BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 824| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 824 Author: Beall (D) Amended: 8/18/16 Vote: 21 SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 10-1, 4/19/16 AYES: Beall, Cannella, Allen, Bates, Galgiani, Leyva, McGuire, Mendoza, Roth, Wieckowski NOES: Gaines SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 6-1, 5/27/16 AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, McGuire, Mendoza NOES: Nielsen SENATE FLOOR: 26-11, 6/1/16 AYES: Allen, Beall, Block, De León, Galgiani, Glazer, Hall, Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Wieckowski, Wolk NOES: Anderson, Bates, Berryhill, Fuller, Gaines, Moorlach, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Stone, Vidak NO VOTE RECORDED: Cannella, Huff, Runner ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 60-11, 8/23/16 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Low Carbon Transit Operations Program SOURCE: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority DIGEST: This bill modifies the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP). Assembly Amendments require a recipient agency to demonstrate that LCTOP funds do not supplant other funding sources; allow SB 824 Page 2 recipient agencies to spend LCTOP funds on operational expenditures that increase transit mode share; limits the period a recipient agency may carry over LCTOP funds for a maximum of four years; requires a recipient agency to comply with applicable legal requirements, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and state and federal civil rights and environmental justice laws; and adds, as a condition for state reimbursement under a letter of no prejudice (LONP), that sufficient funds are available from both the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) and the agency's formula allocation share under LCTOP. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1) Establishes the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) (SB 862, Committee on Budget, Chapter 36, Statutes of 2014), a competitive grant program to fund capital improvements and operational investments that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and modernize California's intercity, commuter, and urban rail and bus systems to achieve specific policy objectives. Program goals include providing at least 25% of available funding to projects that provide a direct benefit to disadvantaged communities (DACs). Existing law continuously appropriates 10% of annual GGRF to TIRCP beginning in 2015-16. 2) Establishes the LCTOP (SB 862), which provides operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce GHG emissions and improve mobility, with a priority on serving DACs. Eligible projects include new or expanded bus or rail services and expanded intermodal transit facilities, and may include equipment acquisition, fueling, maintenance, and other costs to operate those services or facilities. All projects must reduce GHG emissions. Funds are allocated to transit agencies pursuant to the State Transit Assistance statutory formula. For agencies whose service area includes DACs, at least 50% of the total monies received must be spent on projects that will benefit DACs. Existing law continuously appropriates 5% of annual GGRF funds to LCTOP beginning in 2015-16. SB 824 Page 3 3) Makes a number of modifications to the TIRCP (SB 9, Beall, Chapter 710, Statutes of 2015), including: a) Requiring funding of capital improvements that are "transformative," defined as a rail, bus, or ferry transit project that will significantly reduce vehicle miles traveled, congestion, and GHG emissions by creating a new transit system, increasing the capacity of an existing transit system, or otherwise significantly increasing the ridership of a transit system. b) Eliminating operations funding as an eligible use of TIRCP funds. c) Authorizing the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) to make multiyear funding commitments. d) Requiring CalSTA to maximize the total amount of GHG emission reductions achieved under the program. e) Establishing a process whereby an agency applying for funds for a multiyear project can obtain a letter of no prejudice (LONP) from CalSTA to allow the agency to advance its own fund and be eligible for future reimbursement from the program. This bill: 1) Provides that a recipient transit agency must demonstrate that a project reduces GHG emissions in order to receive LCTOP funds. 2) Requires a recipient transit agency to demonstrate that expenditures of LCTOP monies do not supplant another funding source. 3) Allows a recipient transit agency to spend LCTOP monies on operational expenditures that increase transit mode share. 4) Allows a recipient transit agency to use LCTOP monies to purchase zero-emission buses, including electric buses, and SB 824 Page 4 to install necessary equipment and infrastructure to operate and support such buses. 5) Requires a recipient transit agency for capital projects to: a) Specify the phases of work for which it is seeking an LCTOP allocation b) Identify the sources and timing of all monies required to undertake and complete any phase of a project for which it is seeking an LCTOP allocation c) Describe intended sources and timing of funding to complete any subsequent phases of the project, through construction or procurement 6) Allows a recipient transit agency that has used LCTOP monies for any type of eligible operational assistance in a previous fiscal year to use LCTOP monies to continue the same service or program in a subsequent fiscal year if it can demonstrate that additional GHG emissions reductions can be realized. 7) Allows a recipient transit agency that does not submit a project for funding in a particular fiscal year to retain its funding share and to utilize the accumulated funding share in a subsequent fiscal year. Requires the recipient transit agency to specify the number of fiscal years it intends to retain its share and the expenditure for which it is intended. Limits fund retention to a maximum of four years. 8) Allows a recipient transit agency, in any fiscal year, to loan or transfer its funding share to another recipient transit agency in the same region for any identified eligible expenditure under LCTOP. 9) Allows a recipient transit agency to apply to Caltrans to reassign to another eligible expenditure under LCTOP any savings or surplus monies allocated from LCTOP, or any previously allocated LCTOP monies for an expenditure that the agency has determined is no longer a priority. 10)Requires a recipient transit agency to comply with all SB 824 Page 5 applicable legal requirements, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and state and federal civil rights and environmental justice laws. 11)Expands the audit of public transit operator finances required by existing law to include verification of receipt and appropriate expenditure of LCTOP monies. Requires each recipient transit agency receiving LCTOP monies in a fiscal year for which an audit is conducted to transmit a copy of the audit to Caltrans, and requires Caltrans to make these audits available to the Legislature and Controller upon request. 12)Allows a recipient transit agency to apply to Caltrans for an LONP for program expenditures authorized by Caltrans. Allows the recipient transit agency, if the request is approved, to spend its own monies and to be eligible for future reimbursement from LCTOP. Provides that reimbursement shall be made if: a) The authorized expenditures have commenced and any regional or local expenditures, if applicable, have been incurred b) The expenditures are eligible under LCTOP c) The recipient transit agency complies with all legal requirements for the project, including CEQA and state and federal civil rights and environmental justice obligations, if applicable d) Sufficient monies are available from the GGRF and from the recipient transit agency's formula allocation share 13)Requires the recipient transit agency and Caltrans to enter into an agreement governing LONP reimbursement. 14)Authorizes Caltrans to develop guidelines to implement the LONP provisions of this bill. Comments SB 824 Page 6 1)TIRCP v. LCTOP. SB 9 of last year eliminated operations as an eligible expenditure under TIRCP. This resulted in TIRCP exclusively funding transit capital projects. On the other hand, while LCTOP was created to provide both operating and capital assistance, LCTOP currently requires a recipient agency to, among other things, demonstrate that the funds will "directly enhance or expand transit service to increase mode share," which is primarily an operating expense. Both programs were created under SB 862, and both are funded with GGRF monies, but they also differ in that LCTOP funds are allocated to transit agencies on a formula basis, while TIRCP is a competitive grant program. 2)Moving funds around. This bill provides flexibility for recipient transit agencies to loan or transfer funds among themselves. The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), sponsor of this bill, states that this flexibility will help ensure that an agency that is not ready to move forward with a project in a particular year can loan its share to another agency which has insufficient funds to advance an eligible project. (Currently, LCTOP program guidelines allow transfers but require the agency to demonstrate "mutual benefit.") It will also help ensure that if an agency has a share so small that it is outweighed by the costs (in staff time) of preparing the application, or an agency does not currently have an eligible use for its share, or did not spend its entire share due to project savings, it can transfer it to another agency within the same region. 3)Streamlining project eligibility. Existing law requires a recipient transit agency to demonstrate that a project receiving LCTOP funds increases mode share, expands service, benefits DACs, and reduces GHG emissions. However, this bill intends to establish greater flexibility relative to how LCTOP funds can be used for the above-mentioned eligible projects that aim to reduce GHG emissions. VTA, sponsor of this bill, states that by maximizing flexibility for eligible project expenditures, this bill ensures that agencies will be able to use their formula shares for the broadest array of projects and services to reduce GHG emissions, including the purchase of zero-emission electric buses to replace diesel buses. SB 824 Page 7 4)Funding operating costs beyond the first year. This bill allows an agency to continue to use its LCTOP share to support new or expanded service beyond the first year in which the service is implemented, provided it can demonstrate that additional GHG reductions will be achieved beyond the first year. The author states that this provision addresses the fact that it often takes more than one year for new service to "ramp up" to projected ridership - and, by extension, for projected mode share and GHG reductions to be realized. 5)Audit streamlining. Existing law, the Transportation Development Act (TDA), requires all public transit agencies to undergo a financial audit each year. This bill includes LCTOP in that audit, rather than subjecting agencies to a separate audit just for LCTOP. 6)LONPs. Last year's SB 9 authorized TIRCP grant recipients to receive an LONP from CalSTA, which enables the recipient to spend alternative funds on a project and later be reimbursed from TIRCP. This bill includes similar LONP provisions for LCTOP, enabling an agency to advance its project using local dollars with the promise of later LCTOP reimbursement, rather than having to wait for the LCTOP allocation. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: No According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee: 1)Ongoing special fund costs to Caltrans, which administers the LCTOP, of $200,000 to $300,000 for two or three positions to revise program guidelines, establish systems for tracking the LONP process, monitor transit agencies' accounting for and use of funds, as modified by the bill, prepare the Legislature report, and for workload associated with the expanded audit requirements. [Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund - GGRF] 2)Ongoing special fund cost to the Air Resources Board of $160,000 for one position to coordinate with Caltrans on the adoption of program guidelines, and provide guidance on tracking and reporting GHG reductions and disadvantaged SB 824 Page 8 communities' benefits. 3)Potentially significant cost pressures, from expanding eligible use of LCTOP funds to include expenditures for the purchase of zero-emission buses and equipment and infrastructure to operate and support those buses. SUPPORT: (Verified8/22/16) Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (source) Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District Asian Pacific Environmental Network Associated General Contractors Bay Area Rapid Transit District California Bicycle Coalition California ReLeaf California Transit Association California Walks Central Contra Costa Transit Authority Coalition for Clean Air Foothill Transit Gamaliel of California Housing California Investing in Place Long Beach Transit Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metropolitan Transportation Commission Monterey-Salinas Transit Move L.A. Napa Valley Transportation Authority North Bay Organizing Project Orange County Transportation Authority Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Public Advocates Safe Routes to School National Partnership San Bernardino Associated Governments Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District SB 824 Page 9 San Mateo County Transit District San Mateo County Transportation Authority Santa Monica Big Blue Bus Solano County Transit TransForm Transportation Authority of Marin Trust for Public Land Ventura County Transportation Commission OPPOSITION: (Verified8/22/16) None received ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 60-11, 8/23/16 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Arambula, Atkins, Baker, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Lackey, Levine, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, McCarty, Medina, Mullin, Nazarian, O'Donnell, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon NOES: Travis Allen, Bigelow, Brough, Dahle, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Grove, Harper, Jones, Melendez, Patterson NO VOTE RECORDED: Chang, Gray, Kim, Linder, Mathis, Mayes, Obernolte, Olsen, Steinorth Prepared by: Erin Riches / T. & H. / (916) 651-4121 8/23/16 19:54:33 **** END **** SB 824 Page 10