BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 716 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 716 (Lara) As Amended July 16, 2015 Majority vote SENATE VOTE: 29-7 ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Public Safety |4-2 |Jones-Sawyer, Lopez, |Melendez, Lackey | | | |Low, Santiago | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Arts |4-2 |Calderon, Hadley, |Obernolte, Medina | | | |Levine, Nazarian | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |17-0 |Gomez, Bigelow, | | | | |Bloom, Bonta, | | | | |Calderon, Chang, | | | | |Daly, Eggman, | | | | |Gallagher, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Eduardo Garcia, | | | | |Holden, Jones, Quirk, | | SB 716 Page 2 | | |Rendon, Wagner, | | | | |Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY: States that it is misdemeanor for any person who houses, possesses, or is in direct contact with an elephant to use specified devices designed to inflict pain for the purpose of training or controlling the behavior of an elephant. Specifically, this bill: 1)Specifies that on or after January 1, 2018, it shall be a misdemeanor for any person who houses, possesses, or is in direct contact with an elephant to use a bullhook, ankus, baseball bat, axe handle, pitchfork, or similar device designed to inflict pain for the purpose of training or controlling the behavior of an elephant. 2)Prohibits behavior includes brandishing, exhibiting, or displaying any of the devices, listed above, in the presence of an elephant. EXISTING LAW: 1)Specifies that it is a misdemeanor for any owner or manager of an elephant to engage in abusive behavior toward the elephant, including the discipline of the elephant by any of the following methods: a) Deprivation of food, water, or rest. b) Use of electricity. c) Physical punishment resulting in damage, scarring, or SB 716 Page 3 breakage of skin. d) Insertion of any instrument into any bodily orifice. e) Use of martingales. f) Use of block and tackle. 2)Specifies the actions of a person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, tortures, or wounds a living animal, or maliciously and intentionally kills an animal as a criminal offense. 3)Specifies when a person overdrives, overloads, drives when overloaded, overworks, tortures, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, drink, or shelter, cruelly beats, mutilates, or cruelly kills any animal, or causes or procures any animal to be so overdriven, overloaded, driven when overloaded, overworked, tortured, tormented, deprived of necessary sustenance, drink, shelter, or to be cruelly beaten, mutilated, or cruelly killed; and whoever, having the charge or custody of any animal, either as owner or otherwise, subjects any animal to needless suffering, or inflicts unnecessary cruelty upon the animal, or in any manner abuses any animal, or fails to provide the animal with proper food, drink, or shelter or protection from the weather, or who drives, rides, or otherwise uses the animal when unfit for labor as a criminal offense. 4)Requires punishment as a felony by imprisonment pursuant to Penal Code Section 1170(h), or by a fine of not more than $20,000, or by both that fine and imprisonment, or alternatively, as a misdemeanor by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than $20,000, or by both that fine and imprisonment for violations SB 716 Page 4 of Penal Code Section 597 (animal cruelty). 5)Requires that if a defendant is granted probation for a conviction animal cruelty, the court shall order the defendant to pay for, and successfully complete, counseling, as determined by the court, designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders. If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendant's ability to pay. The counseling shall be in addition to any other terms and conditions of probation, including any term of imprisonment and any fine. If the court does not order custody as a condition of probation for a conviction under this section, the court shall specify on the court record the reason or reasons for not ordering custody. This does not apply to cases involving police dogs or horses as described in Penal Code Section 600. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, unknown, probably minor nonreimbursable local law enforcement and incarceration costs, offset to a degree by increased fine revenue. COMMENTS: According to the author, "SB 716 simply codifies industry standards for elephant management by prohibiting the use of bullhooks, bats, and pitchforks to discipline an elephant. A bullhook is typically embedded into most sensitive areas of an elephant, which involves areas around the ears, mouth, and back of the legs. The use of this instrument also puts handlers at severe risk, should an elephant decide to rebel against the trainer. Since 1990, there have been at least 16 human deaths, and 135 injuries in the U.S. [United States] have been attributed to elephants, primarily in circus-related incidents. Simply put, it is time for the State to prohibit SB 716 Page 5 this inhumane practice." Analysis Prepared by: David Billingsley / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744 FN: 0001416