BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 887


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          887 (Pavley)


          As Amended  August 17, 2016


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  30-9


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Natural         |7-2  |Williams, Cristina    |Jones, Harper       |
          |Resources       |     |Garcia, Gomez,        |                    |
          |                |     |Hadley, McCarty, Mark |                    |
          |                |     |Stone, Wood           |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |11-2 |Gonzalez, Bloom,      |Bigelow, Obernolte  |
          |                |     |Bonilla, Bonta,       |                    |
          |                |     |Eggman,               |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,       |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood, McCarty  |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 








                                                                     SB 887


                                                                    Page  2







          SUMMARY:  Provides a framework for reforming the oversight of  
          gas storage wells. Specifically, this bill:


          1)Requires Air Resources Board (ARB), in consultation with any  
            local air district and Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal  
            Resources (DOGGR), to develop a natural gas storage facilities  
            (Facility) monitoring program that includes continuous  
            monitoring of ambient concentrations of natural gas at a  
            Facility to identify natural gas leaks.  Requires the program  
            to include guidelines for continuous monitoring that include  
            optical gas imaging, where applicable, and accurate  
            quantitative monitoring of natural gas concentrations.
          2)Requires an operator of a Facility to develop and submit to  
            the ARB a Facility monitoring plan and the monitoring data.


          3)Defines "gas storage well" as an active or idle well used  
            primarily to inject natural gas or withdraw natural gas from  
            an underground natural gas storage facility.


          4)Requires, on or before January 1, 2018, all gas storage wells  
            to have commenced a mechanical integrity testing regime that  
            includes leak testing, casing wall thickness inspection,  
            pressure testing, and any other testing deemed necessary by  
            DOGGR.


          5)Requires DOGGR to promulgate regulations that establish  
            standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of all  
            gas storage wells to ensure that integrity concerns with a gas  
            storage well are identified and addressed before they can  
            become a threat to life, health, property, the climate, or  
            natural resources.










                                                                     SB 887


                                                                    Page  3





          6)Requires gas storage wells to be designed, constructed, and  
            maintained to ensure that a single point of failure does not  
            pose an immediate threat of loss of control of fluids.


          7)Requires operators to submit for the Oil and Gas Supervisor's  
            (Supervisor) approval various material including: 


             a)   Data demonstrating stored gas is confined to the  
               approved zone;


             b)   A site-specific risk management plan;


             c)   A natural gas leaks prevention and response program;


             d)   A protocol for public notice of a large, uncontrollable  
               leak;


             e)   A plan for corrosion monitoring and evaluation; 


             f)   Planned risk mitigation efforts; and,


             g)   A regular maintenance program.


          8)Requires DOGGR to perform unannounced random onsite  
            inspections of some gas storage wells annually.


          9)Requires an operator to develop and maintain a comprehensive  
            gas storage well training and mentoring program for employees.  
             Specifies if storage field employees are represented by a  








                                                                     SB 887


                                                                    Page  4





            labor union, the operator must consult with the relevant union  
            local.


          10)Alters annual fees charged by Supervisor to support  
            regulatory efforts at DOGGR for Facilities to include wells  
            that are not actively injecting and withdrawing gas and  
            specifies a new formula for determining how to apportion the  
            fees.


          11)Requires an additional charge to defray DOGGR's costs for its  
            response efforts to a large uncontrolled release of gas from a  
            Facility.  Requires the additional charge to be imposed  
            entirely on the operator of the Facility where the leak  
            occurred. 


          12)Requires the Public Utility Commission (CPUC) to ensure a  
            risk assessment is conducted on any new Facility evaluating  
            potential impacts of a leak from the facility on public and  
            environmental health, safety, and welfare. 


          13)Requires DOGGR's emergency regulations related to underground  
            gas storage projects to remain in effect until January 1,  
            2019.


          EXISTING LAW:   


          1)Establishes DOGGR as the state's oil and gas regulator.
          2)Requires the Supervisor to supervise the drilling, operation,  
            maintenance, and abandonment of wells and the operation,  
            maintenance, and removal or abandonment of tanks and  
            facilities attendant to oil and gas production.










                                                                     SB 887


                                                                    Page  5





          3)Defines "well" to mean any oil or gas well or well for the  
            discovery of oil or gas; any well on lands producing or  
            reasonably presumed to contain oil or gas; any well drilled  
            for the purpose of injecting fluids or gas for stimulating oil  
            or gas recovery, repressuring or pressure maintenance of oil  
            or gas reservoirs, or disposing of waste fluids from an oil or  
            gas field; any well used to inject or withdraw gas from an  
            underground storage facility; or any well drilled within or  
            adjacent to an oil or gas pool for the purpose of obtaining  
            water to be used in production stimulation or repressuring  
            operations.


          4)Requires the operator of any well, before commencing the work  
            of drilling the well, to file with the Supervisor a notice of  
            intention (NOI).  Requires approval of the NOI by the  
            Supervisor.  Authorizes the Supervisor to deny approval of  
            proposed well operations for failure to comply with an order  
            until the operator brings its existing well operations into  
            compliance with the order.


          5)Prohibits the unreasonable waste of natural gas by the act,  
            omission, sufferance, or insistence of the lessor, lessee, or  
            operator of any land containing oil or gas, or both.


          6)Authorizes CPUC to regulate gas corporations, including  
            Facilities.


          7)Requires Facilities to receive a Certificate of Public  
            Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) before constructing a  
            Facility.  Requires that the CPUC grant a CPCN on the grounds  
            that the present or future public convenience and necessity  
            requires or will require the Facility.


          8)Requires, pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions  








                                                                     SB 887


                                                                    Page  6





            Act (AB 32 (Núñez), Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006), ARB to  
            adopt a statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions limit  
            equivalent to 1990 levels by 2020 and to adopt rules and  
            regulations to achieve maximum technologically feasible and  
            cost-effective GHG emission reductions.


          9)Requires the Supervisor to continue the prohibition against  
            Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) injecting any  
            natural gas into the Aliso Canyon Facility located in the  
            County of Los Angeles until a comprehensive review of the  
            safety of the gas storage wells at the Facility is completed  
            and the Supervisor determines that well integrity has been  
            ensured by the review.  Prohibits the Supervisor from lifting  
            the prohibition on injection until the Executive Director of  
            the CPUC has concurred via letter with the Supervisor  
            regarding his or her determination of safety.


          10)Requires the CPUC, no later than July 1, 2017, to open a  
            proceeding on the feasibility of minimizing or eliminating use  
            of the Aliso Canyon Facility while still maintaining energy  
            and electric reliability for the region. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1)Increased first-year costs of approximately $4.68 million and  
            ongoing annual costs of approximately $3.75 million (Oil, Gas  
            and Geothermal Administrative Fund) for DOGGR regulatory  
            activities. 


          2)Potentially significant costs, in the million dollar range,  
            for OEHHA to conduct the risk assessment (Oil, Gas and  
            Geothermal Administrative Fund). 









                                                                     SB 887


                                                                    Page  7






          3)Increased costs of approximately $360,000 (Oil, Gas and  
            Geothermal Administrative Fund) for DPH to contribute to the  
            risk assessment. 


          4)Minor and absorbable costs to the Air Resources Board (ARB)  
            and the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC). 


          COMMENTS:  


          1)Aliso canyon leak.  On October 23, 2015, a natural gas storage  
            well, known as "SS-25," owned by SoCalGas and located in the  
            Aliso Canyon storage field in close proximity to the Porter  
            Ranch neighborhood in Los Angeles County began leaking natural  
            gas.  The leak continued until it was initially controlled on  
            February 11, 2016, and the well was successfully sealed on  
            February 18, 2016.  During the four months the well leaked,  
            there were numerous attempts to control it.  All attempts to  
            stop the leak from the top of the well failed.  A relief well  
            was finally able to stop the natural gas leak by plugging the  
            leaking well at its base.  According to a recent study, the  
            leak at Aliso Canyon was the largest natural gas leak recorded  
            in the United States, doubling the methane emission rate of  
            the entire Los Angeles basin.  Methane is a potent GHG with a  
            global warming potential more than 80 times as powerful as  
            carbon dioxide.  


            The South Coast Air Quality Management District has received  
            thousands of complaints regarding the odor.  Complaints by  
            residents suggest that mercaptans, which are odorants required  
            to be added to natural gas, were present in Porter Ranch at  
            varying levels since the gas leak started.   Some people may  
            experience adverse health effects to the strong odors of  
            mercaptans, such as nausea and headaches.  In mid-November,  
            the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, citing  








                                                                     SB 887


                                                                    Page  8





            public health concerns associated with the use of odorants in  
            the natural gas, ordered SoCal Gas to provide temporary  
            housing relocation assistance to affected residents.  Over  
            8,000 households were relocated due to the leak.  Now that the  
            leak has been stopped, residents are returning home,  
            regulators are investigating the cause of the leak, and a  
            comprehensive safety review of the other 114 wells at the  
            field is in progress. 


          2)Natural gas storage facilities.  Natural gas providers inject  
            natural gas into large underground reservoirs for storage  
            before later withdrawing the gas for sale during peak load  
            periods.  These underground reservoirs often contained oil or  
            gas that has already been extracted.  Natural gas providers  
            utilize these facilities to reduce the cost of procurement and  
            to maintain adequate supply of natural gas during peak times.   
            While the CPUC regulates natural gas providers, natural gas  
            transmission lines, and the permitting of Facilities, it is  
            DOGGR that regulates the wells that natural gas is injected  
            into and withdrawn from.  Gas storage injection wells are the  
            only type of injection wells in DOGGR's Underground Injection  
            Control (UIC) program that are not part of the primacy  
            agreement with US Environmental Protection Agency.  DOGGR's  
            UIC program regulates 14 active gas storage facilities in 12  
            separate fields across the state to ensure well construction  
            and integrity, appropriateness of the injection site, and  
            zonal isolation of the injections.  Each Facility may contain  
            dozens of active gas storage wells.  There are 343 active and  
            85 idle natural gas storage wells in the state.  Some natural  
            gas storage facilities have been in operation since the 1940s,  
            and approximately half of the active wells are over 40 years  
            old.  Natural gas storage wells vary in construction, depth,  
            design, age, location, and operating conditions.  In Aliso  
            Canyon, the wells were drilled in the 1940s for production  
            purposes and then converted into storage wells.  The wells at  
            Aliso Canyon do not contain a cement barrier along the entire  
            length of the casing and have had a history of well integrity  
            issues.  








                                                                     SB 887


                                                                    Page  9







          3)State actions.  On January 6, 2016, the Governor issued a  
            proclamation of a state of emergency, which directed several  
            state agencies to act in response to the Aliso Canyon gas  
            leak.  These actions included all of the following:


             a)   Direction to DOGGR to continue prohibiting all  
               injections into Aliso Canyon;


             b)   Direction to CPUC and California Energy Commission (CEC)  
               to reduce the pressure of the facility by withdrawing gas;


             c)   Direction to ARB to require real-time monitoring of  
               emissions;


             d)   Direction to Office of Environmental Health Hazard  
               Assessment to review public health concerns, ensure energy  
               and natural gas reliability;


             e)   Direction to DOGGR to promulgate emergency regulations  
               to require new safety and reliability measures for  
               underground natural gas storage facilities; and,


             f)   Direction to DOGGR, CPUC, ARB, and CEC to assess the  
               long-term viability of natural gas storage facilities.


            On February 5, 2016, DOGGR established emergency regulations  
            to improve the regulation of gas storage wells.  The  
            regulations include the requirement that within six months  
            (August 6) after the regulations become effective, the  
            operator of a gas storage facility to submit a Risk Management  








                                                                     SB 887


                                                                    Page  10





            Plan to DOGGR to assess the integrity and risk associated with  
            their gas storage project.  DOGGR is working with Lawrence  
            Berkeley National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National  
            Laboratory, and Sandia National Laboratory on its permanent  
            regulations for gas storage wells.  A discussion draft of the  
            regulations was released July 8, 2016.  This bill is  
            consistent with the proposals in DOGGR's discussion draft. 




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092  FN:  
          0004390