BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 776|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  SB 776
          Author:   Block (D)
          Amended:  5/19/15 >
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE:  7-0, 5/12/15
           AYES:  Hancock, Anderson, Leno, Liu, McGuire, Monning, Stone

           SUBJECT:   Disorderly conduct: prostitution


          SOURCE:    Californians Against Slavery


          DIGEST:  This bill 1) directs the sentencing court to impose a  
          fine of between $500 and $2,000 upon a defendant convicted of a  
          prostitution offense if the defendant was the person who offered  
          to provide, agreed to provide or provided compensation for a  
          sexual act; 2) specifies that the fine shall be imposed subject  
          to the defendant's ability to pay.  If the defendant cannot pay  
          the minimum fine, the court shall impose a fine the defendant  
          does have the ability to pay; and 3) provides that a portion of  
          the fine shall be retained by the county and used to fund  
          services to "victims of commercial sexual abuse."


          ANALYSIS:   Existing law provides that any person who solicits,  
          agrees to engage in, or engages in an act of prostitution is  
          guilty of a misdemeanor (Pen. Code § 647, subd. (b)), with the  
          following elements and relevant penalty provisions:


          1)Provides that the crime does not occur unless the person  








                                                                     SB 776  
                                                                    Page  2


            specifically intends to engage in an act of prostitution and  
            some act is done in furtherance of agreed upon act.

          2)Provides that prostitution includes any lewd act between  
            persons for money or other consideration.

          3)Provides that any person is convicted for a second  
            prostitution offense, the person shall serve a sentence of at  
            least 45 days, no part of which can be suspended or reduced.  
            (Pen. Code § 647, subds. (b) and (k).)

          4) Provides that a sentencing court imposes a criminal fine, the  
            fine shall include numerous penalty assessments and fees in  
            addition to the base fine - the fine stated in the penalty  
            provision for the crime.  The penalty assessments are  
            approximately 310% of the base fine.  A $100 fine requires the  
            defendant to actually pay approximately $410.  (Pen. Code §  
            1463-1463.01.)

          This bill:

          1)Provides that where the defendant is convicted of a  
            prostitution offense the defendant shall pay a fine of between  
            $500 and $2,000, subject to the defendant's ability to pay.   
            If the defendant does not have the ability to pay at least the  
            $500, the court shall impose a fine the defendant does have  
            the ability to pay.  

          2)Provides that 75% of the base fine shall be retained by the  
            county of prosecution and used to fund housing, counseling,  
            other direct services and "exit programs" for victims of  
            commercial sexual exploitation.  The board of supervisors of  
            the county shall designate a fund for deposit of "moneys  
            collected pursuant" to this special fine provision.

          Background


          The $500 minimum fine imposed upon prostitution customers under  
          this bill requires the defendant to actually pay at least $2,150  
          - the base fine, penalty assessments of approximately 310% of  
          the base fine and a restitution fine that is not subject to  
          penalty assessments.  The penalty assessments fund a wide range  
          of government programs, from court security to victim-witness  







                                                                     SB 776  
                                                                    Page  3


          programs.  Other fees and costs apply in a criminal case,  
          including reimbursement to the county for court-appointed  
          counsel.  Large criminal fines may be difficult to collect, as  
          collection could take years of effort and expense.  The  
          estimated amount of uncollected court ordered debt in 2011 was  
          $10.2 billion.  
          (http://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2014/criminal-justice/debt-collect 
          ion/court-ordered-debt-collection-111014.pdf.)

          The base fine - the amount of the fine stated in the penalty for  
          the crime, not including penalty assessments - is paid to the  
          county.  A moderate and certain fine would appear to be the most  
          effective way to produce any significant funding for services to  
          victims of commercial sexual exploitation.  The restitution fine  
          - a minimum fine of $300 for a felony and $150 for a misdemeanor  
          - provides substantial and steady funding for the Victims of  
          Crime Program.  It appears that total revenues of $60 million  
          are expected for 2015-2016 from restitution fines.  
          (http://www.ebudget.ca.gov/2015-16/pdf/GovernorsBudget/7500/7870. 
          pdf.)

          The few demographic and economic studies of prostitution  
          customers indicate that they come from a wide range of  
          socio-economic backgrounds.  It appears that persons with low  
          incomes are more likely to seek out street-level prostitutes,  
          and those are the persons most likely to be arrested.
          (http://economics.uchicago.edu/pdf/Prostitution%205.pdf?q=venkate 
          sh .)  
           
           Without specific authority to reduce the fine, the court could,  
          pursuant to Penal Code Section 1385, strike the entire fine  
          provision if it found that the defendant could not pay the fine,  
          including penalty assessments.   In that case, no fine would be  
          imposed at all.  Authorizing the court to reduce the minimum  
          amount in an unusual case in the interests of justice would make  
          it more likely that a fine would actually be imposed and  
          collected in such cases.  Further, a high fine could become  
          uncollectable, bringing the state or county to fruitlessly  
          expend resources in collection process.  This bill, as amended  
          in the Senate Public Safety Committee, directs the court to  
          impose a fine on prostitution customers that the defendant has  
          the ability to pay.  This bill will thus likely produce revenue  
          from most cases, creating a funding stream for services.
           







                                                                     SB 776  
                                                                    Page  4


          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:NoLocal:    No


          SUPPORT:   (Verified 5/20/15)


          Californians Against Slavery (source)
          Burning Bush Moments
          California Police Chiefs Association
          Everyone Free
          Mary Magdalene Project, Inc.
          Project Concern International
          Redeeming Love
          Rolling Hills Covenant Church
          The A21 Campaign
          Several individuals


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified 5/20/15)


          California Public Defenders Association
          Legal Services for Prisoners with Children


          Prepared by:Jerome McGuire / PUB. S. / 
          5/21/15 14:59:06


                                   ****  END  ****