BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 705| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 705 Author: Hill (D), et al. Amended: 9/3/15 Vote: 21 PRIOR VOTES NOT RELEVANT SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 7-2, 9/11/15 (pursuant to Senate Rules 29.10) AYES: Beall, Cannella, Allen, Leyva, McGuire, Mendoza, Wieckowski NOES: Bates, Gaines NO VOTE RECORDED: Galgiani, Roth ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 51-29, 9/10/15 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Transactions and use taxes: County of San Mateo: Transportation Agency for Monterey County SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill authorizes Monterey and San Mateo Counties to impose a countywide sales tax for transportation purposes that would, in combination with all other locally imposed sales tax, exceed the 2% tax rate cap if certain requirements are met. Assembly Amendments remove the original contents of the bill related to charter school facilities and replace it with the current language. ANALYSIS: Existing law: SB 705 Page 2 1)Authorizes cities and counties to impose transactions and use taxes in 0.125% increments in addition to the state's 7.5% sales tax, provided that the combined rate in the county does not exceed 2%. 2)Exempts the Counties of Los Angeles, Alameda, and Contra Costa from the 2% combined tax rate cap for countywide transportation programs. 3)Contains the Bay Area County Traffic and Transportation Funding Act, which authorizes the nine Bay Area counties, including San Mateo County, to establish a 0.5 or 1% sales tax for specified transportation purposes if the ordinance levying the tax meets the state's sales tax laws and is approved by a two-thirds vote. This bill: 1)Authorizes San Mateo County to impose a countywide sales tax at a rate of no more than 0.5% for transportation purposes that will, in combination with all other locally imposed sales tax, exceed the 2% tax rate cap as long as it otherwise conforms to the Bay Area County Traffic and Transportation Funding Act. 2)Authorizes Monterey County to impose a countywide sales tax at a rate of no more than 0.375% for transportation purposes that would, in combination with all other locally-imposed sales tax, exceed the 2% tax rate cap if all of the following requirements are met: a) The Transportation Agency for Monterey County adopts an ordinance proposing the transactions and use tax by an applicable voting approval requirement; b) The ordinance proposing the transactions and use tax is submitted to the electorate and is approved by the voters voting on the ordinance in accordance with California Constitution Article XIII C; and c) The transactions and use tax conforms to the Transactions and Use Tax Law, as specified. SB 705 Page 3 3)Repeals either provision of this bill if voters of either county do not approve a proposed tax increase authorized by this bill before January 1, 2026. Comments Purpose. According to the author, the 2% cap is particularly problematic for counties because if one city within a county reaches the cap, then the county is precluded from seeking voter approval to self-impose additional countywide taxes. Both San Mateo and Monterey Counties have significant transportation needs that cannot be addressed without more local revenue, but both suffer under the 2% ceiling. This bill affords each county the flexibility to place items before the voters to fund local transportation programs. Transactions and use taxes. As stated earlier, existing law authorizes cities and counties to impose transactions and use taxes (generally called sales taxes) in 0.125% increments in addition to the state's 7.5% sales tax, provided that the combined rate in the county does not exceed 2%. These types of taxes may be levied as general taxes (majority vote required), which are unrestricted, or special taxes (two-thirds vote required), which are restricted for a specified use. The Transactions and Use Tax law authorizes the adoption of local add-on rates to the combined state and local sales tax rate. The law has been amended multiple times to authorize specific cities, counties, special districts, and county transportation authorities to impose a sales tax upon voter approval. Prior to 2003, cities lacked the ability to place sales tax measures before their voters without first obtaining approval by the Legislature to bring an ordinance before the city council, and, if approved at the council level, to the voters. This was remedied by SB 566 (Scott, Chapter 709, Statutes of 2003). SB 566 also contained provisions to increase a county's sales tax cap because of the possibility that certain counties were going to run out of room under their caps, if cities within those counties approved additional sales taxes. Because of the interaction between city-imposed and SB 705 Page 4 county-imposed sales taxes, the concern that counties will run into the 2% cap still applies today. Currently, the Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, and San Mateo have reached the 2% limit, and the counties of Marin, San Diego, and Sonoma are near the 2% limit. Exemptions to the 2% cap. The Legislature has previously granted exemptions to the 2% statutory cap for sales taxes to support countywide transportation programs for Los Angeles, Alameda, and Contra Costa Counties. AB 1086 (Wieckowski, Chapter 327, Statutes of 2011) allowed a one-time exemption for Alameda County from the 2% sales tax combined rate cap. AB 210 (Wieckowski, Chapter 194, Statutes of 2013) extended the authority for Alameda County to adopt an ordinance imposing a sales tax for transportation purposes from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, and allowed Contra Costa County to adopt an ordinance imposing a sales tax in the same manner as Alameda County. SB 314 (Murray, Chapter 785, Statutes of 2003) originally enacted provisions that authorized the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to impose a 0.5% sales tax, not subject to the 2% cap for no more than six and one-half years, for specific transportation projects and programs. The authority to put a tax measure on the ballot was never used. AB 2321 (Feuer, Chapter 302, Statutes of 2008) modified those provisions to allow MTA to impose a sales tax for 30 years. SB 767 (De León), pending on the Assembly Floor, and AB 338 (Hernández), pending in the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee, would both authorize MTA to impose an additional countywide 0.5% sales tax. Additionally, AB 1324 (Skinner, Chapter 795, Statutes of 2014) allowed the City of El Cerrito to adopt an ordinance to impose a transactions and use tax not to exceed 0.5% for general purposes that would, in combination with other taxes, exceed the statutory limit of 2%. Governor's veto. Instead of doing individual bills for each county in California, this year's AB 464 (Mullin) would have increased the countywide sales tax combined rate cap from 2% to SB 705 Page 5 3% statewide. On August 17, the Governor vetoed AB 464. In his veto message, the Governor remarked, "Although I have approved raising the limit for individual counties, I am reluctant to approve this measure in view of all the taxes being discussed and proposed for the 2016 ballot." FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:NoLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified9/10/15) California State Association of Counties City of Carmel-by-the-Sea City of Del Rey Oaks City of Gonzales City of Greenfield City of King City of Marina City of Monterey City of Pacific Grove City of Salinas City of Sand City City of Seaside City of Soledad Monterey County Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board San Mateo County Transit District San Mateo County Transportation Authority Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Transportation Agency for Monterey County OPPOSITION: (Verified9/11/15) California Taxpayers Association ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 51-29, 9/10/15 AYES: Alejo, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, SB 705 Page 6 Campos, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Roger Hernández, Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Lopez, Low, McCarty, Medina, Mullin, Nazarian, O'Donnell, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Weber, Williams, Wood, Atkins NOES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Brough, Chang, Chávez, Dahle, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Irwin, Jones, Kim, Lackey, Linder, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, Melendez, Obernolte, Olsen, Patterson, Steinorth, Wagner, Waldron, Wilk Prepared by:Eric Thronson / T. & H. / (916) 651-4121 9/11/15 14:29:01 **** END ****