BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 767 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 767 (De León) As Amended July 16, 2015 Majority vote SENATE VOTE: 24-13 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+---------------------+--------------------| |Local |6-3 |Gonzalez, Alejo, |Maienschein, | |Government | |Chiu, Cooley, |Linder, Waldron | | | |Gordon, Holden | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Transportation |12-2 |Frazier, Achadjian, |Linder, Melendez | | | |Bloom, Campos, Chu, | | | | |Daly, Dodd, Eduardo | | | | |Garcia, Gomez, | | | | |Medina, Nazarian, | | | | |O'Donnell | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Appropriations |12-4 |Gomez, Bloom, Bonta, |Bigelow, Gallagher, | | | |Calderon, Daly, |Jones, Wagner | SB 767 Page 2 | | |Eggman, Eduardo | | | | |Garcia, Holden, | | | | |Quirk, Rendon, | | | | |Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Authorizes the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), subject to voter approval, to impose an additional transactions and use tax. Specifically, this bill: 1)Authorizes MTA to impose a transactions and use tax for a period to be determined by MTA, at a rate that when combined with Measure R (2008), shall not exceed 1%. 2)Deletes authority previously granted to MTA to extend an existing 0.5% transactions and use tax (Measure R) by 30 years. 3)Requires the ordinance imposing the tax to contain an expenditure plan that lists the transportation projects and programs to be funded by the tax and requires the expenditure plan to include all of the following: a) The most recent cost estimates for each project and program identified in the expenditure plan; b) The identification of the accelerated cost, if applicable, for each project and program in the expenditure plan; SB 767 Page 3 c) The approximate schedule during which the MTA anticipates funds will be available for each project and program; and, d) The expected completion dates for each project and program within a three-year range. 4)Requires the ordinance imposing the tax to contain the following: a) A provision conforming the ordinance to the existing Transactions and Use Tax Law, except the 2% combined transactions and use tax cap; b) A provision that limits MTA's administrative costs to 1.5% of total net revenues; c) A requirement that the net revenues from the tax, defined to mean the total tax revenues, as specified, be used by MTA to fund transportation projects and programs identified in the expenditure plan; and, d) The rate of the tax. 5)Requires MTA to do the following: a) Develop a transparent process to determine the most recent costs; and, SB 767 Page 4 b) Post the expenditure plan, at least 30 days before submitting the ordinance, as specified under 5) below, on its Internet Web site in a prominent manner. 6)Requires the ordinance to be adopted by the MTA board, which shall also adopt a resolution that submits the ordinance to the voters. 7)Specifies that the ordinance only becomes operative, if approved by two-thirds of the voters voting on the measure, pursuant to California Constitution Article XIII C. 8)Requires, if the voters approve the ordinance, the expenditure plan included as an exhibit to the ordinance to be included in the revise and updated Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) within one year of the date the ordinance takes effect. 9)Requires the LRTP to also include capital projects and programs adopted by each subregion that are submitted to MTA for inclusion in the LRTP, if the cost and schedule details are provided by the subregions in a manner consistent with the requirements of the plan. States that inclusion of a capital project or program in the LRTP is not a commitment or guarantee that the project or program will receive any future funding. 10)Defines "subregion" to have the same meaning as that term as defined in the LRTP. 11)Allows MTA to incur bonded indebtedness payable from the net revenues of the tax. SB 767 Page 5 12) Requires the tax authority granted by this bill to be imposed, pursuant to the existing Transactions and Use Tax Law, notwithstanding the 2% combined transactions and use tax cap. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, negligible state fiscal impact. According to the State Board of Equalization (BOE) a new 0.5% district tax in Los Angeles County would raise approximately $8 million in the first full year of implementation. COMMENTS: 1)Transaction and Use Taxes. Transactions and use taxes are taxes imposed on the total retail price of any tangible personal property and the use or storage of such property when sales tax is not paid. These types of taxes may be levied as general taxes, which are unrestricted, or special taxes, which are restricted for a specified use. The Transactions and Use Tax law authorizes the adoption of local add-on rates to the combined state and local sales tax rate. The law has been amended multiple times to authorize specific cities, counties, special districts and county transportation authorities to impose a transactions and use tax, if voters approve the tax. Existing state law authorizes cities and counties to impose transactions and use taxes in 0.125% increments in addition to the state's 7.5% sales tax provided that the combined rate in the county does not exceed 2%. The Legislature has granted several exemptions to the 2% cap, including to several counties to allow an additional countywide transactions and use tax for transportation purposes. SB 767 Page 6 2)Prior Legislation. SB 314 (Murray), Chapter 785, Statutes of 2003, originally enacted provisions that authorized MTA to impose a 0.5% transactions and use tax, not subject to the 2% cap for no more than six and one-half years, for specific transportation projects and programs. The authority to put a tax measure on the ballot was never used. AB 2321 (Feuer), Chapter 302, Statutes of 2008, modified those provisions to allow MTA to impose a transactions and use tax for 30 years. AB 2321 additionally required MTA to adopt an expenditure plan prior to submitting a transactions and use tax to the voters and to include specified projects and programs in its LRTP. In November 2008, more than 67% of Los Angeles County voters approved this tax in a ballot measure known as Measure R. Measure R, in addition to Measure C (1990) and Proposition A (1980), are the three 0.5% countywide transactions and use taxes that provide the majority of MTA's funding. AB 1446 (Feuer), Chapter 806, Statutes of 2012, authorized MTA, subject to voter approval, to extend the existing transactions and use tax (Measure R) for an unlimited amount of time, allowing MTA to determine a sunset date, if any. AB 1446 also required MTA to update its expenditure plan prior to submitting the tax measure to the voters. However, the measure put before Los Angeles County voters in November 2012 (Measure J) failed to achieve the two-thirds threshold necessary for passage. SB 1037 (Hernández), Chapter 196, Statutes of 2014, requires MTA to update its expenditure plan and LRTP before placing another transactions and use tax measure before the voters. According to the Board of Equalization, Los Angeles County has 14 transactions and use taxes, three county-wide taxes for transportation purposes and 11 city-wide taxes. Despite the statutory exemption for MTA's transactions and use tax, Los Angeles County has reached the 2% cap. SB 767 Page 7 3)Bill Summary. This bill authorizes MTA to impose an additional transactions and use tax, subject to two-thirds voter approval, pursuant to the California Constitution. Under this bill, MTA may determine the length of the transactions and use tax, and the rate, when combined with Measure R, shall not exceed 1%. The transactions and use tax authorized by this bill is not subject to the 2% cap in existing law. Additionally, this bill requires the expenditure plan included in the ordinance imposing the tax to include the following: a) cost estimates for each project and program, using a transparent process; b) accelerated costs of each of the plan's projects and programs, if applicable; c) an approximate schedule for when MTA anticipates funds will be available for each project and program; and, d) expected completion dates for each project and program. Additionally, this bill requires the revised and updated LRTP to include the expenditure plan, if voters approve the ordinance within one year of the date the ordinance takes effect. The LRTP also must list capital projects and programs adopted by each subregion that are submitted to MTA for inclusion. The bill notes that including cost estimates does not mean the project is guaranteed funding. This bill is sponsored by MTA. 4)Author's Statement. According to the author, "Los Angeles is one of the nation's most congested transportation corridors in the nation. According to the Texas Transportation Institute's 2012 Mobility Report, an auto commuter in Los Angeles spends an average of 61 hours delayed in traffic per year, costing about $1,300 per year in lost time and wasted fuel due to congestion. These numbers will increase as the county's population will grow by one and a half million people in the next 30 years. SB 767 Page 8 "In 2008, the Los Angeles County voters recognized the need for additional transportation investments, both for increased transit options and highway/road improvements, and approved Measure R. Over the next 30 years, it is projected Measure R will generate $40 billion for congestion relief progress. Measure R is transforming Los Angeles County. The transit and highway projects now being constructed will relieve congestion and improve air quality. The Los Angeles Economic Development Council estimated in 2008 that Measure R projects will create 166,000 jobs. "While Measure R will dramatically change mobility throughout Los Angeles, the projects funded by the measure do not encompass all of the transportation needs in the region. Residents, local governments, and transportation leaders in the region believe there are thousands of worthy projects, particularly transit projects, which will not be funded by Measure R. An additional sales tax will allow Los Angeles County to further expand its transit system, address key highway needs around the county, support local agency transportation programs, and improve the Metrolink service." 5)Related Legislation. This bill is substantially similar to AB 338 (Hernández) of the current legislative session, which is pending in the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee with no hearing date set. AB 338 would also authorize MTA to impose an additional countywide 0.5% transactions and use tax, but contains several differences to this bill. AB 464 (Mullin) of 2015, vetoed by the Governor, sought to raise the overall statewide transactions and use tax rate cap from 2% to 3%. SB 767 Page 9 6)Arguments in Support. MTA states, "Currently, the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority is deciding whether to pursue a ballot measure to provide funding for additional transportation investments. This option is not possible without this legislation. Regardless of eventual decision made by the board, your legislation is essential to ensuring that all options to cut traffic, reduce smog, and increase mobility are available to the people of Los Angeles." 7)Arguments in Opposition. The California Taxpayers Association states, "Although the bill's intent to advance funding for transportation projects may be meritorious, any increase in the sales and use tax rate would only add to what is already one of the most regressive taxes in the state; and disproportionately impacts California's most vulnerable residents, making it more difficult for them to budget and purchase everyday necessities." Analysis Prepared by: Misa Lennox / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958 FN: 0001399