BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 887  


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  August 3, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          SB 887  
          (Pavley) - As Amended June 30, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Natural Resources              |Vote:|7 - 2        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  YesReimbursable:   
          No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill establishes a framework for reforming the oversight of  
          natural gas storage wells including continuous monitoring and  
          the installation of specified safety technology.  The bill also  
          phases out certain wells, and requires the independent  
          development and incorporation of best practices into  
          regulations.  Among other things, this bill:


          1)Requires the Air Resources Board (ARB) in consultation with  
            any local air district and the Division of Oil, Gas, and  
            Geothermal Resources (DOGGR), to develop a Facility monitoring  








                                                                     SB 887  


                                                                    Page  2





            program to identify natural gas leaks, as specified.    
            Requires a Facility operator to develop and submit a  
            monitoring plan and data to the ARB.


          2)Requires DOGGR to review and update practices for the use of  
            subsurface safety valves in natural gas storage wells to  
            reflect best practices.


          3)Requires natural gas storage wells to meet various evaluations  
            and requires DOGGR to adopt a schedule for the completion of  
            the evaluations based on risk.


          4)Requires the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment  
            (OEHHA) and the Department of Public Health, in consultation  
            with DOGGR, to perform a science-based risk assessment of  
            natural gas storage wells to determine the appropriate setback  
            distances from specified populations.  Requires DOGGR to  
            review the assessment and appropriately revise its  
            regulations.


          5)Requires DOGGR to convene an independent review panel to look  
            at risk management and automatic shutoff systems and  
            incorporate best practices into its regulations.


          6)Requires DOGGR to post all materials required to comply with  
            this bill on its website.


          7)Establishes a minimum of $10,000 per day and maximum of  
            $25,000 per day penalties for unreasonable waste of natural  
            gas.


          FISCAL EFFECT:








                                                                     SB 887  


                                                                    Page  3







          1)Increased first-year costs of approximately $4.68 million and  
            ongoing annual costs of approximately $3.75 million (Oil, Gas  
            and Geothermal Administrative Fund) for DOGGR regulatory  
            activities. 




          1)Potentially significant costs, in the million dollar range,  
            for OEHHA to conduct the risk assessment (Oil, Gas and  
            Geothermal Administrative Fund).


          2)Increased costs of approximately $360,000 (Oil, Gas and  
            Geothermal Administrative Fund) for DPH to contribute to the  
            risk assessment.




          2)Minor and absorbable costs to the Air Resources Board (ARB)  
            and the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC).


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose.  On October 23, 2015, SoCalGas detected a methane gas  
            leak at its Aliso Canyon Gas Storage Facility at Well # SS-25.  
            Following an initial evaluation and several attempts to stop  
            the leak, SoCalGas began drilling a relief well in order to  
            plug the leaking well. The initial attempts to plug the leak  
            failed, and the leak lasted 112 days before being permanently  
            capped on February 18, 2016. 


            A study in the journal Science confirmed that the methane gas  








                                                                     SB 887  


                                                                    Page  4





            leak was not only the largest in California's history, but  
            also the second largest in the nation. According to the lead  
            author of the study, as much as 60 metric tons of methane  
            spewed from the leak each hour.





            The leak displaced over 5,000 households, requiring families  
            to move into temporary housing and hotels provided by  
            SoCalGas.   Since October 25, 2016, no natural gas has been  
            injected into the facility.





            According to the author, we are now aware of the all-too-real  
            risks to public health and the environment posed by natural  
            gas facilities and must ensure meaningful changes occur in  
            their operations.  This bill will ensure a rapid response to  
            stop a leak and proactive testing and evaluation of wells to  
            prevent a leak from ever starting.


              


          2)Background.  Although natural gas storage facilities are  
            subject to the overall utilities jurisdiction of the PUC,  
            natural gas storage wells and associated piping and equipment  
            are under the jurisdiction of DOGGR.  Natural gas storage  
            wells represent a small component of the overall Underground  
            Injection Control (UIC) program (approximately 400 wells out  
            of 52,000 statewide), which generally covers permitting,  
            inspection, enforcement, mechanical integrity testing,  
            plugging and abandonment oversight, data management, and  
            public outreach.  








                                                                     SB 887  


                                                                    Page  5








            DOGGR has acknowledged widespread failures in the  
            implementation of its UIC program, and has released a "Renewal  
            Plan" to guide its commitment to reform. DOGGR has received  
            personnel and funding through recent budgets to improve  
            program implementation, data management, enforcement and other  
            functions.

            On July 8, 2016, DOGGR publicly released pre-rulemaking draft  
            regulations (Discussion Draft) for the purpose of receiving  
            public input on the development of updates to the regulations  
            governing the gas storage program. The public comment period  
            ends on August 11, 2016.



          3)Discussions Continue.  The author's office is continuing to  
            discuss how to incorporate DOGGR's existing and proposed  
            regulations and suggestions of various stakeholders into an  
            appropriate statutory framework.






          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081

















                                                                     SB 887  


                                                                    Page  6