BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 866 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 28, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS Jacqui Irwin, Chair SB 866 (Roth) - As Amended June 16, 2016 SENATE VOTE: 38-0 SUBJECT: Veterans housing SUMMARY: Authorizes a housing developer or service provider that provides housing or services under the Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention Bond Act of 2014 (VHHP), to provide housing or services to veterans and their children in women-only facilities in limited instances, as specified. Specifically, this bill: 1)Establishes the "Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention Act of 2016: Proposition 41 Expenditures: Military Sexual Trauma." 2)Defines, for specified purposes, "women-only facilities" as those that may house and provide services to female veterans only and their children, and shall not house or provide services to any adult who is not a dependent of a female veteran. 3)Provides that a housing developer or service provider may SB 866 Page 2 provide housing or services to female veterans and their children in women-only facilities in limited instances, specifically when a female veteran: a) Has suffered any form of sexual abuse, trauma, or intimidation or harassment while serving in the military and is seeking treatment for that sexual abuse, trauma, or intimidation or harassment; or b) Is seeking the housing or services as a result of being a victim of sexual abuse or domestic violence. 4)Provides that a housing developer or service provider that provides housing or services to female veterans in women-only facilities shall ensure that the housing or services shall provide supportive housing or services with a focus on, among others, treating the effects of military sexual abuse, trauma, or intimidation in a gender-specific manner. 5)Makes legislative findings and declarations: a) The significant number of women veterans, as a percentage of all veterans, and also as California's share of the nation's total population of women veterans. b) The statistical percentage of women veterans who have experienced military sexual trauma (MST). c) The life-changing consequences of MST on victims, including, for example, the increased risks of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and of becoming homeless following separation from the military. SB 866 Page 3 d) The need to ensure that women veterans, particularly those who have suffered MST and its negative consequences, receive women-centered treatment, which has been demonstrated to be "the most important factor contributing to their comfort" with federal veterans' benefit services. e) Providing gender-specific treatment and housing, pursuant to this act: i) Serves a compelling state interest, which interest is providing the best possible treatment to female veterans, who have served our country and who now face additional hurdles that disproportionately affect female veterans over male veterans. ii) Is substantially related to the achievement of those objectives. f) Recognizes that PTSD is a serious condition and classified as a disability under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the federal Fair Housing Act (FHA), and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). As such, victims of MST-related PTSD have a disability and should be afforded a reasonable accommodation in the form of access to women's only housing and supportive services for victims of MST. EXISTING LAW: 1)Establishes the VHHP, an initiative measure enacted by the SB 866 Page 4 voters as Proposition 41 at the June 3, 2014, primary election, authorizing $600 million in bonds for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of affordable multifamily supportive housing, affordable multifamily transitional housing, or related facilities for veterans and their families (Military and Veterans Code Section 998.540, et seq.). 2)Requires the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA), the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), and the Department of Veterans Affairs (CalVet), to work collaboratively to carry out the duties and functions of the VHHP (Military and Veterans Code Section 987.002). 3)Requires the departments, to the extent feasible, to prioritize VHHP projects that combine housing and supportive services, including, but not limited to, job training, mental health and drug treatment, case management, care coordination, or physical rehabilitation. 4)Declares it to be against public policy the practice of discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, or genetic information; and that every person has a civil right to be given the opportunity to seek, obtain, or hold employment and housing without facing discrimination based on these protected classes (Government Code Sections 12920-12921). 5)Declares it unlawful, pursuant to FEHA, for any housing accommodation owner to inquire about; make known any SB 866 Page 5 preference or limitation as to; discriminate; or harass a person based on the person's race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, or genetic information (Government Code Section 12955). 6)Prohibits, under the Unruh Civil Rights Act, business establishments from discriminating on the basis of sex (including gender), race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, or sexual orientation, and provides civil remedies for violations of its provisions (Civil Code Section 51 et seq.) FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Committee on Appropriations: 1)HCD does not anticipate a significant fiscal impact. 2)CalVet estimates negligible costs to implement this bill. COMMENTS: There is a great deal of evidence and concern that the needs of women veterans are unique from those of men and that many existing veterans housing opportunities do not meet those needs. It is not clear nor has evidence been presented to this Committee what the reason is for the lack of such projects. However, one issue which repetitively arises is the ambiguous legality of gender segregated housing. It is logical that a developer might not want to embark on a development which has a known critical legal ambiguity and that the developer might choose to develop a project without that issue. This bill seeks to clarify for developers, veterans, and all other stakeholders, under what circumstances gender segregated housing is clearly SB 866 Page 6 legal, based on the current case law as well as state and federal code and regulations. Though other challenges may remain to meeting the unique needs of women veterans, this bill would clarify how gender segregated housing could work and present a clearer roadmap for developers and others considering such projects or evaluating them from a state or local government. The Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention Act of 2014 was created to expand housing and service options for veterans, cost-effectively leverage public dollars, reduce the number of homeless veterans and the attendant public costs, and place California at the forefront of our nation's efforts to end veterans' homelessness by 2016. The focus of the VHHP Act is on housing for veterans who are homeless or at risk for homelessness and in need of services such as mental health counseling, substance abuse treatment, job training, and physical therapy to address injuries. Concerns exist that current anti-discrimination law may hinder the ability to deliver women-centric housing and treatment under the VHHP program. This bill is, in part, an attempt to address those concerns. Neither the administering agencies nor the Department of Fair Employment and Housing have produced legal analyses that clarify specifically where in law the various concerns are generated. According to the California Women's Law Center: Veteran-only supportive housing facilities are intended to couple access to medical and social services with permanent housing solutions, serving an essential function in helping veterans who have encountered difficulty adjusting to civilian life get back on their feet. Many veterans are confronted with mental and physical health issues resulting SB 866 Page 7 from their military service. For example, many women veterans who were the victims of military sexual trauma (MST) suffer from PTSD and other related disabilities. Supportive housing is intended to serve all veterans and to accommodate and serve veterans with disabilities, among others. Women veterans, however, are deterred from seeking veteran-only housing or are effectively being denied equal opportunity to use and enjoy such facilities because of conditions such as MST-related PTSD. These disabilities are exacerbated when women veterans who suffered MST are required to live in an environment that triggers their experience of being in the male-dominated military where they were assaulted or harassed. Women veterans have legitimate concerns about their mental and physical well-being living in such facilities because veteran-only housing providers fail to make gender-specific accommodations for MST-related disabilities. An important tenet of fair housing laws is that policies and practices - even those that are neutral and longstanding - must be modified in certain circumstances to accommodate the needs of residents with disabilities. To accommodate MST-related disabilities, veteran-only housing providers should offer women veterans the option of separate housing. a) At existing facilities, policies should be modified to permit women to be housed together on separate floors, or SB 866 Page 8 in separate wings or buildings. b) Housing developers seeking Prop 41 funds to develop new facilities should not be granted access to such funds unless they commit to providing appropriate health and safety accommodations for women veterans, including the option of separate housing. The refusal of veteran-only permanent housing providers to make reasonable gender-specific safety and residential accommodations for MST- related disabilities constitutes discrimination under the fair housing laws. Providing such reasonable accommodations, including separate housing for women veterans, responds to bona fide disability-based needs and, therefore, does not offend other nondiscrimination provisions of those laws. The option of separate housing at both existing and new veteran-only housing facilities would help provide women veterans with MST-related disabilities equal opportunity to use and enjoy those facilities. And when coupled with additional security measures that address safety concerns more generally, housing providers may meet their obligation to provide safe housing to all veterans. According to the author: SB 866 declares that providing gender-specific treatment and housing to veterans who are victims of military sexual trauma is a compelling state interest. As such, this bill would allow a housing developer or service provider to apply for Proposition 41 bond money with the intention of building a gender specific community that provides supportive services to treat MST. SB 866 will be narrowly tailored to SB 866 Page 9 ensure that gender specific treatment can be provided without violating gender discrimination housing laws. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO American GI Forum of California American Legion - Department of California AMVETS - Department of California California Association of County Veterans Service Officers National Association of Social Workers- California Chapter Vietnam Veterans of American - California State Council Opposition SB 866 Page 10 None on File. Analysis Prepared by:John Spangler / V.A. / (916) 319-3550