BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 671 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 19, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair SB 671 (Hill) - As Amended July 16, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Business and Professions |Vote:|14 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | |Health | |18 - 0 | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill authorizes a pharmacist to substitute an alternative biological product (biosimilar) when filling a prescription for a prescribed biological product if a biosimilar is designated as interchangeable with the reference product, among other SB 671 Page 2 conditions, and communication is provided to the patient and physician that a substitution was made. It also requires the Board of Pharmacy (Board) to maintain a link on its Website to the list of biological products recognized as interchangeable by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FISCAL EFFECT: 1)Minor and absorbable additional costs to BOP (Pharmacy Fund). 2)Contingent on future federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of biosimilars, biosimilar substitution could result in significant future savings in state health programs (primarily Medi-Cal, CalPERS, and correctional health). Like generic versions of brand-name drugs, biosimilars are likely to be lower in cost than brand-name biologics. Given that the FDA's approval process has not been finalized and no interchangeable biosimilars are available, it is difficult to precisely estimate when and to what extent potential savings from biosimilar substitutions will accrue. Actual savings will depend on the biosimilar penetration rate and the cost difference between biosimilars and reference products. However, given plausible estimates of these variables, it is reasonable to assume cost savings to the state could eventually be in the tens of millions of dollars annually. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. This bill seeks to establish conditions under which biosimilar substitution can take place. It appears a law change is necessary to allow pharmacies to substitute SB 671 Page 3 biosimilars deemed interchangeable with prescribed biologic products. In addition, proponents believe the future allowance of such substitution based on findings of interchangeability warrants careful tracking and communication to patients and prescribers about whether the prescription was filled with the prescribed biologic or an interchangeable biosimilar. 2)Biologics and Biosimilars. According to the FDA, biological products (biologics) can include a wide range of products including vaccines, blood and blood components, gene therapy, tissues, and proteins. Federal law defines "biosimilar" as a biological product that is highly similar to a U.S.-licensed reference biological product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and for which there are no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of the safety, purity, and potency of the product. Unlike most prescription drugs, biologics are generally made from living materials and have complex molecular structures. Whereas generic versions of prescription drugs can be verified as chemically "bioequivalent" to brand-name drugs, the complex structure of biologics makes it more challenging to identify generic versions. Additionally, until recently, FDA did not have the authority to license biosimilars based on a comparison to a reference product already approved as safe and effective. Federal legislation in 2010 created an abbreviated licensure pathway for biosimilars-much like the abbreviated pathway for generic drug development. The FDA has begun to issue guidance pursuant to this act, but regulations on naming and interchangeability have not been issued. 3)Interchangeability. Federal law establishes a more rigorous standard of "interchangeable biosimilar"-a drug that is both biosimilar and can be expected to produce the same clinical result as the reference product in any given patient, among other safeguards. Federal law provides that, once approved, SB 671 Page 4 an interchangeable biosimilar may be substituted for the reference product without the intervention of the health care provider who prescribed the reference product. Consistent with federal law, this bill allows substitution only for biosimilars deemed interchangeable. 4)Cost Savings. Reports cited by the Government Accountability Office as part of a comprehensive review of the costs savings attributable to generic drugs found that generic substitution has saved the U.S. health care system more than $1 trillion in the 12-year period 1999 through 2010. Various sources estimate biosimilars will be priced at a 20% to 50% discount from the price of reference products. 5)Support. Pharmaceutical companies and their trade groups support this bill because it includes patient protections that recognize the unique attributes of biosimilar products. Patient advocacy groups support this bill because bringing alternate biological products to market will reduce high patient drug costs. 6)Opposition. Health plans and insurers oppose this bill. They indicate it is premature to establish a state regulatory regime for biosimilars at this time, given FDA has not yet established the standards biosimilars need to meet for interchangeability. They believe state lawmakers should review FDA rules before deciding whether any restrictions are necessary. 7)Previous Legislation. SB 598 (Hill) of 2013 was substantially similar to this bill. The bill was vetoed by Governor Brown who noted that "CalPERS and other large purchasers warn that the [notification] requirement itself would cast doubt on the safety and desirability of more cost-effective alternatives to biologics. The FDA, which has jurisdiction for approving all drugs, has not yet determined what standards will be required SB 671 Page 5 for biosimilars to meet the higher threshold for "interchangeability." This bill does not appear to address the veto message, as the FDA still has not defined interchangeability standards. AB 1139 (Lowenthal), which was never heard, was similar to this bill. Analysis Prepared by:Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081