BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 707| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: SB 707 Author: Wolk (D), et al. Amended: 5/4/15 Vote: 21 SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE: 4-2, 4/14/15 AYES: Hancock, Leno, McGuire, Monning NOES: Anderson, Stone NO VOTE RECORDED: Liu SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 5/28/15 AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen SUBJECT: Firearms: gun-free school zone SOURCE: California College and University Police Chiefs Association DIGEST: This bill (1) allows a person holding a valid license to carry a concealed firearm to carry a firearm in an area that is within 1,000 feet of, but not on the grounds of, a public or private school providing instruction in kindergarten or grades 1 to 12; and, (2) deletes the exemption that allows a person holding a valid license to carry a concealed firearm to possess a firearm on the campus of a university or college. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Creates the Gun-Free School Zone Act of 1995. (Penal Code § 626.9(a).) SB 707 Page 2 2)Defines a "school zone" to means an area in, or on the grounds of, a public or private school providing instruction in kindergarten or grades 1 to 12, or within a distance of 1,000 feet from the grounds of the public or private school. (Penal Code § 626.9(e).) 3)States that any person who possesses a firearm in a place that the person knows, or reasonably should know, is a school zone, unless it is with the written permission of the school district superintendent, or equivalent school authority, is subject to punishment, as specified. (Penal Code § 626.9(f)-(i).) 4)States, pursuant to Penal Code § 626.9(c), that the Gun-Free School Zone Act of 1995 does not apply to possession of a firearm under any of the following circumstances: a) Within a place of residence or place of business or on private property, if the place of residence, place of business, or private property is not part of the school grounds and the possession of the firearm is otherwise lawful. b) When the firearm is an unloaded pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed on the person and is in a locked container or within the locked trunk of a motor vehicle. c) The lawful transportation of any other firearm, other than a pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed on the person, in accordance with state law. d) When the person possessing the firearm reasonably believes that he or she is in grave danger because of circumstances forming the basis of a current restraining order issued by a court against another person or persons who has or have been found to pose a threat to his or her life or safety, as specified. e) When the person is exempt from the prohibition against carrying a concealed firearm, as specified. 5)States, pursuant to Penal Code § 626.9(l), that the Gun-Free SB 707 Page 3 School Zone Act of 1995 does not apply to: a) A duly appointed peace officer. b) A full-time paid peace officer of another state or the federal government who is carrying out official duties while in California. c) Any person summoned by any of these officers to assist in making arrests or preserving the peace while he or she is actually engaged in assisting the officer. d) A member of the military forces of this state or of the United States who is engaged in the performance of his or her duties. e) A person holding a valid license to carry a concealed firearm. f) An armored vehicle guard, engaged in the performance of his or her duties, as specified. g) A security guard authorized to carry a loaded firearm. h) An honorably retired peace officer authorized to carry a concealed or loaded firearm. i) An existing shooting range at a public or private school or university or college campus. This bill: 1)Allows a person holding a valid license to carry a concealed firearm to carry a firearm in an area that is within 1,000 feet of, but not on the grounds of, a public or private school providing instruction in kindergarten or grades 1 to 12. 2)Deletes the exemption that allows a person holding a valid license to carry a concealed firearm to possess a firearm on the campus of a university or college. Background Individuals who possess a valid concealed carry permit are SB 707 Page 4 currently allowed to carry a firearm on school campuses, including grade schools, high schools and college campuses. This bill prohibits this group from carrying firearms on school grounds, but allows them to carry firearms within 1,000 feet of a school. This bill does, however, maintain the ability of a school district superintendent, or equivalent school authority, to provide a person with written permission to carry a firearm on school grounds. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: Yes According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: Potential future increase in state costs (General Fund), likely minor, to the extent narrowing and deleting exemptions from the Gun-Free School Zone Act result in additional violations of the Act and subsequent state prison commitments. The CDCR indicates no more than 10 new commitments per year over the last two years. However, future annual cumulative costs for even one or two commitments over two years would exceed $50,000 to $100,000 (General Fund) assuming an 18-month average length of stay. Potential future increase in non-reimbursable local costs (Local Fund) for enforcement and additional felony or misdemeanor jail terms, to the extent narrowing and deleting exemptions from the Gun-Free School Zone Act result in additional violations of the Act. SUPPORT: (Verified 5/28/15) California College and University Police Chiefs Association (source) Association of California School Administrators Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence (California Chapters) California Correctional Supervisors Organization California Narcotics Officers California Police Chiefs Association California School Boards Association California School Employees Association SB 707 Page 5 California State University Coalition Against Gun Violence, Santa Barbara County County of Santa Barbara Courage Campaign Davis College Democrats Davis Joint Unified School District Fraternal Order of Police, California State Lodge Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence Long Beach Police Officers Association Los Angeles Police Protective League Los Angeles County Probation Officers Union Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Association Los Angeles Unified School District Peace Officers Research Association Physicians for Social Responsibility Retired and Disabled Police of America Riverside Sheriffs' Association Sacramento County Deputy Sheriffs' Association Santa Ana Police Officers Association University of California, Office of the President Violence Prevention Coalition Women Against Gun Violence Youth Alive! OPPOSITION: (Verified 5/28/15) Calguns Foundation California Rifle and Pistol Association, Inc. Firearms Policy Coalition Gun Owners of California National Rifle Association 5 individuals ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The California Chapters of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence states, with regard to the February 27, 2015 version of this bill: Existing law prohibits a person from possessing a firearm in a school zone without the written permission of certain school district officials. A school zone includes school grounds and a distance within 1,000 feet of a public or private K-12 school. Additionally, existing law prohibits a person from possessing a firearm upon the grounds of a public or private university or college campus without the written permission of SB 707 Page 6 specified university or college officials. Persons holding a valid license to carry a concealed and loaded weapon (CCW) and retired peace officers authorized to carry concealed and loaded firearms are exempt from the school zone and university or college prohibitions. SB 707 would allow CCW license holders to carry a concealed firearm within 1,000 feet but not on the grounds of a K-12 school and not on the campus of a university or college. Firearms, including concealed loaded handguns, could still be allowed on school grounds or campuses with the permission of school officials. The Brady Campaign strongly believes that the discretion to allow concealed, loaded guns on a school grounds and college or university campuses must lie with school authorities, who bear the responsibility for the wellbeing and safety of their students. Under existing law, county sheriffs issue CCW permits and thereby determine who may carry a concealed, loaded gun on school grounds or campuses. This creates the opportunity for a 21 year old from a rural county to obtain a CCW permit and carry a loaded, hidden handgun in a dormitory on an urban campus. This is one area of firearm law in which California lags behind many other states. According to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, which tracks state firearm laws, 39 states and the District of Columbia prohibit those with CCW permits from possessing concealed firearms within school zones and 23 states specify that CCW permit holders may not carry concealed firearms on college and university campuses. California is not one of these states. The national trend on this issue is disturbing as legislation has been introduced in at least 16 states that would force guns onto college and university campuses. Proponents are even suggesting that more guns on campuses would stop student rape. Additionally, legislation is being pushed in 20 states to allow people to carry hidden, loaded handguns in public without a permit. Moreover, federal reciprocity legislation (H.R. 402 and S. 498) has been introduced that would require states to recognize CCW permits from other states, including those with reprehensibly low standards. States that use law enforcement discretion, such as California, would be forced to recognize CCW permits from other states, even if the permit holder would not pass a background check in the state. The SB 707 Page 7 threat of national CCW reciprocity heightens the importance of SB 707 and the need to remove the exemption that allows CCW license holders to carry guns on school grounds and campuses in California. . . Under SB 707, the number of hidden, loaded firearms legally brought onto school grounds and college campuses will be reduced and the safety of students and others will increase. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: The National Rifle Association states, with regard to the February 27, 2015 version of this bill: Senate Bill 707 amends the California Gun-Free School Zone Act of 1995 to effectively prohibit the possession of firearms by CCW holders and honorably retired law enforcement officers on the grounds of K-12 schools and college campuses. This bill was introduced in the wake of an incident involving vice principal Kent Williams of Tevis Junior High School, who was arrested in 2014 for bringing a firearm onto school property despite possessing a valid CCW license. All criminal charges against him were dropped, and he is now suing the city and the police department for wrongful arrest. Williams v. Bakersfield, No. 14-01955 (E.D.Cal. filed Dec. 8, 2014). Senate Bill 707 would effectively prohibit CCW holders and retired law enforcement officers from possessing firearms on any properties that make up the grounds of a K-12 school or university, including many parking lots, common areas that may not be readily identifiable as school grounds, and student apartment buildings. Due the imprecise language used in current penal code section 626.9, SB 707 will further promote inadvertent violations and unjust prosecutions of otherwise law-abiding firearm owners. This legislation raises significant concerns under the Second Amendment by further infringing the rights of law-abiding- and properly licensed and trained individuals- to possess a firearm for self-defense. From a practical perspective, SB 707 improperly expands prohibitions on the possession of firearms by persons who pose no threat to public safety. In doing so, this legislation would leave these individuals, SB 707 Page 8 and all other persons on California campuses, defenseless against violent criminals that target California schools and universities without regard for these restrictions, barring what a majority of law enforcement officers believe to be the most effective line of defense against mass shootings. Prepared by:Jessica Devencenzi / PUB. S. / 6/1/15 9:46:13 **** END ****