BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Session SB 882 (Hertzberg) - Crimes: public transportation: minors ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Version: January 15, 2016 |Policy Vote: PUB. S. 5 - 1 | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Urgency: No |Mandate: No | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Hearing Date: April 25, 2016 |Consultant: Jolie Onodera | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. Bill Summary: SB 882 would prohibit a minor from being charged with an infraction or misdemeanor for evading a transit fare. Fiscal Impact: Criminal fine/fee/surcharge revenues : Unknown, potentially significant reduction in criminal penalty collections statewide (General/Special/Local Funds) to the extent local agencies continue to issue criminal citations in lieu of levying administrative penalties upon minors as recently authorized pursuant to SB 413 (Chapter 765/2015). The magnitude of the impact on the state and local jurisdictions would be dependent on various factors including but not limited to the number of minors who would have been cited for the offense, the number of counties imposing administrative penalties in lieu of criminal fines, the level of enforcement SB 882 (Hertzberg) Page 1 of ? by local entities, and the collection efforts in each jurisdiction. Public transportation agencies : Potentially significant ongoing administrative penalty revenue losses (Local Funds) to agencies that have enacted ordinances imposing administrative penalties in lieu of criminal fines for fare evasion, to the extent prohibiting the charging of a minor under the Penal Code also precludes transit operators from imposing a penalty that exceeds the fine amounts established in the Penal Code, which could potentially be interpreted to be a fine amount of $0 imposed on minors for fare evasion. Criminal justice system : Potentially significant future cost savings resulting from reduced involvement with the courts, local law enforcement agencies including county probation departments, and child welfare services. Background: Existing law provides that a person who evades the payment of a fare on a public transit system, including the misuse of a transfer, pass, ticket, or token, or providing unacceptable proof of payment upon request of a transit system representative, is guilty of an offense subject to the following penalties: Upon a first or second violation, an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $250 and by community service for a total time not to exceed 48 hours over a period not to exceed 30 days, during a time other than the violator's hours of school attendance or employment. A third or subsequent violation is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $400 or by imprisonment in a county jail for a period of not more than 90 days, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Under existing law pursuant to PC § 640(e), public transportation agencies may enact and enforce an ordinance to impose and enforce an administrative penalty for specified acts, including the evasion of the payment of a fare of the system. (PUC § 99580(a).) In setting the amounts of administrative penalties for the specified violations, including fare evasion, public SB 882 (Hertzberg) Page 2 of ? transportation agencies are prohibited from establishing penalty amounts that exceed the maximum fine amount set forth in PC § 640. (PUC § 99580(e).) Prior to January 1, 2016, transportation agencies were prohibited from imposing administrative penalties for transit violations on minors, and instead were required to pursue transit violations by minors through criminal charges if the agency chose to pursue the matter. The provisions of SB 413 (Wieckowski) Chapter 765/2015, which became effective January 1, 2016, provided transportation agencies with the authority to extend the enforcement and imposition of administrative penalties for transit violations to include minors. Related Legislation: AB 891 (Campos) 2016 would provide students who are eligible for free or reduced-price meals with free transportation to and from school, and would require each local education agency to designate a liaison to address transportation issues. This bill is pending on the Suspense File of the Assembly Appropriations Committee. Prior Legislation: SB 413 (Wieckowski) Chapter 765/2015 added violations to the list of activities that are infractions related to transit operators, as well as authorized transit operators to levy administrative penalties against minors as potential violators of all existing infractions. AB 426 (Lowenthal) Chapter 100/2011 permits specified transit authorities to create ordinances that allow a person cited for a violation be afforded an opportunity to complete an administrative process that imposes only a civil penalty. Requires that penalties be deposited in the respective general fund of the county in which the citation is administered. SB 1749 (Migden) Chapter 258/2006 authorized certain transit operators to enforce administrative penalties for transit violations. While SB 1749 provided this administrative process for adults, it specifically excluded minors from the administrative penalty process. Proposed Law: This bill would prohibit a minor from being charged with an infraction or misdemeanor for evading a transit fare. SB 882 (Hertzberg) Page 3 of ? Staff Comments: By prohibiting minors from being charged with an infraction or misdemeanor offense for transit fare evasion, the provisions of this bill will have a fiscal impact on various local agencies and the courts. To the extent local transit agencies would have issued criminal citations in lieu of levying administrative penalties upon minors, the provisions of this bill could result in a significant reduction in fee, fine, and penalty revenues to the state and counties. Statewide data on the number of criminal fines assessed is unavailable, and the magnitude of the impact on the state and local jurisdictions would be dependent on various factors including but not limited to the number of minors who would have been cited for the offense, the number of counties imposing administrative penalties in lieu of criminal fines, the level of enforcement by local entities, and the collection efforts in each jurisdiction. As drafted, it is unclear whether local transit operators would retain the authority to levy a fiscal penalty on minors for fare evasion. Although the provisions of PUC § 99580(a) allow a local agency to enact an ordinance to impose and enforce an administrative penalty for fare evasion, pursuant to PUC § 99580(e), transit agencies are prohibited from establishing penalty amounts that exceed the maximum fine amount set forth in the Penal Code, which could be interpreted to be a fine amount of $0 imposed on minors for fare evasion. Such an interpretation could result in unknown, but potentially significant reductions in ongoing fiscal penalty revenues to local transit operators. -- END --