BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 697


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          697 (Hertzberg)


          As Amended July 8, 2015


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  36-0


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Utilities       |13-0 |Rendon, Patterson,    |                    |
          |                |     |Achadjian, Bonilla,   |                    |
          |                |     |Burke, Dahle, Eggman, |                    |
          |                |     |Cristina Garcia,      |                    |
          |                |     |Hadley, Obernolte,    |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago, Ting |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0 |Gomez, Bigelow,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonta,         |                    |
          |                |     |Calderon, Chang,      |                    |
          |                |     |Daly, Eggman,         |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher,            |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,       |                    |
          |                |     |Holden, Jones, Quirk, |                    |








                                                                     SB 697


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Rendon, Wagner,       |                    |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood           |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Repeals the California Public Utilities Commission's  
          (CPUC) requirement to issue a decal to charter party carriers  
          (CPC) and makes technical changes to the Public Utilities Code  
          relating to reporting requirements.  Specifically, this bill: 


          1)Repeals the CPUC's requirement to issue a suitable decal for  
            each vehicle registered with the CPUC and operated by a CPC,  
            holding a valid permit or certificate of public convenience  
            and necessity, for motor vehicles designed to carry no more  
            than eight passengers, including the driver. 


          2)Consolidates and makes technical changes to the Public  
            Utilities Code relating to reporting requirements. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, this bill would have potential minor savings up to  
          $30,000 to the Public Utilities Commission Transportation  
          Reimbursement Account for reduced workload associated with  
          issuing decals. 


          COMMENTS:  


          1)Author's Statement:  "[This bill] eliminates antiquated CPUC  
            decal requirements; SB 697 makes California law clearer and  
            easier to abide by for limousine and other passenger carriers  
            and for law enforcement to uphold.  [In addition, this bill]  
            consolidates and clarifies the CPUC's statutory reporting  








                                                                     SB 697


                                                                    Page  3





            requirements; SB 697 makes California law clearer and easier  
            to understand and track all CPUC reports."


          2)Background:  Current law requires CPCs to display a decal, as  
            well as a distinctive identifying symbol issued by the CPUC.   
            Previously CPCs were allowed to obtain special "livery"  
            license plates in lieu of a decal.  When livery plates were  
            eliminated under SB 611 (Hill), Chapter 860, Statutes of 2014,  
            stakeholders thought that the distinctive identifying symbol  
            issued by the CPUC also satisfied the requirement to display a  
            decal.  The CPUC has not issued, nor has it produced, any  
            decals in over two decades.  


            Due to the conflicting nature of the statutes, this bill would  
            repeal the CPUC requirement to issue a suitable decal for CPC  
            vehicles, hence, leaving only the requirement that CPCs must  
            display a CPUC-issued distinctive identifying symbol.


          3)Consolidating Reporting Requirements in the Public Utilities  
            Code:  This bill also makes technical changes to the Public  
            Utilities Code by consolidating and clarifying statutory  
            reporting requirements under one section of the Public  
            Utilities Code.  The CPUC is required by statute to prepare  
            and publish numerous reports on a wide range of subjects  
            within its jurisdiction.  The reporting requirements are  
            typically codified in separate sections within the Public  
            Utilities Code.  Consolidating the reporting requirements in a  
            single area of the Code will assist tracking and compliance.  


          Analysis Prepared by:  Edmond Cheung / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083   
            FN: 0001743












                                                                     SB 697


                                                                    Page  4