BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 693


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          693 (Hueso)


          As Amended  June 27, 2016


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  31-1


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Labor           |6-1  |Roger Hernández, Chu, |Patterson           |
          |                |     |Linder, McCarty,      |                    |
          |                |     |O'Donnell, Thurmond   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |16-4 |Gonzalez, Bloom,      |Bigelow, Jones,     |
          |                |     |Bonilla, Bonta,       |Obernolte, Wagner   |
          |                |     |Calderon, Chang,      |                    |
          |                |     |Daly, Eggman,         |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher,            |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,       |                    |
          |                |     |Holden, Quirk,        |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Weber,      |                    |
          |                |     |Wood, Chau            |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |








                                                                     SB 693


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Consolidates "skilled and trained workforce"  
          requirements of various provisions of existing law related to  
          alternative construction delivery methods, and makes other  
          changes.  Specifically, this bill:


          1)Authorizes a public entity to require a bidder, contractor or  
            other entity to use a "skilled and trained workforce" to  
            complete a contract or project regardless of whether the  
            public entity is required to do so by a statute or regulation.


          2)Deletes various provisions of exiting law and instead  
            establishes a new comprehensive section of the Public Contract  
            Code applicable whenever a public entity is required by  
            statute or regulation to obtain an enforceable commitment that  
            a bidder, contractor, or other entity will use a "skilled and  
            trained workforce" to complete a contract or project, with the  
            following provisions:


             a)   Defines a "skilled and trained workforce" to mean a  
               workforce that meets all of the following conditions:


               i)     All the workers performing work in an apprenticeable  
                 occupation in the building and construction trades are  
                 either skilled journeypersons or apprentices registered  
                 in a state-approved apprenticeship program.


               ii)    For work performed on or after January 1, 2017, at  
                 least 30% of the skilled journeypersons are graduates of  
                 an apprenticeship program, as specified.









                                                                     SB 693


                                                                    Page  3






               iii)   For work performed on or after January 1, 2018, at  
                 least 40% of the skilled journeypersons are graduates of  
                 an apprenticeship program, as specified.


               iv)    For work performed on or after January 1, 2019, at  
                 least 50% of the skilled journeypersons are graduates of  
                 an apprenticeship program, as specified.


               v)     For work performed on or after January 1, 2020, at  
                 least 60% of the skilled journeypersons are graduates of  
                 an apprenticeship program, as specified.


             b)   Defines "graduate of an apprenticeship program" to mean  
               either of the following:


               i)     The individual has been issued a certificate of  
                 completion under the authority of the California  
                 Apprenticeship Council for completing an approved  
                 apprenticeship program.


               ii)    The individual completed an apprenticeship program  
                 located outside California and approved for federal  
                 purposes, as specified.


             c)   Provides that the apprenticeship graduation requirements  
               are satisfied if, in a particular calendar month, either of  
               the following is true:


               i)     At least the required of skilled journeypersons  
                 employed by the contractor or subcontractor meet the  
                 graduation percentage requirement.








                                                                     SB 693


                                                                    Page  4







               ii)    For the hours of work performed by skilled  
                 journeypersons employed by the contractor or  
                 subcontractor, the percentage of hours performed by  
                 skilled journeypersons who met the graduation requirement  
                 is at least equal to the required graduation percentage.


             d)   Provides that the contractor or subcontractor need not  
               meet the apprenticeship graduation requirements if, during  
               the calendar month the contractor or subcontractor employs  
               skilled journeypersons to perform fewer than 10 hours of  
               work on the contract or project.


             e)   Provides that a subcontractor need not meet the  
               apprenticeship graduation requirements if both of the  
               following are true:


               i)     The subcontractor was not listed as a subcontractor  
                 or a substitute for a listed subcontractor.


               ii)    The subcontract does not exceed one-half of 1% of  
                 the price of the prime contract.


             f)   Provides that when a contractor, bidder, or other entity  
               is required to provide an enforceable commitment that a  
               skilled and trained workforce will be used, the commitment  
               shall be made in an enforceable agreement that provides  
               specified provisions, including a monthly report  
               demonstrating compliance with these requirements, which  
               shall be a public record.


             g)   Provides that if the entity fails to provide the monthly  








                                                                     SB 693


                                                                    Page  5





               report, the public agency or other awarding body shall  
               withhold further payment until a complete report is  
               provided.


             h)   Provides that if a monthly report does not demonstrate  
               compliance with these requirements, the public agency or  
               other awarding body shall withhold further payments until  
               the entity provides a plan to achieve substantial  
               compliance prior to completion of the contract or project.


             i)   Provides that these requirements shall not apply if any  
               of the following is true:


               i)     The entity has entered into a project labor  
                 agreement that will bind all contractors and  
                 subcontractors performing work on the project or contract  
                 to use a skilled and trained workforce and the entity  
                 agrees to be bound by that project labor agreement.


               ii)    The project or contract is being performed under the  
                 extension or renewal of a project labor agreement that  
                 was entered into by the entity prior to January 1, 2017.


               iii)   The entity has entered into a project labor  
                 agreement that will bind the entity and all its  
                 subcontractors at every tier to use a skilled and trained  
                 workforce.


          3)Amends provisions of existing law related to construction and  
            related work performed by contract at specified stationary  
            sources (petroleum refineries and petrochemical manufacturing  
            facilities) to do the following:
             a)   Specify that those provisions to not preclude the use of  








                                                                     SB 693


                                                                    Page  6





               an alternative workweek schedule adopted pursuant to  
               existing law.
             b)   Incorporate the same definition of "graduate of an  
               apprenticeship program" described above.


             c)   Make other technical changes.


          4)Provides that the amendments made by this bill shall not apply  
            to contracts that were advertised for bid or awarded before  
            January 1, 2017.
          5)Provides that for contracts advertised for bid or awarded  
            before January 1, 2017, for which an entity or contractor  
            provided an enforceable commitment regarding the use of a  
            skilled and trained workforce, the entity may grant a request  
            by the entity or contractor to instead comply with the  
            requirements of this bill.


          6)Makes related legislative findings and declarations.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, this bill would result in administrative costs to the  
          Division of Apprenticeship Standards (DAS) of approximately  
          $123,000 in the first year and $116,000 ongoing (special funds),  
          to respond to skilled workforce requirement inquires.


          COMMENTS:  This bill is sponsored by the State Building and  
          Construction Trades Council, who states that it is intended to  
          unify the state statutes regarding a "skilled and trained  
          workforce" for public construction contracts using certain  
          alternative delivery methods.  They contend that this bill will  
          consolidate the statutes, ease compliance and implementation  
          issues, such as establishing streamlined reporting requirements  
          and clarifications to enforcement provisions.  They argue that  
          consolidation of the statutes will provide uniformity and will  








                                                                     SB 693


                                                                    Page  7





          ensure the statute can be appropriately amended in the future  
          should there be any changes needed.


          Similarly, the Coalition for Adequate School Housing (CASH)  
          supports this bill, stating that it will clarify the  
          relationship between project labor agreements and the skilled  
          workforce requirements for design-build, best-value, and  
          lease-leaseback school facility projects.  The bill also makes  
          these provisions consistent for all three of the project  
          methods.  They argue that these changes will assist school  
          districts with clarification to appropriately implement these  
          school construction methods.


          Opponents contend that provisions of the bill related to project  
          labor agreements create "loopholes" for evading the skilled and  
          trained workforce requirements of prior legislation.  They  
          contend that if the use of a skilled and trained workforce is  
          truly a value to contracting, then it should apply to all  
          construction of a particular type and not exempt certain  
          projects simply because of the existence of a project labor  
          agreement.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091  FN:  
          0003704

















                                                                     SB 693


                                                                    Page  8