BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 823 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 3, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Lorena Gonzalez, Chair SB 823 (Block) - As Amended August 1, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Public Safety |Vote:|6 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill allows an individual convicted of a nonviolent crime, as defined, while he or she was a human trafficking victim to apply to the court to vacate the conviction at any time after it was entered. The prosecutorial agency has 45 days, from the date of receipt of service of complete application, to oppose the application, if opposition to the application is not filed, the court is required to deem the application unopposed and must grant the application; but if the application is opposed, the court is required to hold a hearing on the application. If the defendant prevails, the court is required to seal the records and release the defendants from all penalties - except financial SB 823 Page 2 restitution- and disabilities, and the requirement to disclose the conviction of the crime. If the court denies the application because the evidence is insufficient to establish grounds for vacating a conviction, the denial may be without prejudice. The court may state its reasons; if those reasons are curable deficiencies, the court may allow the applicant a reasonable time period to cure the deficiencies upon which the court based the denial. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)Unknown costs to the courts, since many of the requests to vacate will be for misdemeanors and low-level felonies. However, if the prosecutorial agency opposes the request, the court must hold a hearing. For illustrative purposes, 100 such hearings would result in a cost of $167,000 (Trial Court Trust Fund) for two-hour hearings, and $670,000 for full-day hearings. 2)First-year cost of approximately $60,000 and ongoing cost of $90,000 (General Fund) to the Department of Justice for one position to address the workload to seal approximately700 records annually. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, this bill would provide victims of human trafficking a pathway to erase any nonviolent arrests and convictions from their records and give them a chance for a fresh start. These victims face stigmatization from being criminalized for crimes they were forced to commit during their exploitation, which limit access to good SB 823 Page 3 employment and create barriers to a variety of services such as housing and education. The author states, "Current California law does not do enough to ensure that victims have a chance to completely re-start their lives after they escape from their traffickers and the life of coercion associated with it." 2)Background. Under current law, if a victim of human trafficking is forced to commit a crime by their trafficker then they have the defenses of duress and necessity made available to them. Under current law, all persons are capable of committing crimes except persons who committed the act or made the omission charged under threats or menaces sufficient to show that they had reasonable cause to and did believe their lives would be endangered if they refused. 3)Human trafficking. Human trafficking involves the recruitment, transportation or sale of people for forced labor. Through violence, threats and coercion, victims are forced to work in, among other things, the sex trade, domestic labor, factories, hotels and agriculture. According to the January 2005 United States Department of State's Human Smuggling and Trafficking Center report, "Fact Sheet: Distinctions Between Human Smuggling and Human Trafficking", an estimated 600,000 to 800,000 men, women and children are trafficked across international borders each year. Of these, approximately 80% are women and girls and up to 50% are minors. A recent report by the Human Rights Center at the University of California, Berkeley cited 57 cases of forced labor in California between 1998 and 2003, with over 500 victims. The report, "Freedom Denied", notes most of the victims in California were from Thailand, Mexico, and Russia and had been forced to work as prostitutes, domestic slaves, farm laborers or sweatshop employees. [University of California, Berkeley Human Rights SB 823 Page 4 Center, "Freedom Denied: Forced Labor in California" (February, 2005).] 4)Related Legislation: a) AB 1672 (Campos), awaiting a hearing in Senate Appropriations, allows an individual convicted of a nonviolent crime while he or she was a human trafficking victim to apply to the court to vacate the conviction if the individual has not been convicted of any crime after successfully completing probation, or if probation is not granted, for two years after release from custody. b) AB 1675 (Stone), awaiting a hearing in Senate Appropriations, provides that a minor who commits the crimes of solicitation, prostitution, or loitering with the intent to commit prostitution, is subject to the jurisdiction of the juvenile dependency court rather than delinquency court. c) AB 1760 (Santiago), held in this Committee's Suspense file earlier this year, would have directed a peace officer who determines that a minor is a victim of human trafficking to report such abuse, consult with a child welfare worker about a safe placement for the minor, and transport the minor to such placement, unless the minor is otherwise arrested.. 1)Prior Legislation: a) AB 1585 (Alejo), Chapter, 708, Statutes of 2014, provides that a defendant who has been convicted of solicitation or prostitution may petition the court to set aside the conviction if the defendant can establish by clear and convincing evidence that the conviction was the result of his or her status as a victim of human trafficking. SB 823 Page 5 b) AB 1940 (Hill), 2012, would have authorized a court to seal a record of conviction for prostitution based on a finding that the petitioner is a victim of human trafficking, that the offense is the result of the petitioner's status as a victim of that crime, and that the petitioner is therefore factually innocent. AB 1940 was held in this committee's Suspense file. c) AB 702 (Swanson), of the 2011-12 Legislative Session, would have allowed a person adjudicated a ward of the court or a person convicted of prostitution to have his or her record sealed or conviction expunged without showing that he or she has not been subsequently convicted or that he or she has been rehabilitated. AB 702 was never heard by this Committee and was returned to the Chief Clerk. d) AB 22 (Lieber), Chapter 240, Statutes of 2005, created the California Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which established civil and criminal penalties for human trafficking and allowed for forfeiture of assets derived from human trafficking. In addition, the Act required law enforcement agencies to provide Law Enforcement Agency Endorsement to trafficking victims, providing trafficking victims with protection from deportation and created the human trafficking task force. Analysis Prepared by:Pedro Reyes / APPR. / (916) 319-2081 SB 823 Page 6