BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 736 Page 1 Date of Hearing: July 15, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair SB 736 (Vidak) - As Amended May 5, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Banking and Finance |Vote:|11 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill requires that, whenever possible, the Commissioner of the Department of Business Oversight (DBO) use the services of private individuals with prior escrow experience to act as conservator, receiver, or liquidator for instances in which the commissioner must take possession of the assets and business of an escrow agent following that agent's insolvency. The bill authorizes the commissioner to use all or a portion of the insolvent escrow agent's surety bond and assets following conversion, as well as redirect up to $125,000 in penalty revenue at any one time, to compensate private conservators, liquidators, and receivers. SB 736 Page 2 FISCAL EFFECT: Potential GF revenue decrease of up to $125,000 per event, from redirection of penalty revenue, additional GF cost to DBO if private conservator, liquidator, or receiver fees exceed $125,000 in a limited period. The redirection of penalty revenue is unlikely to generate $125,000 in any given year as total penalty revenue has averaged approximately $48,000 annually during the last four fiscal years. Total costs for private conservators, liquidators, and receivers would very likely exceed $150,000 in a year if more than one escrow agent were to fail, or, if a single failed agency were place in receivership. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, this bill is a response to a case in which a couple sold their home yet was unable to collect the profit from sale because their escrow agent failed. An employee of the DBO was appointed conservator for the failed escrow agent but the employee neglected to submit a proof of loss claim within the statutory deadline. As a result, the sellers were unable to collect the full value of their profit from sale. 2)Public v. Private Administration. DBO indicates there have been 20 cases of escrow agents conserved, liquidated, or placed into receivership during the past 10 years. Private individuals handled 15 of those cases, while DBO employees handled 5. However, escrow agent failures tend to group together as a result of broader market dynamics. DBO experienced multiple escrow agent failures in a single year SB 736 Page 3 twice in the past 5 years, with 4 agents failing in one of those years. Unlike private conservators, DBO employees must continue to perform their regular duties as escrow examiners while also administering failed agents. DBO estimates average fees for private conservators are approximately $145,000, though these fees can be significantly higher if the failed escrow agency is placed in receivership. This bill is intended to provide additional resources to allow the commissioner to increase the use of private parties to carry out those duties, but the $125,000 in penalty revenue may not fully cover the cost of a single private conservator. 3)Escrow Insolvency. Existing law authorizes DBO to wind-down and liquidate failed escrow agents, petition the court to place agents in receivership, and appoint conservators in order to prevent the loss of escrow trust funds. Every licensed escrow agent is required to obtain a surety bond between $25,000 and $50,000 (depending on prior year trust obligations) to compensate DBO and its representatives in the event of insolvency; however such funds may be inadequate to fund the administration in certain cases. Analysis Prepared by:Joel Tashjian / APPR. / (916) 319-2081 SB 736 Page 4