BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 680|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 680
Author: Wieckowski (D), et al.
Amended: 1/26/16
Vote: 21
SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 9-0, 4/21/15
AYES: Beall, Cannella, Allen, Bates, Galgiani, Leyva, McGuire,
Roth, Wieckowski
NO VOTE RECORDED: Gaines, Mendoza
SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 5-2, 5/6/15
AYES: Hertzberg, Beall, Hernandez, Moorlach, Pavley
NOES: Nguyen, Lara
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 6-1, 1/21/16
AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Mendoza, Nielsen
NOES: Leyva
SUBJECT: Sales taxes: exemption: motor vehicles
SOURCE: Author
DIGEST: This bill exempts from sales taxes any new car bought
in California by a non-resident which is permanently moved and
used outside of California within 30 days. These provisions
sunset on January 1, 2020.
ANALYSIS: Existing law subjects a vehicle purchase in
California to California sales tax at the location at which the
transaction takes place, regardless of whether the purchaser
moves the vehicle outside the state.
SB 680
Page 2
This bill exempts from sales tax the purchase of a new vehicle
by a non-resident if the purchaser moves the vehicle out of
state within 30 days, receives a one-trip permit from the
Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), and receives an exemption
certificate from the Board of Equalization.
Comments
1)Purpose. According to the author, this bill is necessary to
eliminate a disincentive for purchasing a car in California.
Under current law, a non-resident who purchases a vehicle in
California has to pay California sales tax on the purchase
even though the car is being used and registered in the state
where the purchaser resides. The purchaser would also owe
sales tax to the state where the new car was registered.
While this would be offset by the California sales tax, there
is some risk that the offset wouldn't be sufficient to cover
the California tax, according to the author.
In addition, several states, such as Texas, have prohibited
Tesla from selling its cars directly to customers. Tesla's
Texas customers then have to buy their cars out of state and
drive or ship them in. The author is hoping that some of
those customers will come to tour the Tesla factory in Fremont
to complete their purchase and then spend some time visiting
other parts of the state. Customers of some high-end vehicles
do just that in Europe.
2)Non-California users ineligible for California incentives.
California has a number of programs to encourage the purchase
of low- and zero-emission vehicles which are funded by
Californians. This bill makes vehicles which qualify for this
sales tax exemption ineligible for the California Clean
Vehicle Rebate Program, the carpool lane decal program, and
any other electric vehicle incentive program offered by the
state.
3)Cars only. This bill is intended to deal only with
automobiles. Other vehicles, such as motorcycles and
motorhomes, are excluded.
4)Sunset. The provisions of this bill sunset on January 1,
2020.
SB 680
Page 3
5)Immediate effect. As a tax levy, this bill is effective
immediately.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.:YesLocal: No
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this bill's
revenue impact relative to current law is completely dependent
upon future taxpayer behavior, and is thus unknown. However,
based on historical experience, this bill could reduce annual
sales tax revenue by up to $25,000 annually ($12,000 General
Fund). Implementation costs to the Board of Equalization would
be minor and absorbable.
SUPPORT: (Verified1/25/16)
Tesla
OPPOSITION: (Verified1/25/16)
None received
Prepared by:Randy Chinn / T. & H. / (916) 651-4121
1/26/16 16:39:28
**** END ****
SB 680
Page 4