BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 703  


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  July 15, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          SB 703  
          (Leno) - As Amended June 1, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Accountability and             |Vote:|6 - 3        |
          |Committee:   |Administrative Review          |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  YesReimbursable:   
          No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill prohibits state agencies from entering into certain  
          contracts with a contractor that discriminates between their  
          employees on the basis of gender identity. Specifically, this  








                                                                     SB 703  


                                                                    Page  2





          bill:


          1)Prohibits state agencies from entering into contracts  
            exceeding $100,000 for goods or services with a contractor  
            that, in the provision of benefits, discriminates between  
            employees on the basis of an employee's or dependent's actual  
            or perceived gender identity, including identification as  
            transgender.


          2)Provides specific exceptions to the contracting requirement in  
            (1), including when there is only one prospective contractor  
            willing to enter into a contract with the state or as  
            necessary to respond to an emergency situation.


          3)Requires every contract subject to (1) to include a statement  
            for the contractor to certify compliance with the requirement  
            in (1). A contractor falsely certifying compliance shall be  
            subject to certain penalties and remedies unless, within a  
            time period specified by DGS or other state contracting  
            agency, the contractor provides proof that it has complied or  
            is in the process of complying.


          4)Requires the Department of General Services (DGS) to maintain  
            an easily accessible list on its website of contracts for the  
            acquisition of goods or services in the amount $100,000 or  
            more that are entered into on or after January 1, 2016.


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)By adding contracting requirements on bidders, the bill would  
            to some extent reduce the number of bidders on state  
            contracts, thus reducing competition and possibly increasing  
            costs. The cost of these impacts is unknown, but given that  








                                                                     SB 703  


                                                                    Page  3





            the state contracts for several billion dollars for goods and  
            services exceeding $100,000 annually, costs could be in the  
            hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars annually.  
            [General Fund and numerous special funds] Over time, assuming  
            more contractors come into compliance, the cost impact of this  
            bill would diminish. 


          2)DGS would incur minor one-time administrative costs to update  
            standard contract terms, and minor absorbable costs to include  
            the listing of contracts on its website.


          


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. According to the author's office, this bill is simply  
            intended to prohibit state agencies from doing business with  
            companies that discriminate between the benefits offered to  
            transgender employees and other employees.  The author's  
            office notes that discrimination in the provision of employee  
            benefits has a tremendous economic cost impact.  For example,  
            when workers are denied health coverage or are excluded from  
            medically necessary procedures, costs are pushed on to state  
            funded programs and services.  One mechanism that has been  
            used to combat these costs, and to reduce discrimination, is  
            the state's market power through the contracting it does with  
            the private sector.


          2)Prior Legislation. This bill is modeled after AB 17 (Kehoe),  
            Chapter 752, Statutes of 2003, which prohibited state  
            contracts with firms that discriminate, in the provision of  
            benefits, between employees with spouses and employees with  
            registered domestic partners.









                                                                     SB 703  


                                                                    Page  4






          3)Comment. Since the state's FI$Cal public transparency website  
            will list all contracts for goods and services and will enable  
            users to run search queries, including queries for contracts  
            over $100,000, it seems unnecessary to require DGS to post,  
            and continually update, information that members of the public  
            could obtain on their own through FI$CAL. 


          Analysis Prepared by:Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081