SB 876, as amended, Liu. Homelessness.
Existing law provides that no person shall, on the basis of race, national origin, ethnic group identification, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, color, genetic information, or disability, be unlawfully denied full and equal access to the benefits of, or be unlawfully subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity that is conducted, operated, or administered by the state or by any state agency, is funded directly by the state, or receives any financial assistance from the state.
This bill would afford persons experiencing homelessness the right to use public spaces without discrimination based on their housing status and describe basic human and civil rights that may be exercised without being subject to criminal or civil sanctions, including the right to use and to move freely in public spaces, the right to rest in public spaces and to protect oneself from the elements, the right to eat in any public space in which having food is not prohibited, and the right to perform religious observances in public spaces, as specified. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature that these provisions be interpreted broadly so as to prohibit policies or practices that are discriminatory in either their purpose or effect.
The bill would authorize a person whose rights have been violated pursuant to these provisions to enforce those rights in a civil action in which the court may award the prevailing plaintiff injunctive and declaratory relief, restitution, damages, statutory damages of $1,000 per violation, and fees and costs.
The bill would also require all applicants for the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Program to annually provide to the Department of Housing and Community Development’s Division of Housing Policy Development a copy of its application for funding from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development that includes the organization’s response to the application question regarding steps that its community is taking to reduce criminalization of homelessness. Because the bill would require local agencies to perform additional duties, it would impose a state-mandated local program.begin insert The bill would require the Department of Housing and Community Development to compile the information regarding community actions to reduce criminalization of homelessness found in those applications and provide a report to the Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee and the Senate Transportation and Housing Committeeend insert
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) According to the United States Department of Housing and
4Urban Development’s report to Congress, 115,738 people were
5estimated to be homeless in California in 2014, a rate that is
6unprecedented following a deep and prolonged economic recession,
P3 1a severe shortage of safe and affordable housing, a failed veteran
2and civilian mental health system, and a diminished social safety
3net.
4(b) According to the United States Department of Education,
5284,086 schoolchildren were known to have experienced
6homelessness in the
2013-14 school year.
7(c) Homelessness is an independent risk factor for a number of
8illnesses, making people more susceptible to increased health
9problems due to high stress, sleep deprivation, unsanitary
10surroundings, lack of access to hygiene facilities, and a myriad of
11other situational stressors experienced by people without stable
12housing. Subsequently, people who are chronically homeless are
13more medically frail and three to four times more likely to die
14prematurely than their housed counterparts.
15(d) Throughout California, local governments have enacted
16ordinances that make it illegal to rest or receive nourishment in
17public spaces.
18(e) Ending homelessness in California will require significant
19state
and federal resources and there is ample evidence that policies
20that invest in ending homelessness, rather than criminalizing and
21marginalizing people who are experiencing homelessness,
22
adequately balance the needs of all parties: community residents,
23government agencies, businesses, and men and women who are
24experiencing homelessness.
25(f) Passing this act will not reduce homelessness, but neither
26will local ordinances that criminalize homelessness. Instead,
27ordinances that criminalize homelessness result in increased
28incarceration rates and financial indebtedness of people who simply
29have no means of support and prolong homelessness by making
30it more difficult for people to secure housing, employment, and
31medical care. Criminalization policies further marginalize men
32and women who are experiencing homelessness, fuel inflammatory
33attitudes, and may even unduly restrict constitutionally protected
34liberties.
35(g) That is why, on September 18, 2015, the United States
36Department of Housing and Urban Development included in the
37annual Notice of Funding Availability for the 2015 Continuum of
38Care Programbegin delete funding competition,end deletebegin insert Competitionend insert provisions that
39would award additional points to any application that could include
P4 1steps the community is taking to reduce criminalization of
2homelessness.
3(h) It is also why, on August 6, 2015, the United States
4Department of Justice submitted a rare statement of interest in a
5United States District Court in opposition to the criminalization
6of people who are homeless, calling it cruel and unusual
7punishment to punish
someone for a crime with the potential for
8imprisonment and a violation of constitutional rights.
9(i) While these ordinances apply to all residents, they
10disproportionately impact people without homes, who have no
11private place to rest or seek nourishment, and are often selectively
12applied by law enforcement to people based upon their appearance
13or an assumption of homelessness.
14(j) In practice, these ordinances deprive persons experiencing
15homelessness and those who may be perceived as homeless of a
16safe and legal place to rest and seek nourishment, which adversely
17impacts their health and well-being.
18(k) Sleep deprivation impairs cognitive processes and puts one
19at
risk for obesity, heart disease, heart attack, heart failure, irregular
20heartbeat, high blood pressure, stroke, diabetes, and depression.
21People who are homeless suffer from sleep deprivation and, absent
22a place to rest, they suffer it more frequently.
23(l) Because current practices have denied the right to adequate
24legal representation to people cited or arrested while resting or
25sharing food, homeless persons are often denied relief or damages
26through the courts.
27(m) Both the federal government, through its Interagency
28Council on Homelessness, and the United Nations have recognized
29that discrimination and criminalization violate a homeless person’s
30human rights and have called upon state and local governments to
31cease enactment and
enforcement of those laws.
32(n) Homelessness and the increasing criminalization of
33homelessness and discrimination against those experiencing
34homelessness are widespread throughout California and are matters
35of statewide concern.
36(o) Section 1 of Article I of the California Constitution provides
37that “[a]ll people are by nature free and independent and have
38inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life
39and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and
40pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy,” without
P5 1qualification as to whether or not a person is, or appears to be,
2homeless.
3(p) Subdivision (a) of Section 7 of
Article I of the California
4Constitution provides that “[a] person may not be deprived of life,
5liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal
6protection of the laws ... .”
7(q) Concordant with this fundamental belief, a person should
8not be subject to discrimination based on his or her income, housing
9status, or ability or desire to appear housed. Therefore, it is the
10intent of the Legislature in enacting this legislation to protect the
11rights of all Californians, regardless of their housing status, and
12ameliorate the adverse effects caused by the criminalization of
13homelessness on our communities and our citizens.
14(r) Decriminalization of rest allows municipal governments to
15redirect resources from local enforcement
activities to activities
16that address the root causes of homelessness and poverty.
Part 2.2 (commencing with Section 53.8) is added to
18Division 1 of the Civil Code, to read:
19
For purposes of this part, the following definitions shall
23apply:
24(a) “Homeless persons,” “homeless people,” or “persons
25experiencing homelessness” means those individuals or members
26of families who lack a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime
27residence, including people defined as homeless using the criteria
28established in the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid
29Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act of 2009.
30(b) “Public space” means any property that is owned by a
31government entity orbegin delete any propertyend delete upon which there is an
easement
32for public use and that is held open to the public, including, but
33not limited to, plazas, courtyards, parking lots, sidewalks, public
34transportation facilities and services, public buildings, shopping
35centers, and parks.begin insert The ability to rest shall not apply to a public
36space during a time it is closed to all persons or when a fee is
37required for entry or use.end insert
38(c) “Rest” means the state of not moving, holding certain
39postures that include, but are not limited to, sitting, standing,
40leaning, kneeling, squatting, sleeping, or lying.
(a) It is the intent of the Legislature that this section be
2interpreted broadly so as to prohibit policies or practices that are
3discriminatory in either their purpose or effect.
4(b) Persons experiencing homelessness shall be permitted to
5use public space in the ways described in this section at any time
6that the public space is open to the public without discrimination
7based upon their housing status, and without being subject to
8criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. Permitted use of the
9public space include, but are not limited to, all of the following:
10(1) Free movement without restraint.
11(2) Sleeping or resting, and protecting oneself from the elements
12while sleeping or resting in a nonobstructive manner.
13(3) Eating, sharing, accepting, or giving food in a space in which
14having food is not otherwise generally prohibited.
15(4) Praying, meditating, worshiping, or practicing religion.
16(c) Nothing in this section shall prevent law enforcement from
17enforcing laws to protect the right of people to use the sidewalk
18pursuant to the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
19(42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.).
20(d) Nothing in this section shall prevent law enforcement from
21enforcing the Penal Code,
except subdivision (e) of Section 647
22of the Penal Code, so far as it prohibitsbegin delete rest.end deletebegin insert rest in public spaces
23as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 53.8.end insert
(a) Any person whose rights have been violated pursuant
25to this part may enforce those rights in a civil action.
26(b) The court may award appropriate injunctive and declaratory
27relief, restitution for loss of property or personal effects and
28belongings, actual damages, compensatory damages, exemplary
29damages, statutory damages of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per
30violation, and reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing
31plaintiff.
Section 11139.2 is added to the Government Code, to
33read:
To improve monitoring of discrimination based upon
35housing status and violations of Part 2.2 (commencing with Section
3653.8) of Division 1 of the Civil Code, and to ensure that people
37who are experiencing homelessness are not unlawfully denied full
38and equal access to the benefits of state-funded programs or
39assistance, or unlawfully subjected to discrimination, all applicants
40for the United States Department of Housing and Urban
P7 1Development’s Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Program
2shall annually provide to the Department of Housing and
3Community Development’s Division of Housing Policy
4Development a copy of its application for funding from the United
5States Department of Housing and Urban Development that
6includes the
organization’s response to the application question
7regarding steps that its community is taking to reduce
8criminalization of homelessness.begin insert Notwithstanding Section 10231.5,
9the Department of Housing and Community Development shall
10compile the information regarding community actions to reduce
11criminalization of homelessness found in those applications and
12provide an annual report to the Assembly Housing and Community
13Development Committee and the Senate Transportation and
14Housing Committee.end insert
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
16this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
17local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
18pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
194 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
O
96