning or selecting a box on the form marked "Do not substitute." (Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 4073) 7) Authorizes pharmacists filling prescription orders for drug products prescribed by their trade or brand names to substitute a drug product with a different form of medication with the same active chemical ingredients of equivalent strength and duration of therapy as the prescribed drug SB 671 Page 3 product when the change will improve the ability of the patient to comply with the prescribed drug therapy, subject to a patient notification and bottle labeling requirement, unless the prescriber specifies that a pharmacist may not substitute another drug product by either indicating on the form submitted for the filling of the prescription drug orders "Do not substitute" or words of similar meaning or selecting a box on the form marked "Do not substitute." (BPC § 4052.5) This bill: 1)Updates permitted functions for pharmacists to allow a pharmacist to substitute an alternative biological product only for a prescribed biological product if the alternative biological product is interchangeable; the prescriber has not personally indicated, either orally or in his or her own handwriting "Do not substitute" or words of similar meaning; and within a reasonable time following the dispensing of a biological product, a dispensing pharmacist or the pharmacist's designee communicates to the prescriber the specific biological product provided to the patient, including the name of the biological product. Provides that the communication shall be conveyed by making an entry into an interoperable electronic medical records system, through electronic prescribing technology, or a pharmacy record that is electronically accessible by the prescriber; and provides that otherwise, the pharmacist or pharmacist's designee shall communicate the name of the biological product dispensed to the prescriber using facsimile, telephone, electronic transmission or other prevailing means. 2)Clarifies that communication is not required to be made to a prescriber when either there is no interchangeable biological product approved by the FDA or a refill prescription is not changed from the product dispensed on the prior filing of the prescription. 3)Provides that selection of an alternative biological product is within the discretion of the pharmacist except when a prescriber indicates "Do not substitute." States that a pharmacist who selects the biological product according to the provisions of this bill assumes the same responsibility for substituting an alternative biological product as would be SB 671 Page 4 incurred in filling a prescription for a biological product prescribed by name. 4)Removes liability of a prescriber for an act or omission by a pharmacist in selecting, preparing or dispensing an alternative biological product. 5)Prohibits a pharmacist from selecting an alternative biological product unless the cost to the patient is the same or less than the cost of the prescribed biological product, including any professional fee that may be charged by the pharmacist. 6)Requires a communication also be made to the patient when an alternative biological product is substituted for a biological product. 7)Requires the Board of Pharmacy to maintain a link to the current list, if available, of biological products determined by the FDA to be interchangeable, on its Internet Web site. 8)Clarifies that a disability insurer or health care service plan is not prohibited from requiring prior authorization or imposing other appropriate utilization controls in approving coverage for any biological product. Background Biologic medicines are sensitive medications that typically treat very serious diseases and conditions, including blood conditions, cancers, immune disorders like Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis and Crohn's Disease and neurological disorders like Multiple Sclerosis. These treatments are not widespread but rather used as specialty drugs to treat very ill patients. According to the FDA, biologics are regulated under the federal PHSA while drugs, including insulin and other hormone therapies, are regulated under the FDCA. Both the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research have regulatory responsibility for therapeutic biological products, including premarket review and oversight. If trials and studies demonstrate that a product is safe and effective for its intended use, the FDA may then approve the market of a biologic by granting a biologics license. SB 671 Page 5 Biosimilars are similar but not identical versions of the original biologic. The active ingredient of a biosimilar is expected to closely resemble that of the original biologic and unlike generic pills which require the active ingredient to be identical, the exact manufacturing process of an original biologic cannot be exactly duplicated in the same way that small molecule drugs like pills, which are not as structurally complex and are instead relatively simple can be exactly duplicated. Generic pills are exact copies of originator drugs. A pathway for biosimilar regulation in the U.S. was established as a provision of the 2008 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and in 2012 the FDA issued draft guidelines for biosimilars. The guidance included which types of studies manufacturers should undertake in order to ensure product safety, potency and purity. In addition to the draft guidelines for biosimilars the FDA has also compiled a list of biological products, including any biosimilar and interchangeable biological products licensed by the FDA under the PHSA. Currently, only one biosimilar product has been approved by the FDA. On March 6, 2015, the FDA approved, Zarxio (filgrastim-sndz). There are currently no interchangeable biological products approved by the FDA and the timeline for approval of an interchangeable biological product is unknown. Out-of-pocket costs to patients are typically higher to receive biologics than for generic drugs and biosimilars are seen as playing an important part in medication cost reductions by providing cost-effective alternatives to very expensive originator biological products and are anticipated to play a key role in the treatment of illnesses and chronic conditions in the U.S. According to a 2007 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report issued when the BPCIA was being considered in Congress, "In recent years, total spending on biologics has grown rapidly, with nominal spending growth averaging roughly between 15 percent and 20 percent annually; spending amounted to about $40 billion in 2006." The CBO report noted that BPCIA would reduce total expenditures on biologics by $0.2 billion over the 2009-2013 period and by about $25 billion over the 2009-2018 period. (Over that 10-year period, such savings would equal roughly 0.5 percent of national spending on prescription drugs, valued at wholesale prices.) The report estimated that as a result of the BPCIA, direct spending by the federal government would decrease by $46 million over 2009-2013 period, and by $5.9 billion over the SB 671 Page 6 2009-2018 period. A November 2014 RAND study similarly identified a $44.2 billion reduction in direct spending on biologic drugs from 2014 to 2024, or about 4 percent of total biologic spending over the same period, with a range of $13 billion to $66 billion. In the past two years, at least twenty-three states have considered, or are in the process of considering, legislation similar to this measure that outlines procedures by which a pharmacist may substitute a prescribed biologic drug for a biosimilar. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: Yes SUPPORT: (Verified5/19/15) AIM at Melanoma Alliance for Patient Access Alliance of Specialty Medicine which includes the American Academy of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Mohs Surgery, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Coalition of State Rheumatology Organizations, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, North American Spine Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and Society for Excellence in Eyecare American Cancer Society Amgen Arthritis Foundation Association of Northern California Oncologists Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) BIOCOM California Healthcare Institute California Rheumatology Alliance Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America Express Scripts Genentech Hospira International Cancer Advocacy Network Johnson & Johnson Kidney Cancer Association SB 671 Page 7 Lilly USA Medical Oncology Association of Southern California Merck National Black Nurses Association National Kidney Foundation Novartis Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Sandoz Sanofi State Building and Construction Trades Council UCB, Inc. U.S. Pain Foundation OPPOSITION: (Verified5/18/15) Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy America's Health Insurance Plans California Association of Health Plans California Pharmacists Association California Retailers Association CVS Health Kaiser Permanente National Community Pharmacists Association National Association of Chain Drug Stores Pharmaceutical Care Management Association Walgreens ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Supporters believe that this bill addresses key policy issues to ensure patient safety is preserved, including physician authority to prevent substitutions and ensuring that the treating physician is notified if another version of the biologic medicine is substituted for the version prescribed by the doctor. Supporters state that California law already addresses the process pharmacists must follow to substitute traditional, generic drugs for their branded equivalent and this bill would create a similar process for substituting a branded biologic drug with a biosimilar drug the FDA has designated as interchangeable. According to supporters, this bill ensures that all biologics are treated equally in California and ensures SB 671 Page 8 that all patients taking biologic medicines are afforded the same patient protections. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: Opponents believe that pharmacists will not be able to comply with provisions in the bill related to communication to a prescriber about the substitution of a bioloigical product for an alternative biological product, that the bill creates hurdles that would discourage the dispensing of biosimilar products and that any communication potentially delaying prescriber or patient acceptance or creating doubt as to the safety and/or efficacy of FDA-approved interchangeable biosimilars is wholly unnecessary and a disservice to patients and payers in the U.S. Opponents also state that notifications in this bill are unnecessary and will prevent cost savings to patients and employers that can be achieved with the use of interchangeable biosimilar medications. According to opponents, most pharmacies expected to dispense interchangeable biologics are specialty pharmacies that dispense high complexity, high cost products for patients with complex medical conditions to physician offices or clinics where these can be administered, rather than dispensing to patients and the system outlined in this bill permitting communication to a prescriber would in fact be unavailable for these settings, the majority of pharmacies dispensing interchangeables. Opponents also believe that this bill creates a false impression about the safety of biologics, will hinder their use and creates unnecessary burdens Prepared by:Janelle Miyashiro / B., P. & E.D. / (916) 651-4104, Sarah Mason / B., P. & E.D. / (916) 651-4104 5/21/15 9:03:55 **** END ****